Skip to comments.
ABC Suddenly Discovers Closing Gitmo ‘Sticky’
FinkelBlog ^
| Mark Finkelstein
Posted on 01/24/2009 7:00:24 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
Isnt that convenient? Just in time to provide cover for Pres. Obama, ABC discovers that closing Gitmo isnt so easy. Downright sticky, actually.
Introducing a segment by chief investigative correspondent Brian Ross on GMA today, weekend co-anchor Bill Weir set the tone.
BILL WEIR: We turn now to the sticky prospect of shutting down the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
View video.
(Excerpt) Read more at finkelblog.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: barackobama; billweir; brianross; gitmo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; MEG33; PGalt; ...
Isn’t that convenient ping to Today show list.
2
posted on
01/24/2009 7:03:02 AM PST
by
governsleastgovernsbest
(Conservative criticism of the liberal media: www.finkelblog.com)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
seriously convenient... given the fact that a released prisoner of Gitmo became an Al Queda leader a couple of days ago
3
posted on
01/24/2009 7:03:27 AM PST
by
xtinct
("There's a sucker born every minute." P.T. Barnum)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Think about this, folks.
The President and Congress get excellent, taxpayer protection from terrorists. They have security details, shelters, aircraft, etc all situated to protect them.
The average American has nothing but what they themselves put in place.
So where is the risk to going soft on terrorists by the President and Congress?
None!
If an attack happens, the President and Congress can use the opportunity to look like great leaders and tough-as-nails.
Since the President and Congress will control the after-the-fact investigation, they will also be rendered blameless for the “hole” in our security, giving them the opportunity to “protect America” with new legislation that deprives us of more rights.
In the end, the only people who pay the price are ordinary citizens...with their lives, their money and their rights.
4
posted on
01/24/2009 7:09:03 AM PST
by
Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
dat der Gitmo closing promise, might be a tar baby!
5
posted on
01/24/2009 7:10:26 AM PST
by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Here is the Obamalamadingdong quote that is coming which will paraphrase the text, but modify the subject of Billybob Clintoon when Clintoon spoke of his efforts to push through a massive tax increase:
"I want you all to know I worked harder than I've ever worked before to close Gitmo, but we just couldn't do it"
6
posted on
01/24/2009 7:12:03 AM PST
by
Thermalseeker
(Government is not the solution to the problem. Government IS the problem - Ronald Wilson Reagan)
To: Erik Latranyi
TWA Flight 800 and Oklahoma City come to mind specifically.
7
posted on
01/24/2009 7:12:37 AM PST
by
RSmithOpt
(Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
To: xtinct
seriously convenient... given the fact that a released prisoner of Gitmo became an Al Queda leader a couple of days agoI would really like to see daily "mini-profiles" of the remaining 200 detainees at GITMO.
Or better yet, Topps or Fleer could release special sets of trading cards. Each card could contain vital stats, and where they're likely headed to after GITMO is closed.
I've suggested to my liberal alumni that they be sent to Seattle, Portland, SF, and Chicago, places where they would fit right in. They were clearly not amused by my remarks.
8
posted on
01/24/2009 7:14:52 AM PST
by
Night Hides Not
(Don't blame me...I voted for Palin!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I want to see how Obama wiggles out of this one. Gitmo is the best choice among a lot of bad choices.
9
posted on
01/24/2009 7:22:17 AM PST
by
yazoo
To: yazoo
Sticky! Like stepping in doo doo! Sempre Fi
10
posted on
01/24/2009 7:30:31 AM PST
by
cameraeye
(It only just begun. Are we losing yet?)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Friendly Terrorist coming to a neighbor near you!
released for you by Team Obama
How many more Americans will have to die?
11
posted on
01/24/2009 7:43:16 AM PST
by
Rodm
(Seest thou a ,,diligent in his business? He shall stand before kings)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Problem Solved
12
posted on
01/24/2009 7:48:22 AM PST
by
Islander7
(LOST TAGLINE - If found, please return. LARGE Reward.)
To: cameraeye
“Sticky! Like stepping in doo doo! Sempre Fi”
Gonna be interesting, isn’t it? If he offers them to other countries they won’t take them. Those who will take them will either release them or torture them. If we bring them into the US we will be obliged to try them, which will be a true sideshow Obama won’t be able to control. Every choice other than leave them at Gitmo will backfire in the worst possible way.
13
posted on
01/24/2009 7:50:50 AM PST
by
yazoo
To: governsleastgovernsbest
14
posted on
01/24/2009 7:54:22 AM PST
by
Exit148
(Have "man-on-the-street" types taken over the U.S.?)
To: Erik Latranyi
BTTT
Excellent! Well stated. Keep in mind the white wash job the 911 Commission did.
Mind if I make a few modifications and email this to my congress critters?
15
posted on
01/24/2009 7:55:47 AM PST
by
Islander7
(LOST TAGLINE - If found, please return. LARGE Reward.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Just keep talking about it. A real wake-up call for the ignorant dopes who voted for this fool.
16
posted on
01/24/2009 8:00:50 AM PST
by
truthkeeper
(It's the borders, stupid.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
U.S. Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) said that Ft. Leavenworth is an "unacceptable site" for Gitmo's detainees.
"
Some of the most dangerous terrorists in the world are at Gitmo," Roberts said. "Only one wing of the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Ft. Leavenworth meets maximum security requirements, and it's far too small for even a handful of detainees. Detainees require their own hospital and medical care, religious spaces, courtrooms, and even recreation facilities. Plus, there's no support facilities for the several thousand guards needed and their families."
Of course we can send them via taxi through the streets of Kansas City to the hospital when they are sick. I'm beginning to think that the political rhetoric and attitude of Obama to get elected is going to be exposed quickly now that he actually has taken the oath of office, twice no less. Now that he has to actually perform, I think he'll discover Bush policy has it's merits. It will be very interesting to see how The Emperor who Has No Clothes spins this.
17
posted on
01/24/2009 8:05:01 AM PST
by
HawaiianGecko
(Online internet polls are foolish: Winston Churchill, 1939)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Yet they will STILL bash Bush about Gitmo.
18
posted on
01/24/2009 8:08:00 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money. Margret Thatcher)
To: Erik Latranyi
They will do a similar thing with national healthcare. Just as with their retirement plan, only common peons will receive their healthcare through whatever mess our “betters” cobble together. The elites will have an entirely different system.
The Shrillary plan wouldn’t have even allowed commoners to go outside the system and pay out of their own pockets if they could because that would just be so unfair.
19
posted on
01/24/2009 8:13:19 AM PST
by
Let's Roll
(Stop paying ACORN to destroy America! Cut off their government funding!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Again we pay the price for the "no comment" policy of Republicans over the last 8 years. Dems were allowed to trash everything about the administration and the Congress with no more than a whimper in defense. Now, the Dems can adopt the exact same stance as Bush and make out like it is an original observation - all their own idea.
They screamed about the injustices of Gitmo and called for its closure. Did anyone ever ask them to come up with their own plan for closing it? No, all they had to do was be outraged and the sheeple followed them adoringly. No tough questions about where to send the detainees, how to try them, etc.
So, suddenly they are discovering that it may be a difficult task. Where do they send them? Hmmmmm, like no one wondered that when Bush was in charge. He was just supposed to get it done.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson