Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rejects Obama case
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/120808zor.pdf ^

Posted on 12/08/2008 7:12:24 AM PST by cycle of discernment

too bad


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: 911truth; bho; birthcertificate; blackhelicopters; certifigate; cfr; choomgang; colb; conspiracy; conspiracytheories; conspiracytheorists; conspiracytheory; deathofthewest; donofrio; lawsuit; obama; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; pok; ronpaul; ruling; scotus; tinfoil; tinfoilhats; ussc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,041-1,059 next last
To: Pravious
I have to admit there was still some small part of me that believed truth would conquer lies, good would conquer evil, right would conquer wrong. I know... I know, I should have forgotten all those silly ideas when more than half our country voted for Obama, but there you go.

It ain't over.

301 posted on 12/08/2008 9:00:05 AM PST by null and void (Hey 0bama? There will be a pop quiz every day for the next four years...miss a question, people die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg; EternalVigilance

Leo just updated his blog. According to him his case is denied and not pending (at least that’s what I made of it), but Cort’s has not been acted upon. I agree that the Keyes case has the best chance.

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

EternalVigilance can you give us any updates on the Keyes case?


302 posted on 12/08/2008 9:01:02 AM PST by atlbelle44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: LS

So, the Constitutional requirements are meaningless as long as enough stupid, brain-washed Americans say so.

Sad you think that way.


303 posted on 12/08/2008 9:01:13 AM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: luvadavi

And that was based on a lie too.


304 posted on 12/08/2008 9:01:25 AM PST by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

This will be Barack Hussein Obama’s “Monica Lewinski” if he doesn’t make the sealed records public. It isn’t something that just goes away. Press, investigators, anyone wanting to make a name for himself/herself will continue to dig until something is revealed.


305 posted on 12/08/2008 9:02:10 AM PST by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: atlbelle44
DONOFRIO APPLICATION DENIED - WROTNOWSKI APPLICATION STILL PENDING

My application was denied. The Honorable Court chose not to state why.

Wrotnowksi v. Connecticut Secretary of State is still pending as an emergency application resubmitted to the Honorable Associate Justice Antonin Scalia as of last Tuesday. I worked extensively on that application and it includes a more solid brief and a less treacherous lower Court procedural history.

After six days, it’s interesting that Scalia neither denied it nor referred it to the full Court.

My case may have suffered from the NJ Appellate Division Judge having incorrectly characterized my original suit as a “motion for leave to appeal” rather than the “direct appeal” that it actually was. On Dec 21 I filed official Judicial misconduct charges with the NJ Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct, and I updated SCOTUS about that by a letter which is part of SCOTUS Docket as of Dec. 22. The NJ Appellate Divison official case file is fraudulent.

On the chance that SCOTUS was looking at both my case and Cort’s case, I must stress that Cort’s case does not have the same procedural hang up that mine does. It may be that without a decision on the Judicial misconduct allegation correcting the NJ Appellate Division case file, SCOTUS might have been in the position of not being able to hear my case as it would appear that my case was not before them on the proper procedural grounds.

I did file a direct appeal under the proper NJ Court rules, but the lower Court judge refused to acknowledge that and if his fraudulent docketing was used by SCOTUS they would have a solid procedural basis to throw mine out.

I don’t know if it’s significant that Cort’s case was not denied at the same time as mine. His case argues the same exact theory - that Obama is not a natural born citizen because he was a British citizen at birth.

All eyes should now be closely watching US Supreme Court Docket No. 08A469, Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz.

If Cort’s application is also denied then the fat lady can sing. Until then, the same exact issue is before SCOTUS as was in my case. Cort’s application before SCOTUS incorporates all of the arguments and law in mine, but we improved on the arguments in Cort’s quite a bit as we had more time to prepare it.

I was in a rush to get mine to SCOTUS before election day, which I did do on Nov. 3.

Cort’s case has a much cleaner lower court procedural history.

I’m not trying to play with people’s minds here. SCOTUS has not updated Cort’s docket and until they do there can be no closure. I was expecting, if they didn’t grant certiorarir, that they would deny both cases at the same time so as to provide closure to the underlying issue.

CLICK HERE

306 posted on 12/08/2008 9:02:23 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: dman4384
He fought all the way to the Supreme Court to avoid showing his birth certificate.

No, he alone could not have done this.

307 posted on 12/08/2008 9:02:23 AM PST by TribalPrincess2U (Dirty Dems at their best is always the worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nonsporting
It would have been interesting if Ruth "Buzzy" Ginsberg could transport herself back in time to my eighth grade civics teacher, Miss Lamps, who, upon telling me back 40 some years ago that I could never be POTUS because I am not a natural born citizen, would lay out for her that in 2008, SCOTUS would reject even the consideration of a case challenging the potentially-not natural-born status a citizen president-elect who refuses to show his original birth certificate while such status seems readily suspect.

My teacher would've railed against Ruthie and I would've been proud of Miss Lamps.

Had my teacher been a liberal or readily accepted Buzzy-the-time-traveller's representation, acquiescing to her representation as "fine with me" or some such, I almost certainly would never have grown be the staunch Conservative I am.

I therefore must weep for today's school children in ever so many ways, and in turn, for our country's path.

HF

308 posted on 12/08/2008 9:02:36 AM PST by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

My point is that the electorate wants this guy to be president.....
::::::::::
To be accurate, ONLY HALF of the electorate wants this charlatan be president. Only half. Not really much different than 2000 or 2004 in that regard.

Pray for America. We need all the help we can get.


309 posted on 12/08/2008 9:02:43 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

I would hope that some here realize that this will allow many instances of the same in the public arena.

To wit, _all_ students applying for admission to a public accomodation (example: University of Michigan) can now simply enter that they are of African-American descent. The accomodator will necessarily have to take that by the student’s word, no matter what the student looks like. Since they accept federal money, they could not request proof because, to do so, woould be racist.


310 posted on 12/08/2008 9:02:51 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
His eligibility was decided years ago. Period.

When and by whom???? Hollywood??? the MSM??? Is he any more eligible than John McCain??? And yet the Senate was called upon to draw up a resolution [SR511] to settle McCain's eligibility and declare him a "natural born citizen".

Where is Obama's Senatorial resolution? Was he afraid to request one? Let's see the Senate declare Obama eligible using the same standards they used for McCain. They can't. Because according to the standards in SR 511, Obama is not eligible for POTUS.

Egg will look appropriate on a lot of Senatorial faces in January.

311 posted on 12/08/2008 9:02:57 AM PST by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: atlbelle44

The CA Secretary of State, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and virtually all of the Obama electors have been served. A hearing is expected soon.


312 posted on 12/08/2008 9:03:05 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Hey Horowitz! Just because we don't swing left doesn't mean we're "unhinged".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: LS; LucyT; Fred Nerks; Beckwith; george76; F15Eagle; Polarik; SatinDoll
The majority elected him, and a very large part of those who did not vote for him would find it distasteful and childish to go back and try to “undo” an election. And that’s precisely how it would be viewed, as “undoing” a “legal” election. The public absolutely won’t stand for it.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I believe that you disregard what the public will stand for. It always stands for truth, and Obama has spent a million bucks to obfuscate his social record and his birth place.He defended the actions asking for his birth details with the same law firm that CAIR uses.

Article II of the Constitution is there for a purpose. Its purpose is to assure the undivided loyalty of a President to the People, and the Constitution.For the first time in our nations history, we have a president who does not genuinely have that loyalty to the people or the constitution.Nor has he served in the defence of our bnation in the military, which would have mitigated that fact. And we will see where that leads perhaps, but I believe that it will result in untold tragedy for all Americans, and immense suffering regardless of what one's politics might be for people at home, and for people abroad who are not Americans, but who fall withn the sphere of influence of the United States.

There are consequences to snubbing the guidance of our Founding Fathers, but the self-centered baby boomer generation has never considered such consequences of any real import, its all just selfish fluff and fantasy feel good Utopian dream.Wake up is about to happen,BIG TIME.

We now will be asked to abandon our individual freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, or modify them out of existence. Jonah Golberg has written extensively about it and predicted it.

Much worse is to come.

The country will now divide itself in to those who wish to reamin free, and those who want to become enslaved.

The outcome of that dynnamic will decide whetner we live in peace or at war with our neighbors and our family/relatives.

313 posted on 12/08/2008 9:03:31 AM PST by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
However, I'm adjusting my strategic mindset to the reality of the disadvantages we now find ourselves in.

That's fine. An army is more than men with guns. It takes everything from radiomen and cooks snipers and psy ops types and as long as you aren't playing Tokyo Rose against our troops you're good with me.
314 posted on 12/08/2008 9:03:34 AM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

For the umpteetnh time, this case was NOT about the Birth Certificate!!


315 posted on 12/08/2008 9:03:49 AM PST by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

SCOTUS REJECTS BIRTH CERTIFICATE CASE, RIOTS CANCELED (for now).


316 posted on 12/08/2008 9:03:51 AM PST by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silentknight; Owl_Eagle
There is something to this story, maybe it is just something very embarrassing on the Birth Certificate.

I do not see why he is spending so much $$ on legal fees to keep it hidden. There is a reason...

317 posted on 12/08/2008 9:04:46 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (You cannot help the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: LS

The Supreme Court has said it will not review the Donofrio case, but it did not offer further comment. So I guess that’s that (at least for that case).

However, the following is still apparently the facts of the matter:

The photo at http://tinyurl.com/6pv6kv is not a photo of Obama’s birth certificate. It is a photo of a “Certification of Live Birth.” If Hawaii had verified that this photo of a “Certification of Live Birth” was authentic, I would accept that. But it has not, as far as I can tell.

What Hawaii has said it possesses is a Hawaiian birth certificate, on the other hand, for Obama, which would look like this: http://tinyurl.com/4rnudo. This photo is from 1963, and it seems likely that what Hawaii has verified it possesses is a document very similar to this. Hawaii, it should be noted, has not — as far as I can find in news reports — said anything to authenticate the “Certification of Live Birth.”


318 posted on 12/08/2008 9:05:03 AM PST by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xzins; P-Marlowe; jude24; enat
Xzins said: The truth is that the constitution does require that any president be 35 years old, a natural born citizen, and 14 years a resident.

The truth also is that the constitution does not establish any responsible office or party to verify that those qualifications are met....


- - - -
The Constitution does establish the "responsible party" - i.e., CONGRESS. See Amendment 20 and/or see the discussion of this process in the Robinson v. McCain order. (This was the case filed by Keyes' party in California earlier this year.)

So, we'll have to wait and see whether there is at least one Senator and one Representative in Congress willing to raise the required written objection on January 6 (?), when they meet to count the Electoral College vote. If they do (and it takes just ONE of each), then Congress will address the issue.
319 posted on 12/08/2008 9:05:42 AM PST by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: TonyStark
The social contract, what tattered remains of it were left between the judiciary and the citizenry under the Constitution, is now officially null and void.

HEY! I am not!

I mean I am.

Uh wait...

*nevermind*

320 posted on 12/08/2008 9:06:47 AM PST by null and void (Hey 0bama? There will be a pop quiz every day for the next four years...miss a question, people die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,041-1,059 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson