Skip to comments.
Reuters cameraman films his own death [video]
Jerusalem Post ^
| Apr. 17, 2008
Posted on 04/17/2008 5:17:25 AM PDT by Alouette
Reuters footage released on Wednesday shows the final moments of agency cameraman Fadel Shana as he films an IDF tank firing, moments before apparently being hit by the shell.
Subsequent footage shows the Reuters jeep on fire, and Shana's body lying next to it. Shana's jeep was marked "press" and witnesses said the cameraman was wearing an identifying flak jacket.
Reuters Editor-in-Chief David Schlesinger has called for an investigation of Wednesday's incident.
(Excerpt) Read more at jpost.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: banglist; gaza; hamas; idf; journalist; reuters; warcorrespondent
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-120 next last
To: chadwimc
Exactly. See my pic post just above.
21
posted on
04/17/2008 5:44:49 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(<===Bitter, Gun-totin', Typical White American)
To: Alouette
Shana's jeep was marked "press" Does "press" mean "Fire" in Hebrew?..................
22
posted on
04/17/2008 5:45:34 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: ClearCase_guy
Perhaps he wanted to get a bunch of "hits" on his MySpace page.................
23
posted on
04/17/2008 5:47:45 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: Ezekiel
>>>>Shana's jeep was marked "press" and witnesses said the cameraman was wearing an identifying flak jacket.
>>Why does this look like a Far Side caption?
Heh!

"Bummer of a birthmark, Hal"
24
posted on
04/17/2008 5:48:12 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(<===Bitter, Gun-totin', Typical White American)
To: RGSpincich
Nice find on your image, or series of images.
25
posted on
04/17/2008 5:49:18 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(<===Bitter, Gun-totin', Typical White American)
To: FreedomPoster
a cameraman and a jihadi with a shoulder-launched anti-tank missile/rocket, look the same from the perspective of someone on the receiving end Uh, yes. I give the tanker high marks for accuracy.
To: RGSpincich
Thanks for that set of pictures. That camera does resemble a sighting device of a rocket launcher. Real DUH moment. Not smart to point that at a tank in a combat area.
27
posted on
04/17/2008 5:54:14 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(Typical white person, bitter, religious, gun-owner, who will "Just say No to BO.")
To: FreedomPoster; Squantos; archy
Many modern weapons from sniper rifles to rocket launchers have optical sights.
You correctly point out that from the POV of a soldier, a lens pointing at you from a few hundred ways may be the immediate precursor to your death, via a sniper bullet or rocket.
A soldier has only a split second to react, in order to save his life.
If you embed with terrorists, and point a camera lens at soldiers from near them, you are going to get shot, period.
28
posted on
04/17/2008 5:56:14 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
To: four more in O 4
bollywood videos.
What an odd thing to say.
*hint- Pallywood.
To: RGSpincich
30
posted on
04/17/2008 5:56:52 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
To: NativeNewYorker
No doubt. The Israelis know how to train tank crews, as has been obvious to anyone paying attention since at least 1967.
31
posted on
04/17/2008 5:59:04 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(<===Bitter, Gun-totin', Typical White American)
To: Alouette
Maybe the Jeep was marked “REUTERS”.
32
posted on
04/17/2008 5:59:07 AM PDT
by
Sender
(Stop Islamisation. Defend our freedom.)
To: Alouette
Shana's jeep was marked “press” and witnesses said the cameraman was wearing an identifying flak jacket.
I saw only a small sign about 2x2 ft square that said TV in bold red against a white background and it looked like it was hastily placed on the hood. Also, I saw more than one “victim” at one part and none of them were wearing a flak jacket.
33
posted on
04/17/2008 6:05:09 AM PDT
by
crazyhorse691
(The faithful will keep their heads down, their powder dry and hammer at the enemies flanks.)
To: Alouette
Something isn’t right there. How is it that there is that one “dead” guy in a perfectly clean white shirt with the one blood stain in what appears to be a posed position.
That just looks staged from every angle.
34
posted on
04/17/2008 6:13:27 AM PDT
by
CougarGA7
(Wisdom comes with age, but sometimes age comes alone.)
To: NativeNewYorker
35
posted on
04/17/2008 6:15:27 AM PDT
by
mcshot
(Loving God, Family, and Guns more then ever because of Lib threats to our survival.)
To: Red Badger
“Shana’s jeep was marked “press”
Does “press” mean “Fire” in Hebrew?.................. “
Hebrew for fire is “esh” not a bad audio garble!
Good catch!
36
posted on
04/17/2008 6:32:27 AM PDT
by
petro45acp
(NO good endeavor survives an excess of "adult supervision" (read bureaucracy)!)
To: Alouette
Was Al-Reuters embedded with the enemy?
37
posted on
04/17/2008 6:34:25 AM PDT
by
weegee
(Religion is the opiate of the masses MARX1843 They get bitter, they cling to...religion OBAMA2008)
To: petro45acp
Ambulances were used by terrorists to make escapes. Terrorists dressed like police and blew themselves up on buses.
Sometimes a wolf stalks in sheep’s clothing.
Perhaps if the media exposed the tactics of the terrorist movement and distanced themselves from the killers, they would not be caught in the crossfire or on the receiving end along with their buddies.
38
posted on
04/17/2008 6:36:36 AM PDT
by
weegee
(Religion is the opiate of the masses MARX1843 They get bitter, they cling to...religion OBAMA2008)
To: SamuraiScot
"Shana's jeep was marked "press" So was Rachel Corrie....
39
posted on
04/17/2008 6:37:48 AM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: FreedomPoster
PBS aired a documentary about the “insurgency” including footage shot by reporters of the “insurgents” launching missiles at our side and randomly at cities.
Onlookers didn't pay much attention one way or the other to the military strikes the terrorists (who fly no flag) were launching.
But media talks about how wrong it is for us to launch return fire on “innocent civilians”. The civilians let the initial strikes happen. And didn't bother to leave the warzone. The enemy flies no flag in Iraq and technically are civilians. Who is an “innocent civilian” except the Iraqi citizens receiving those initial missile launches for supporting the new government?
40
posted on
04/17/2008 6:40:23 AM PDT
by
weegee
(Religion is the opiate of the masses MARX1843 They get bitter, they cling to...religion OBAMA2008)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-120 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson