Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama opposes gay marriage ban
SacBee ^ | 6/30/08 | Aurelio Rojas

Posted on 06/30/2008 7:33:57 PM PDT by pissant

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, who previously said the issue of gay marriage should be left up to each state, has announced his opposition to a California ballot measure that would ban same-sex marriages.

In a letter to Alice B. Toklas LGBT Democratic Club read Sunday at the group's annual Pride Breakfast in San Francisco, the Illinois senator said he supports extending "fully equal rights and benefits to same-sex couples under both state and federal law."

"And that is why I oppose the divisive and discriminatory efforts to amend the California Constitution, and similar efforts to amend the U.S. Constitution or those of other states," Obama wrote.

Obama had previously said he personally opposes same-sex marriage, but each state should make its own decision.

A spokesman for Republican presidential candidate John McCain, who last week endorsed Proposition 8 on the Nov. 4 California ballot, accused Obama of continuing a pattern of changing his position on issues.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: bo; ca2008; democrat; democrats; gaypride; gayvote; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; obama; protectmarriage; samesexmarriage; sanfrancisco; sf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
No surprise. He probably considered marrying Larry Sinclair at one time....
1 posted on 06/30/2008 7:33:59 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant

I think Obama needs to campaign on his support for gay marriage. Unfortunately, if he did that I’m sure McStain would jump on board with his support too.


2 posted on 06/30/2008 7:39:08 PM PDT by chaos_5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Apparently, the issue of gay marriage should be left up to each state, so long as each state is prepared to approve of the issue of gay marriage.


3 posted on 06/30/2008 7:39:50 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Et si omnes ego non)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chaos_5

McPain came out (suprisingly) in favor of the CA constitutional amendment. Too bad he hasn’t discovered the conservative position on illegal aliens or global warming.


4 posted on 06/30/2008 7:40:41 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

You noticed that too, huh? What a charlatan.


5 posted on 06/30/2008 7:41:15 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chaos_5
Actually McCain was invited on The Ellen Show, and she asked him about gay marriage.

He stood strong and told her he disagreed with her on the issue.

6 posted on 06/30/2008 7:47:24 PM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free, freerepublic.com baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant
That's today.

Nobody knows about tomorrow (but I'm pretty sure we can guess reliably on this one).

7 posted on 06/30/2008 7:50:00 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

No doubt that if the polls show most are in favor of the ban bambi will change his tune once again. He is a complete fraud.


8 posted on 06/30/2008 7:50:50 PM PDT by HerrBlucher (Barack's mesmerizing speeches are little more than oratory Three Card Monte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware; pissant
I'm sure if you put McCain in front of the right group of people he would say something different. Remember he said he “learned his lesson” on the amnesty issue, and just today (on Rush) he was in front of a group of “Latinos” promising amnesty “yesterday, today and tomorrow”.

He may be better than Obama in many, many, ways. I just don't trust him not to say anything to anyone, especially if it goes against Conservative principles.

9 posted on 06/30/2008 7:51:52 PM PDT by chaos_5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Who knew there was a ‘Pride Breakfast?’

Will there also be breakfasts for Greed, Lust, Envy, Wrath, Sloth and Gluttony?


10 posted on 06/30/2008 7:51:56 PM PDT by DancesWithBolsheviks (We're all mavericks now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Obama is out of step with the American people on same sex marriage. In every state where the issue has been brought to a vote, the public has overwhelmingly voted to affirm traditional marriage.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

11 posted on 06/30/2008 7:55:12 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DancesWithBolsheviks

The other six Deadly Sins are subsumed under Pride. The Democratic Platform.


12 posted on 06/30/2008 7:58:06 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Once again, he redefines words. SO typical of leftists. The proposed Amendment reaffirms marriage , even the meaning of marriage. It doesn't ban anything. Same sex marriage is an oxymoron, a “ban” is not what is needed for that, what IS needed is a suspension of reality. Which is pretty much what the left would like to force everyone to do.
13 posted on 06/30/2008 7:59:49 PM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

“Apparently, the issue of gay marriage should be left up to each state, so long as each state is prepared to approve of the issue of gay marriage.”

Unfortunately, when it is left up to the states and the people vote against same sex unions, as with Prop 22, the courts by fiat can overturn the will of the people of the state. I wonder if Obama supports judicial tyranny over the rights of the state’s voting majority?


14 posted on 06/30/2008 8:00:09 PM PDT by 444Flyer (Marriage=1 man+1 woman! Vote "YES" on Prop 8, amend the Calif. State Constitution this November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chaos_5

No need to tell me about Mccain. I’m writing in Duncan Hunter in November.


15 posted on 06/30/2008 8:04:17 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Exactly right. Those who favor states rights on the marriage issue want to see same-sex marriage. They aren’t truly in favor of each state making a determination of whether they want homosexual marriage.

It’s good to see them be honest about their positions. Why doesn’t Obama just come out and say he favors homosexual marriage? He said he’s against it, but wants each state to decide, so he says. Yet he’s also in favor of repealing the federal marriage law. So on the one hand, he says let states decide (ya right) and on the other hand, he prefers there to be no law at the federal level defining marriage.

And with no law at the federal level, that leaves it wide open for future federal courts to say, well, there’s no law against same-sex marriage at the federal level, so just accept any definition of marriage from any state instead. That’s where this is headed.


16 posted on 06/30/2008 8:05:37 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DancesWithBolsheviks

[Who knew there was a ‘Pride Breakfast?’]

Hey, just let him eat his waffle. This is a distraction.


17 posted on 06/30/2008 8:06:11 PM PDT by littlehouse36 (Odingo dingo bo bingo Fe Fi fo fingo Banana nana bo bingo -- Odingo. Osama sama bo Bama fe fi fo fa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer

Yes Obama does favor judicial tyranny. Because he is against the move to override the Calif. court decision via constitutional amendment, he is against any moves to overturn the court order.


18 posted on 06/30/2008 8:07:46 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

And he obviously loves judicial activism, because he applauded the CA court’s usurpation of power that stripped away the will of the people.


19 posted on 06/30/2008 8:10:11 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I oppose Obama running for president!


20 posted on 06/30/2008 8:13:30 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson