I think you missed the point of my post, which was in reply to expatguy. I was using the word in the sense it was used in the post to which I was replying.
Expatguy’s use of the word “technical” was meant to minimize and trivialize the Constitutional requirements for eligibility for President. I actually agree with you; these “technicalities” are crucial.
Just posted on other thread by patriot:
Missing papers:
proof of service, notice of motion with exhibits, proposed order
1,212 posted on Saturday, January 03, 2009 11:47:43 AM by
My apology. I should have realized your post was in response to a misguided statement by another.