Skip to comments.
No Quarter Should Not Be Banned
self ^
| 9/18/2008
| Solfour
Posted on 09/18/2008 9:42:58 AM PDT by solfour
I tried to post here an excellent editorial on Obama's economic corruption but was disallowed because the source is noquarterusa.net.
I became interested in No Quarter recently because it pops up when searching for information about Obama's birth. It is a Democrat site, but right now, it is pro-McCain and anti-Obama and it seems a shame not to be able to use its work.
Also, I don't really see the point of banning articles by source (since you can ban users or subject articles to review depending on the source), but if you must, it would be nice if the check for a banned source could be done automatically BEFORE one spends the time and effort to post the article.
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: banning; newbie; noquarter; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
09/18/2008 9:42:58 AM PDT
by
solfour
To: solfour
I would have to agree with you on this one.
To: solfour
3
posted on
09/18/2008 9:46:50 AM PDT
by
texson66
("Tyranny is yielding to the lust of the governing." - Lord Moulton)
To: solfour
4
posted on
09/18/2008 9:47:16 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: solfour
5
posted on
09/18/2008 9:47:56 AM PDT
by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: solfour
This will probably be zotted but I agree that regardless of the nature of the site, provided it isn’t complete fabrication/hoax/rumor or a site that has requested “no links”, it should all be fair game for discussion.
But it’s Jim’s site and I do defer to his judgements.
6
posted on
09/18/2008 9:48:16 AM PDT
by
weegee
(Say no to the Marxist who "denounces" the 911 terrorist attacks and yet befriended a Pentagon bomber)
To: solfour
Why not take it to the admins/JimRob privately?
7
posted on
09/18/2008 9:48:27 AM PDT
by
NoGrayZone
(NObama is the evil face of racism.)
To: solfour
To: solfour
Part of the problem is you are very new here and we have been getting a lot of trolls and DOS hits lately.
9
posted on
09/18/2008 9:51:48 AM PDT
by
stockpirate
(United Socialist States of America - Welcome to the New Marxist revolution! Nationalizing Companies)
To: solfour
I smell solfour...
Heh, only kidding. People are all too willing to jump on a juicy zot...don’t see many these days...:)
You make valid points...
10
posted on
09/18/2008 9:52:09 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Who is Saul Alinsky and why is Barack Obama is a disciple of his methods?)
To: solfour
11
posted on
09/18/2008 9:52:35 AM PDT
by
joe fonebone
(The Second Amendment is the Constitutions reset button)
To: solfour
I'd rather not see this site polluted with Larry Johnson's blog. If he has anything credible to say, it will be available through legitimate sources.
12
posted on
09/18/2008 9:52:48 AM PDT
by
KJC1
To: solfour
...it would be nice if the check for a banned source could be done automatically BEFORE one spends the time and effort to post the article.You lost two minutes off your life? Oh, the horror.
To: solfour
When you run your own website, you can have what content you want.
When you are a GUEST here at FR, you abide by the owners wishes, or pack it in and find another venue.
IBTZ
14
posted on
09/18/2008 9:54:48 AM PDT
by
Pistolshot
(Palin has run a state, city, and a business. NObama has only run his mouth.)
To: joe fonebone
looks like i made itHe's barry, barry impressed. :O)
To: solfour
JimRob has more patience than most human beings
I can not recall a single instance in which a link was banned, prior to earning that status.
Nor has a member been banned without being granted the opportunity to justify their motives.
To: library user
i’m.....i’m.....speechless.... ;)
17
posted on
09/18/2008 10:03:50 AM PDT
by
joe fonebone
(The Second Amendment is the Constitutions reset button)
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: rlmorel
I smell solfour.......what does that smell like?.....burnt troll;^)
19
posted on
09/18/2008 10:08:11 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(I'm gonna use "Sarah!" FROM NOW ON SINCE Hillary uses "Hillary!".)
To: solfour
Out of curiosity, did you privately FReepmail JimRob with your concerns about this issue before you decided to stir up the pot with this subversive vanity?
20
posted on
09/18/2008 10:08:29 AM PDT
by
Between the Lines
(I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson