Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SUE, SARAH, SUE
New York Post ^ | May 27, 2008 | No Byeline

Posted on 05/27/2008 7:28:12 AM PDT by cake_crumb

May 27, 2008 -- The polar bears are doing just fine, thank you very much.

So says Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, who announced last week that her state would sue to block Washington from listing the animals as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act.

And it's a good thing, too - because the new bear-population protections mask what may be the most serious threat to American economic might in decades.

Yes, polar bears.

The polar bear, you see, marks the first species on the "threatened" list whose supposed predicament is linked directly to global warming.

The current Alaskan polar-bear population may be near an all-time high.

But Interior Department computer models - such as they are - project widespread melting of the polar ice the bears need to hunt.

And that's a big problem, given the near-limitless powers embedded in the Endangered Species Act.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: drillanwr; globalwarming; globalwarmingscam; junkscience; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: Diana in Wisconsin

‘Possums’ll get listed as soon as one is found hissing and snarling in the middle of an oil field...


21 posted on 05/27/2008 7:49:25 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Obama = Bumbling Tyrant who loves America's enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy
Don’t Polar Bears eat baby Harp Seals?

Yeh -- among other things.

Why?

22 posted on 05/27/2008 7:49:30 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20 (Appeasement is feeding the dragon hoping he will eat you LAST. Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
No. Congress - after a FEDERAL JUDGE, a Clinton appointee, forced the Department of the interior to "stop dragging it's feet" on listing the polar bear...as though "the debate was closed". Which it wasn't, and it isn't. I know the president is a convenient whipping boy around here, but if you're going to blame somebody, at LEAST blame the guilty.

Nonsense. The judge only told them to make a decision. They decided to go with the bureaucrats' politically-motivated opinions, instead of vetoing them.

23 posted on 05/27/2008 7:50:26 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Armadillos must be on someone’s list. I see more and more of them smashed on the highway around here...

BAN AUTOMOBILES -- BETTER YET, BAN PEOPLE -- THEY DRIVE THE AUTOMOBILES.

24 posted on 05/27/2008 7:53:30 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20 (Appeasement is feeding the dragon hoping he will eat you LAST. Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

Declaring polar bears as endangered is another step toward permanently preventing drilling in ANWR.


25 posted on 05/27/2008 7:53:36 AM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

DITTO TO YOUR DITTOS.


26 posted on 05/27/2008 7:54:23 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20 (Appeasement is feeding the dragon hoping he will eat you LAST. Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: livius
I think she’d be a fantastic VP for McCain - she’d solve a lot of his problems on many fronts.

Can't disagree with that.

27 posted on 05/27/2008 7:56:44 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20 (Appeasement is feeding the dragon hoping he will eat you LAST. Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
You are absolutely right. In addition, C02 is at its lowest level in this planet's history. Cutting it further only starves the poor little trees that environmentalists like to hug. Did you ever wonder how many trees give their lives to make up pamphlets to convince to the ignorant masses that global warming exists?

Also, the number one recognized greenhouse gas is water vapor. None of those computer models take water vapor into account and thus even their empirical evidence of global warming doesn't even exist. Until water vapor is taken into account, it ain't science, it's just politics.

28 posted on 05/27/2008 7:57:15 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Obama = Bumbling Tyrant who loves America's enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

Isn’t the Department Of Interior part of the executive branch?


29 posted on 05/27/2008 7:57:36 AM PDT by preacher (A government which robs from Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Right on!!!!

See tgline below.

30 posted on 05/27/2008 8:01:16 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20 (If the opposite of Pro is Con, what is the opposite of Progress? -- Tom Glennon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: montag813

The way she wrote her findings sure seemed like she already had her mind made up...and of course congress will go along with the environmental lobby. Follow the money.


31 posted on 05/27/2008 8:03:29 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Obama = Bumbling Tyrant who loves America's enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Click the link to see what the enviro-wackos are crying about:

Sea Ice September 1979 - September 2007

I suspect this year will be a different story:

Sea Ice May 26, 1979 - May 26, 2008

32 posted on 05/27/2008 8:05:34 AM PDT by CedarDave (Obama: We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

33 posts and no Palin photo?


33 posted on 05/27/2008 8:06:22 AM PDT by VirginiaConstitutionalist (The top 1% of income earners earn 17% of the income, but pay 39% of the income taxes. "Fair share?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

If people end up paying five or six dollars a gallon for heating oil and get the idea that polar bears are causing it, the bears really might become endangered all of a sudden....


34 posted on 05/27/2008 8:07:24 AM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Why did the chicken cross the road?

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.To show the armadillo it could be done.

35 posted on 05/27/2008 8:11:35 AM PDT by Osage Orange (Hillary's heart is blacker than the devil's riding boots...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mbynack
"Declaring polar bears as endangered is another step toward permanently preventing drilling in ANWR"

Not just ANWR. Offshore, too. We're hurting because of the price of gas NOW - just imagine how much more we're going to be hurting if non-endangered polar bears prevent arctic drilling.

36 posted on 05/27/2008 8:12:24 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Obama = Bumbling Tyrant who loves America's enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
Sorry. I didn't even know what she looked like. Besides, it's the guys' job to post the pics of the women...she really is quite attractive though.

37 posted on 05/27/2008 8:17:58 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Obama = Bumbling Tyrant who loves America's enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
"If people end up paying five or six dollars a gallon for heating oil and get the idea that polar bears are causing it, the bears really might become endangered all of a sudden...."

Yeah: we're all going to need polar bear skin coats just to stay WARM.

38 posted on 05/27/2008 8:19:18 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Obama = Bumbling Tyrant who loves America's enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
The congruence of two factors does NOT infer that the presence of one caused the other.

My daughter came home from her PC indoctrination center (school) a few weeks ago convinced that cars were causing global warming. I asked what evidence they had to show that cars cause global warming and she dutifully recited the canard about how CO2 levels and warming had both gone up during the last 30 years and that had to mean that one was causing the other.

I explained to her that Dihydrogen Monoxide is a far more dangerous substance than CO2. Studies have shown a perfect correlation between exposure to Dihydrogen Monoxide and death. In fact, every man, woman, child, animal or plant that is ever exposed to Dihydrogen Monoxide eventually dies.

Dihydrogen Monoxide is of course water. Correlation does not equal causation.

My daughter is 12, so her naiveté is understandable. What is Algore's excuse?

39 posted on 05/27/2008 8:19:22 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy ("I believe in Santa Claus. I believe in the tooth fairy." - John Edwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20
"If the opposite of Pro is Con, what is the opposite of Progress?-- Tom Glennon"

Congress. BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Great tagline ;-)

40 posted on 05/27/2008 8:21:06 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Obama = Bumbling Tyrant who loves America's enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson