Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Immigration Theater
Wall Street Journal ^ | 24 May 2008 | Editorial Staff

Posted on 05/24/2008 3:40:59 PM PDT by shrinkermd

Federal immigration officials raided an Iowa meatpacking plant this month... Nearly 400 of the plant's 900 employees were arrested on immigration charges. Do you feel safer?

Ever since immigration reform died in Congress last year, the Bush Administration has made a show of stepping up enforcement. But do homeland security officials really have nothing better to do than raid businesses that hire willing workers – especially in states like Iowa, where the jobless rate is 3.5%? These immigrants are obviously responding to a labor shortage for certain jobs. Giving them a legal way to enter the country would free up homeland security money and manpower to focus on real threats.

Meanwhile, back in Washington, lawmakers continue to ignore this economic reality and pretend that illegal immigration is nothing more than a law enforcement issue. The good news is that their latest attempt to turn employers into immigration police appears to have stalled.

The Secure America Through Verification and Enforcement Act (SAVE) was introduced by Heath Shuler, a North Carolina Democrat. The bill does nothing to increase legal immigration, which is the only realistic way to decrease illegal immigration. Instead, it throws more money at a mandatory employment verification system (E-Verify) for the nation's six million employers.

The Democrats never intended to pass the measure, mind you. While collecting co-sponsors, Mr. Shuler assured Democrats there would be no action this year.

Rahm Emanuel, the Blue Dog patron in the House leadership, told reporters that a recent Congressional Budget Office report had given him pause. The CBO estimated SAVE would cost more that $30 billion in lost tax revenues and spending because it would increase the number of employers and workers who resort to the black market outside of the tax system.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; congress; freestuff; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; mugwhores; save
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: shrinkermd; gubamyster; HiJinx
Federal immigration officials raided an Iowa meatpacking plant this month... Nearly 400 of the plant's 900 employees were arrested on immigration charges. Do you feel safer? Ever since immigration reform died in Congress last year, the Bush Administration has made a show of stepping up enforcement. But do homeland security officials really have nothing better to do than raid businesses that hire willing workers – especially in states like Iowa, where the jobless rate is 3.5%? These immigrants are obviously responding to a labor shortage for certain jobs. Giving them a legal way to enter the country would free up homeland security money and manpower to focus on real threats.

Reading that you would never know the owners of the plant were scumbags hiring what amounts to indentured servants.

Biggest immig raid ever much worse than you think

21 posted on 05/24/2008 5:17:15 PM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

WSJ—The usual retarded open borders bull from the capitalists without loyalty to America


22 posted on 05/24/2008 5:23:44 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

BIG SIGH

I still have my Duncan bumper sticker on my car..

Sob..


23 posted on 05/24/2008 5:26:07 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Do you feel safer?
____________________________________________

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Not yet...

Ask me again when 40,000,000 have been deported...


24 posted on 05/24/2008 5:28:47 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Rep. Cole is still feeling the love 8 days later. LOL!

http://blog.nrcc.org/comment.cfm?entry_id=400

“Dear Mr. Cole,

If you were serious about helping American families you would reverse the insane government policies that:

—Comsume up 40% of the average middle class family’s income with taxes.

—Transfer much of that tax revenue to special interests — witness the disgusting pork-laden farm bill that so many republican Congressmen approved.

—Increase the cost of food through price supports, the ethanol mandates, etc.

—Increase the cost of energy by prohibiting energy exploration just about anywhere oil and gas deposits are found in the United states.

—Fail to police the borders of the United States.

—Allow unlimited numbers of illegal immigrants to drive down the value of American labor, while allowing illegal immigrants access to public benefits.

—Prevent parents from removing kids from disastrous, unsafe, 100%- education-free school districts, like the Los Angeles Unified School District.

By the way Mr Cole, I notice that nobody from the NRCC has deigned to reply to the thousands of posters on this blog. This alone speaks volumes
about what’s really important to Tom Cole and the NRCC.

Posted: Mike W. - California on May 24, 2008 at 2:50 PM”


25 posted on 05/24/2008 5:33:02 PM PDT by dynachrome ("Socialism is the feudalism of the future.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
Rep. Cole is still feeling the love 8 days later. LOL!

After Juan's baldfaced and unabashed betrayal of their interests, last year: this was so absolutely, positively NOT the issue on which to cross the conservative voting base.

Whole lotta congresscritters are gonna be blinking rapidly, come the evening of 11/04, and whimpering: "... but... but... how in God's name did all of this just happen? I'M A CLOSE, PERSONAL FRIEND OF KARL ROVE, FOR PITY'S SAKE -- !!!" ;)

26 posted on 05/24/2008 5:40:26 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

We too, cancelled our subscription to WSJ. They called twice to find out why. They got their ears burned but good.

They just don’t get it. Illegal equals violation of the law. We don’t get to pick and choose among the laws to which we will or will not conform.


27 posted on 05/24/2008 5:45:03 PM PDT by SatinDoll (Desperately desiring a conservative government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
I can't speak for other people with an opinion on immigration I will state right up front that I not only want an end to illegal immigration, but a large cut-back in legal immigration. Back to where they must assimilate instead of going into self-perpetuating ghettos. Back to where American citizens are not being harmed by lost jobs.

Back to where immigration is for benefiting America, and not the world.

28 posted on 05/24/2008 5:57:16 PM PDT by chesley (Where's the omelet? -- Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley
I will state right up front that I not only want an end to illegal immigration, but a large cut-back in legal immigration. Back to where they must assimilate instead of going into self-perpetuating ghettos. Back to where American citizens are not being harmed by lost jobs. Back to where immigration is for benefiting America, and not the world.

A-a-a-a-men.

29 posted on 05/24/2008 6:10:47 PM PDT by Liz (Without the brave, there'd be no land of the free. Senator Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

"You're arresting me just 'cause I flacked Juan McCain on FRepublic?"

30 posted on 05/24/2008 6:13:44 PM PDT by Liz (Without the brave, there'd be no land of the free. Senator Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
We don’t get to pick and choose among the laws to which we will or will not conform.

No man is above the law and no man is below it: nor do we ask any man's permission when we ask him to obey it.
- Theodore Roosevelt

31 posted on 05/24/2008 6:18:30 PM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Last year May 2 Wall Street Journal editorializes on the need for the immigrant workers, and to relax the opposition to the illegal aliens here.

Further on that issue Joe Morgenstern reviews the movie ‘Waitress’, and in the review conclusion tells us that writer director actress
Adrienne Shelley is brutally murdered by a construction worker at her office. He avoids letting us know the killer is an illegal alien.

32 posted on 05/24/2008 7:00:31 PM PDT by dr huer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
These immigrants are obviously responding to a labor shortage for certain jobs.

BS. I read that the workers were getting $5 an hour. The labor shortage is for workers at that rate. Pay more and plenty of Iowans would be willing to take the jobs.

33 posted on 05/24/2008 7:21:24 PM PDT by radiohead (I stood up for Fred at the Iowa Caucus. Where were the rest of you so-called conservatives?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Thanks for the link. Disgusting; the feds need to throw the book at Agriprocessors’ management.


34 posted on 05/24/2008 7:24:45 PM PDT by radiohead (I stood up for Fred at the Iowa Caucus. Where were the rest of you so-called conservatives?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Bump for later


35 posted on 05/24/2008 8:38:23 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
This is a classic Michelle Malkin Hot Air Vent from June 2007.

http://hotair.com/archives/2007/06/07/new-vent-gorilla-warfare-against-the-open-borders-wsj/

Michelle had commented on the WSJ’s no borders policy, they responded about a "Guerrilla" attack.

Michelle then hoists them with a "Gorilla" attack using the WSJ’s own video showing their hypocrisy with an entire editorial board meeting of middle aged white males, with one woman, sitting on the window sill, no place at the table for her, and one black man, no place at the table for him either. But hey, we're the bigots!

36 posted on 05/24/2008 8:57:46 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

The WSJ is horrible they are the Simon Legree’s of the buggy whip industry with a touch of Goebels. Defending a 19th century sweatshop as the model of American prosperity, what scum, what morons.


37 posted on 05/24/2008 10:15:52 PM PDT by junta (It's Poltical Correctness stupid! Hold liberals accountable for their actions, a new idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

So do I.

It’s never coming off!


38 posted on 05/25/2008 6:42:05 AM PDT by Califreak (Hangin' with Hunter-under the bus "Dread and Circuses")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Liz; chesley
I will state right up front that I not only want an end to illegal immigration, but a large cut-back in legal immigration. Back to where they must assimilate instead of going into self-perpetuating ghettos. Back to where American citizens are not being harmed by lost jobs. Back to where immigration is for benefiting America, and not the world.

Easily 60-70% of the legal immigrants we get from Mexico and Central America are as low class and uneducated as the illegal aliens we get

The real disaster is we allow in more legal immigrants from Mexico than anywhere else. Something like 400,000 per year mostly due to "family reunification". 

If I were king of America I would build a border fence, reduce legal/illegal Mexican immigration to zero and allow 400,000 Europeans (real Europeans not Muslims living in Europe) to immigrate here each year with preferences for educated English speakers and those learning English. This was pretty much our immigration policy before the Ted Kennedy immigration acts of 1965 which changed our emphasis on immigration from Europe to immigration from the 3rd world

39 posted on 05/25/2008 7:06:03 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Pre-Hart Celler laws discriminated against southern and eastern Europeans too. Nevertheless, those are some good points. We can’t all be king, however. ;-)


40 posted on 05/25/2008 7:09:05 PM PDT by Clemenza (Why do I Find Myself Attracted to Amy Winehouse?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson