Posted on 06/30/2008 4:18:23 PM PDT by SJackson
There are four things in America for which there is little forgiveness. The first is killing your wife, as O.J. Simpson discovered. The second is allegations of child molestation, as Michael Jackson found. The third is being old, as John McCain is rapidly discovering. And the fourth is having too many children, as I have found.
Looking down at primitives with "too many" children is one of the last acceptable prejudices in the West. With our ninth child expected imminently, God willing, I find myself pitied and pilloried wherever I go. "Wow, that's a lot of kids," is a refrain I constantly hear. What a shame I didn't have instead, say, eight antique cars, or better, eight homes around the world, for which I would have been thought a success. But eight kids? That proves your either a religious kook or someone ruining the environment by overpopulating the earth.
Enter The New York Times Magazine this past Sunday with a cover story called "Childless Europe" which claims that the Germans, Italians, the French and the Bulgarians are disappearing off the face of the earth due to a shockingly low birthrate, or what demographers call "lowest-low fertility." This truly ominous article relates that for the first time on record, birthrates in parts of Europe have dropped below 1.3 per family.
"For the demographers, this number has a special mathematical portent. At that rate, a country's population would be cut in half in 45 years, creating a falling-off-a-cliff effect from which it would be nearly impossible to recover." In Germany "where the births-to-deaths ratio now results in an annual population loss of roughly 100,000, the government's family minister declared that if her country didn't reverse its plummeting birthrate, "we will have to turn out the light."' Italy is dealing with the crisis by paying parents to have children, and Russia has national make-love days where they encourage couples to go home and conjure up a child.
Pope Benedict summed it up best. "Europe is infected by a strange lack of desire for the future. Children, our future, are perceived as a threat to the present."
WHILE THE article blames the falling birthrate on poor government policies that do not enforce maternity leave or subsidize post-natal care, as well as inflexible working conditions for women, a far more important reason is growing Western narcissism. As the West becomes richer, it is also becoming more self-absorbed.
Children consume time and resources both of which young adults would rather focus on themselves. Better to have the freedom, and the cash, to jet to Paris for the weekend than push a kid on some dumb swing. Not that we don't love kids any more. We do, but in an abstract, as-long-as-it-doesn't-interfere-with-our-freedom kind of way. Having them in our thirties, and about one or two max, minimizes the disruption.
Never before in history has a civilization skewed more away from the needs of the community and toward the aggrandizement of the individual. In the US, a warrior class consisting of about two percent of the population fights bad guys in Baghdad and gets blown up in Kabul while the rest of us go on Facebook to update our "friends" as to our emotional state. The regular flow of Facebook status updates telling us that "Jane feels like shopping today" or "Mort misses his ex-girlfriend Linda" feeds the Truman Show mentality of American youth who are taught to believe that the whole world revolves around them. Sacrifice be damned.
The most powerful TV show in modern American history is American Idol. The title is telling. It promises that you too can grow to be a puffed-up celebrity. Meanwhile, when I approached several television executive friends and pitched a family healing show for the brave military families that have to be re-integrated after a hero returns from Iraq, I was told that the military doesn't rate on TV. We simply don't want to be reminded of the selfish lives we are leading by watching the selfless lead theirs.
When you ask twenty-something Westerners to contemplate parenthood - with its diapers, school runs, and estimated $250,000 cost of raising a child to adulthood - they think you fell off the moon. Spend my life focused on someone else, even if it is my own child - have you gone mad?
When you later tell them that the very future of their nation depends on it, they gaze with the same incredulity. The idea of doing almost anything for their country, baby-making included, is utterly foreign to them. Meanwhile, tens of thousands of Jewish singles continue to attend a truly staggering variety of singles events in Manhattan in a never-ending quest to find the best. Do they deserve any less?
BUT LOOK at what is lost when young people delay having children until their mid-thirties and then have one kid. At risk is not only the morbid disintegration of once great nations like Japan and South Korea, both of whom average 1.1 child per family, or half the replacement rate, but something far more fundamental. When children have no siblings, they don't learn to share as much and they don't assume responsibility for taking care of one another. And the condition of being an only child runs the risk of fostering the very narcissism we decry, as the child becomes the epicenter of his parent's life with no other children to distract them.
And is it good for boys to grow up without sisters, given that one of our society's greatest problems is growing male disrespect for women? The boy who feels a filial connection with a girl who is his sister remembers the feeling of how he wants her to be treated when he dates someone else's sister.
I know the complaint that too many kids in a family means that each will get less parental attention. The simple response to this absurd argument is that attention is a poor substitute for real love. Celebrities get attention, while family members get love. A child who is immersed in an environment where he is surrounded by the love of both parents and siblings is a child who never feels alone.
Everywhere you look these days, people are becoming grandparents at about 70. But how many years does that leave a child to grow close to his grandparents, learn from their wisdom, and connect with an older generation? By the time the child is 10, his grandparents are already octogenarians who are often growing more physically dependent and infirm.
The Western cult of narcissism is spoiling our kids, making us neglectful of our elders, spawning an out-of-control material insatiability, and destroying us - quite literally - by having us die off without a replacement generation.
And of all the many remedies available that might free us from our growing self-absorption, having one more baby than we originally planned for our marriages is the best remedy of all.
Islam
Abortion, Divorce, Euthanasia (that would be death with dignity)... They got the whole damned thing called life pretty much surrounded... all with excellent rational reasons of course... which can all fall under the heading of “Mental Cruelty”
Well not my Church. What was it that Chesterton said?
Well this is a brutal paraphrase but: “On the one side you have a marble statue and on the other an ice statue in all ways identical, practically indistinguishable... except with the sacramentalism gone - in time - rather mercilessly dependent on the weather.
Now those Churches that caved in, are talking about “schisms”... but they’re only squabbles.
I don't think the issue is which church, but whether the participants have a traditional, rather than a liberal, view of life.
As stated by other posters, it is the traditional Catholics, Evangelicals, Orthodox Jews, Mormans that are producing large families in the Western world.
The problem is *not* that people don’t want children, it is that a combination of expensive nanny government and culture make children far too expensive and difficult to have.
The recipe for children is easy. First things is that the parents must have the energy and time to have children. This means that the father isn’t worked to death, and ideally, the mother is a homemaker, and is not employed outside of the home.
In turn, this also means that taxes must be low enough for married couples to do this. Married couples should have lower taxes, married couples with children should have very low or even no taxes. It is a fair exchange for the wife refraining from work.
At the government level, this does imply several things. First, they much encourage a type of work for husbands that encourages them to have children. Second, young married families need housing areas that are “child-centric”, excluding people who are not likely to reproduce, criminals, prostitutes, and other “interferers”.
Birth control must be removed, and abortion prohibited except when pregnancy is life threatening. OB/GYN and fertility services should be readily available.
In major nations, this is important enough to build new cities specifically for breeding, or gentrify a large area of an existing city just for that purpose. Patriotism, marriage and family *will* be taught in school as part of the regular curriculum.
Parents should be strongly supported by churches that emphasize having children, which are doctrines in most churches, yet are rarely emphasized. Most religions would be amiable to doing this.
Finally, parents should have near total authority over their own children, with little or no government interference.
They have two, a boy and a girl.
One of these days, I will loose my composure and ram my size 11 shoe down some ones throat.
Four kids, 2 grandchildren so far.
Something like that, yeah. We’d probably never get to the point Starship Troopers was, since there would be some strong opposition to some of the other social structures that made the Citizen/resident dichotomy possible. I haven’t seen ID4 in a while, so I forget the specific reference there (though I can guess).
Actually, the whole thing stems from my applying for a Desert Storm plate here in TX, and thinking about how vets shouldn’t have to pay the full registration price for a legitimate vet plate as a small way that the state could be making good on the whole “we owe our soldiers a debt etc etc...” thing. It just kinda snowballed.
Yeah, but you're probably French-Canadien, and don't know any better ................ FRegards
(Let's see if she takes the bait - ex-Canuck)
“Better to have the freedom, and the cash, to jet to Paris for the weekend than push a kid on some dumb swing.”
I pushed a 2 year old in a swing only yesterday and immensely enjoyed his babyish “WEEEEE!” when I pushed. His 9 month old brother enjoyed just sitting in my lap in the swing in the yard until he got tired and fell asleep.
I notice the Turks seem to have a good balance down. I’ve only had one bad experience with any Turk, and that’s because he was a bigtime lib and not really related to his culture of origin.
I think living in that climate, and between two warring cultures, has raised a sort of cautious indifference to the extrema on either side and an emphasis on harmony and productiveness. Kinda like the Swiss, or the Belgians.
There's a brilliant idea. I nominate you to go to Riyadh and try to promote freedom of religion. See how far it gets you.
Disappearing babies? Personally, Rabbi Shmuley, I blame Michael Moore.
My maternal great grandparents had 11 children and nine of them lived to adulthood. I am here on this earth thanks to a big family.
Very true indeed.
“Some people, upon learning this say things like “Well you will be happier” or “It is better for the environment anyway”.”
I have noticed lately that lots of people, upon hearing someone’s disappointment, feel the need to insert their own judgment or perspective into someone else’s situation.
Not that I’ve had anything as tough as having trouble conceiving, but in a comparable situation all I need to hear from someone is “that sucks” or “I’m sorry” or “let me know if I can do anything.” They may think their suggestions are helping - they’re not, they are inserting their own viewpoints into a problem that isn’t theirs.
Well met.
Let me how this plays out - I'll be over here in this hardened bunker, wearing my flak vest and helmet...
btt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.