Great Great Grandpappy and Grandmammy.
Posted on 01/03/2009 7:01:24 AM PST by dascallie
Last night Ed Hale presented the (heretofore, unseen) divorce decree on Plains Radio between Obama's mother and Obama Sr ( her FIRST marriage).
The key bonus in this was the revelation of the specific version of her name in the decree, Stanley Ann D. Obama.
Using this precise name variation ( the abbreviated, initial "D" --instead of 'Dunham', was the cipher that broke open the search), they are claiming to have now located a POE (Port of Entry ) document that Obama's mother provided when she returned to the US with her son--soon after Obama's birth, (allegedly in Kenya).
The POE allegedly includes Obama's birth information/certificate ( British Kenya) as required for entry. Stay tuned for events...see other comments below. -------------------------------------------------- DesertVet Newbie
Posts: 11 Re: Obama-Dunham 1964 DIVORCE DECREE Forthcoming « Reply #53 on: January 02, 2009, 09:39:16 PM » ***********Stanley Ann D. Obama*************
No secret I've been highly skeptical on this whole ordeal. I'm now beginning to think this could very well lead the way to the smoking gun. Until this document she has only been known as "Dunham", no where in public records has Obama's Mothers name read as it does on this divorce decree. I believe the "D" being abreviated has allowed them to locate her records. This has led them to a "port of entry" birth certificate for Barack Obama. She submitted this POE certificate when she came back to the US, and the fact that there is a POE Certificate...proves that he was indeed born out of the country.
This would mean that Obama has never been through Immigration & Naturalization Services in his life, he became a citizen of Indonesia, and never applied for a U.S. passport. If this is the case, then he's not even a citizen, let alone a natural born citizen.
I'm not 100% certain on my assertion of above take on this document issue, but I think it is HIGHLY plausible. I'm still not ready to dance in the streets by any means yet (Yeah, I'm a tough sell). But I am quite intriguied at the moment. Couldn't say that earlier today.
Trial balloon to get rid of the inconvenient paternal "British subject at birth" problem? The marriage appears to have been in name only. I don't think I've ever seen a photo of the two together. No evidence that they ever resided together, in HI or elsewhere.
No way, Jose.
You have it very, very wrong.
God forbid this guy ever becomes President.
Only 2.5 weeks and that happens.
“Another good way to get people to say “oh well, nothing we can do about it” and throw in the towel.”
I contend that the Clintoons never dug into it deep enough because they couldn’t risk alienating both the black-democrat base and the white-guilt democrat base. Those 2 together make up more than half of the Dem votes.
If anything, the Clintoons are risk avoiders, not risk takers.
I'll do my part and send an e-mail to Ed and Caren Hale with the ‘Stannie’ tip.
What is the significance one way or the other of the beach photo?
Off topic: a site (right side of the web) had a link to Obama’s mum posing in the buff. I swear (pinky swear) that it's her. Of course, it serves no purpose whatsoever (sins of the father/mother) but is indicative of her nature and the company she kept.
Mostly associated with ships. But they have other records. not all records are at Ancestry.com obviously and they continously add info. There is not much info there for Obama. Searched that long ago.
Well, we KNOW they got divorced. Just don’t know where they got married.
Great Great Grandpappy and Grandmammy.
Like all too many at FR, you make your sweeping generalization and provide nothing more. So, you're saying anchor babies born in the US cannot run for president? What disqualifies them?
We have to wonder if this kind of over-the-top deception would nullify all of BO’s picks.
You - are - welcome.
* see post # 162.
beach photo taken by a friend at the time she was suppose to have been pregant..but wasn’t.
However, Obama looks like his grandfather. There are Israeli people that claim Ann wasn’t the mother and the baby was handed over to these people to raise.
Ann abandoned her baby. Obama surely has been traumatized by all the crap that has gone on in his family..and I doubt he even knows the truth.
It’s a pay site, but I have a membership because I am working on my own family tree.
I am researching as much as I can and found alot of information.
Barack’s family tree is online as well.
I think you missed the point of my post, which was in reply to expatguy. I was using the word in the sense it was used in the post to which I was replying.
Expatguy’s use of the word “technical” was meant to minimize and trivialize the Constitutional requirements for eligibility for President. I actually agree with you; these “technicalities” are crucial.
I always figured if Stanley traveled to Kenya to try and impress her african inlaws with her pregnancy, there was a passport or other record of her leaving and reentering the country. I had also concluded these records for Dunham were stolen and/or altered during last years break-in at the State dept passport files.
Whether correct or not, this is the belief held by millions (if not most) of Americans and probably the main reason why this so-called 'conspiracy' has received a collective "who cares?" among the masses. This is also why even if absolute proof of Kenyan birth is uncovered (something I highly doubt we'll see) there's not going to be millions of Americans marching on Washington over it. No civil war. No Constitutional crisis. Just a collective "so what?"
Census documents stop at 1930 because the 1940 census was burned and lost.
1950 is still considered a breach of privacy. So anything after 1930 is gone as far as census.
1957 is the latest for immigration.
There are some links to more current telephone registrations though.
“last years break-in at the State dept passport files.”
Is there a FReep post covering this? I missed it...
Before or after the aneurysms? lol Okay, not funny. Biden is a joke but just as scary as Obama. They both want new World Order and power globally.
Some Constitutionalists believe that because of Obama's fraud in the election his party would not take office. That Bush would remain until a special election. The reasoning being Biden et al, would know what was going on and be a part of the fraud. We know Pelosi and her ilk is involved since she signed off on OBama's vetting and then refused to show proof to SCOTUS.
My reasoning regardless of who takes over when Obama is imprisoned hopefully, is guarding the Constitution. If we allow this then we will allow future abandoning and destruction of everything in the Constitution. The Shadow party that paid for Obama's election is ready and willing to destroy the Consitution and our lives piece by piece.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd424.htm
Electoral college delegates. Something strange here: "I checked the Official U.S. Electoral College website today to get an idea of the votes that have come in to date. I was prompted to do this after entertaining the following questions on my blog wall from Lisa Karres...Here are a few questions for you:.Currently, Obama only has received 170 electoral votes. The deadline for submitting the votes was last week. Congress will meet on January 8th. Can Congress over-ride the Delegates if they did not give Obama his minimum required of 270? I am told this is the first time in history that many Delegates did NOT report in or submit their votes by the deadline. I have been told that Indiana ALL voted "Present" and cast zero votes. Can SCOTUS over-ride the delegates and just make Obama POTUS?"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.