Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

*LIVE THREAD* DC vs Heller decision due at 10:00 EST (2nd Amendment)
SCOTUS Blog ^ | 6-26-08 | shameless vanity

Posted on 06/26/2008 3:55:39 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat

Today is the day.

The folks at SCOTUS blog will be providing a live blog to follow developments as quickly as possible.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: banglist; bitter; elections; heller; judiciary; scalia; scotus; secondamendment; shallnotbeinfringed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 1,081-1,098 next last
To: mondonico

5-4 vote — dodged a bullet on that one


261 posted on 06/26/2008 7:15:08 AM PDT by mondonico (Peace through Superior Firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

Fox news stating that Heller was affirmed!!!!!


262 posted on 06/26/2008 7:15:12 AM PDT by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rosenfan

Willy!!!

Site sure is slow! So many of us hitting reload!


263 posted on 06/26/2008 7:15:16 AM PDT by petro45acp (NO good endeavor survives an excess of "adult supervision" (read bureaucracy)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

The Court has released the opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller (07-290), on whether the District’s firearms regulations – which bar the possession of handguns and require shotguns and rifles to be kept disassembled or under trigger lock – violate the Second Amendment. The ruling below, which struck down the provisions in question, is affirmed.

Justice Scalia wrote the opinion. Justice Breyer dissented, joined by Justices Stevens, Souter and Ginsburg. We will provide a link to the decision as soon as it is available.

10:13 Tom Goldstein - Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm


264 posted on 06/26/2008 7:15:20 AM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free, freerepublic.com baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Affirmed 5-4. Now let’s see the details.


265 posted on 06/26/2008 7:15:24 AM PDT by KeyesPlease
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Tears of joy...


266 posted on 06/26/2008 7:15:27 AM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9 (DR #1692)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
The devil’s in the details. Hope they’ve got an Evelyn Wood grad on standby to go through the fine print.

The shorter it is, the better. I'm afraid that if it's a tome, it's going to be an exercise in having the Second Amendment nuanced out of existence. IMHO.

267 posted on 06/26/2008 7:15:33 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Sweet victory!!!!!!!!!!!


268 posted on 06/26/2008 7:15:33 AM PDT by StoneWall Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Never so happy to be wrong.

Protects INDIVIDUAL Right to bear arms. Yes! Looks like 6-3 decision?


269 posted on 06/26/2008 7:15:38 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan (Americans are not quitters Congressman Hastings, we find a way to win! - allenwestforcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

No surprises


270 posted on 06/26/2008 7:16:03 AM PDT by EDINVA (Proud American for 23,062 days.... and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

YES!


271 posted on 06/26/2008 7:16:31 AM PDT by Vision ("If God so clothes the grass of the field...will He not much more clothe you...?" -Matthew 6:30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Never so happy to be wrong.

Protects INDIVIDUAL Right to bear arms. Yes! Disregard 6-3; Souter and Stevens blended together. *LOL*

Will be pretty clear cut if only one majority opinion.


272 posted on 06/26/2008 7:16:34 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan (Americans are not quitters Congressman Hastings, we find a way to win! - allenwestforcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

One majority opinion, too. That’s very important. Good day today.


273 posted on 06/26/2008 7:16:44 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: mondonico

Anyone want to venture a guess on how this might have turned out with Sandra Day O’Connell still on the bench?


274 posted on 06/26/2008 7:16:44 AM PDT by So Cal Rocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: bvw

Only two opinions - a majority opinion and a dissent. No other separate opinions to cloud the issue.


275 posted on 06/26/2008 7:16:55 AM PDT by xjcsa (Has anyone seen my cornballer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: mondonico

Winner! 5-4. DC law overturned


276 posted on 06/26/2008 7:17:04 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

We came one vote away from losing our rights. That’s scary.


277 posted on 06/26/2008 7:17:15 AM PDT by paul544 (3D-Joy OH Boy!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
Justice Scalia wrote the opinion. Justice Breyer dissented, joined by Justices Stevens, Souter and Ginsburg.

This is why I'm voting for McCain. Imagine the type of person Barry would nominate to join the Leftist Four on the Court!

278 posted on 06/26/2008 7:17:18 AM PDT by TonyInOhio (The dice are on the table. It is hot in Suez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Justice Scalia wrote the opinion. Justice Breyer dissented, joined by Justices Stevens, Souter and Ginsburg.


279 posted on 06/26/2008 7:17:44 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: IMissPresidentReagan

This was a 5-4 decision.

THIS IS WHY WE MUST ELECT JOHN MCCAIN, WARTS AND ALL, THIS NOVEMBER.

Can we really bear having a radical Chicago machine politician appoint the next Supreme Court justice?


280 posted on 06/26/2008 7:17:49 AM PDT by mondonico (Peace through Superior Firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 1,081-1,098 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson