Posted on 02/01/2008 1:41:58 AM PST by Jim Noble
NEW BEDFORD - A convicted sex offender arrested this week on charges of raping a 6-year-old boy in the public library had been released from prison a year ago, despite the strenuous objections of the district attorney and three psychologists who argued that he posed a serious threat to children.
Superior Court Judge Richard Moses denied the prosecutor's motion to keep Corey Saunders in custody indefinitely, arguing that he had a low IQ and had suffered physical and sexual abuse as a child.
The judge said Saunders, who was sentenced to four years for the attempted rape of a 7-year-old boy in 1999, had not committed any major sexual offense while he was in prison. Moses released Saunders, ruling that he was not dangerous.
Later, Saunders was classified as a Level 3 sex offender, the most dangerous category considered likely to reoffend. Level 3 offenders are required to register with local police, and their photos are posted on a state website....
Near the end of his ruling, Moses wrote, "Saunders will be required to register as a sex offender, and the public will be provided with the protections afforded by such statute."
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
These two facts about this criminal - that he is stupid and that he has had a hard life - have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the issue in front of the "judge", which is, does he meet the criteria of the law for detention.
How many judges like this are there on the bench? What sort of executives appoint them? And how can they be removed?
By the way, this is an excerpt - the main body says he was appointed by Jane Swift (R) before Mitt was in office, in case you were wondering.
He should never walk free.
Saunders will be required to register as a sex offender, and the public will be provided with the protections afforded by such statute.”
Seems pretty obvious to me that statute did nothing to protect this child.
In a perfect world judge would be held accountable for this travesty
A lawyer in a dress allowed this boy to be raped. he should at least find another job where his failures do not endanger children.
Regards
How does one impeach a democrat party monster like Richard Moses?
This judge has clearly shown to be just to stupid to be a judge. In fact, with that sort of mental problem I’m not sure just what job he would be qualified to hold.
” . . . had not committed any major sexual offense while he was in prison.”
What???
"Moses, who was appointed in December 2002, during the waning days of Jane Swift's acting governorship . . .
This means that he was undoubtedly a hack appointment.
BEWARE OF RINOS!
bkmarking for tonight. Thanks for the post.
Honorable Barbara J. Rouse
Chief Justice of the Superior Court
Superior Court Administrative Office
Suffolk County Courthouse, 13th Floor
Three Pemberton Square
Boston, MA 02108
617-788-8130
And here is how you CALL OR WRITE THE JUDGE, or copy him on what you wrote to his boss:
Honorable Richard T. Moses
Superior Court
U.S. Post Office & Courthouse
15th Floor
90 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109
617-788-8130
I'm pinging all of you who responded to earlier threads on this Forum about child rape in libraries as a result of the ACLU's ludicrous suit to permit the viewing of porn on library computers. Please take a moment to call or write your protest of this judge's lax enforcement to his superior, and also to the Governor of Massachusetts, Deval Patrick:
Massachusetts State House
Office of the Governor
Room 360
Boston, MA 02133
Phone: 617.725.4005, in state: 888.870.7770
Email form click here
Please be respectful, and please ping your FRiends.
Offender Accused of Boy's Library Rape
Authorities slam release of accused [library rapist] despite rough childhood [New Bedford, Mass]
Police arrest homeless sex offender in library [Des Moines]
Sex Offender Busted In Racine (WI) Library
Man Accused Of Watching Child Porn At Library [Marshfield, Mass]
This bleeding-heart judge needs to be held accountable. If I were this boy’s father, he would be.
What's so striking about this case are the "reasons" the judge gave for unleashing this monster.
I'm quite sure there is nothing in Massachusetts law which allows early release for being stupid, or for having a bad childhood.
If anything, those would be reasons to be detained longer.
So in addition to being foolish and dangerous, the judge is lawless.
Something is going to have to be done eventually about lawless judges.
I don’t know if this topic fits into any of ya’lls ping lists - it appears we don’t have a category for “Really Bad Judges”.
One of the reason’s he had no sex offences in prison is because there aren’t any kids in there.
Judge needs to be second in line to be hung.
This is why child rapists should fry.
I know he's a persona non grata around FR, for good reason, but the only person I can see who is doing something about judges now is Bill O'Reilly. He exposes stupid decisions like this, has his crew follow and question judges who make bonehead decisions, and bawls them out on the air. It's very refreshing. For all his superficial "research" on some topics, you have to hand it to Bill for his rabid attacks on child molesters and their enablers, like this judge.
..Needs to be disbarred, removed from the bench, and sued by the parents.
As much as I hate the "Sue" mentality of this nation, it is only with this type of action that judges will start protecting CITIZENS, instead of CRIMINALS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.