Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daily Pundit Recommends: Write In Fred Thompson for President
Daily Pundit ^ | January 26, 2008 | Bill Quick

Posted on 01/27/2008 1:24:59 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

That’s the sum of it. If you can’t bring yourself to vote for the offerings in your primary, or if the eventual nominee is somebody you can’t stomach, don’t sit out, and don’t vote for the Democrat. Write in Fred Thompson’s name.

Why?

By doing so, you send a message that can’t be mistaken or spun. It is a message that says:

“I am a Republican who wanted to vote for a conservative GOP candidate, but wasn’t able to do so. I can’t vote for a Democrat, but I can’t vote for any of the Republicans, either. So I’m writing in the name of the candidate I wish I could have voted for, because he is the kind of candidate I could support.”

They have to learn that if they want conservative votes, they have to nominate candidates conservatives would want to vote for.

This strategy is the only one that offers any hope of changing the leftward move of the GOP in the future. Sitting out won’t do it - they can spin the reasons why you sat out. Voting Democrat won’t do it, they can spin it that the GOP candidates weren’t liberal enough. Even voting “None of the Above” won’t do it, because that doesn’t specify what you want instead of none of the above.

I’m pretty sure that if this notion starts to get traction, Fred Thompson will publicly oppose it. Don’t worry, and don’t listen to him. This isn’t really about Fred Thompson. It’s about the future of the Republican party. Fred ran because he hoped to influence that, but he failed. Now it’s time for the rest of us to take a crack at it.

So remember: Just write in Fred Thompson’s name when it comes time to cast your vote. (There’s nothing stopping you from writing it in for other offices, either).

And ignore all the squalling that you have to vote GOP because it is marginally less evil than the Democrats. Given the rate of decay we’re seeing now, even that won’t be true (if it really is even now) in a couple more election cycles.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatism; conservatives; election; electionpresident; elections; fredthompson; gop; republicans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-195 next last
To: Aria
I didn’t take it personally...I just thought that we can’t depend on a refusal to participate having a good outcome - as it eventually did during the Clinton admin.

I agree we can't depend on that -- but I believe we can depend on a bad outcome if we keep giving the GOP a blank check. :(

I will be participating -- I will write in a candidate for president and fight like heck for conservative congressional candidates. We're going to need them.

101 posted on 01/27/2008 3:07:10 PM PST by ellery (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice - B. Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: docbnj

Yeah, that will kick Clinton x2’s Ass.


102 posted on 01/27/2008 3:07:11 PM PST by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Route66

Romney is the only candidate left who even panders to the right.


103 posted on 01/27/2008 3:07:19 PM PST by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m sorry, but I can’t agree. I love Fred, but I feel it would be a waste of my vote to vote for him when he has withdrawn. And I don’t think he’d want us to waste our votes.


104 posted on 01/27/2008 3:07:24 PM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

But what if 200 million folks wrote in FRED ???????


105 posted on 01/27/2008 3:09:16 PM PST by MrPiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: MrPiper

The exchange was about Arnold supporters.


106 posted on 01/27/2008 3:10:24 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Huckabee basically says he’s a liberal at every debate. The way I see it, it always takes guts to say you are pro-capitalism.


107 posted on 01/27/2008 3:10:38 PM PST by ari-freedom (the idea of Bill Clinton back in the White House with nothing to do is something I can’t imagine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: MrPiper

But what if there were 200 million pink unicorns with purple polka dots and funny hats that voted for Fred?????


108 posted on 01/27/2008 3:12:29 PM PST by ari-freedom (the idea of Bill Clinton back in the White House with nothing to do is something I can’t imagine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I am not writing in someone who doesn't WANT to be in it. And I say this as a former Thompson supporter.
109 posted on 01/27/2008 3:12:37 PM PST by reagan_fanatic (Just another reluctant Mitt Supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrPiper
If you cant see the difference between Hillary/Obama and the Republicans running, then you do not have enough clarity to make rational decisions in the voting polls.

If you are going to vote for people not even running for office, then you dont you dare come on here and complain about whatever President is in office nest year. I supported Fred, I even sent money, I wanted him as President. He is no longer a Candidate, he withdrew. Fred is not a candidate. FRED IS NOT A CANDIDATE.

Three things you need to learn:

1. Hillary/Obama are FAR FAR FAR worse than any Republican running.

2. Fred is not running.

3. Your vote affects the entire country, not just your own personal pride.

110 posted on 01/27/2008 3:13:21 PM PST by GregoTX (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
pink unicorns with purple polka dots Can't vote, Folks can:-)
111 posted on 01/27/2008 3:13:54 PM PST by MrPiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: GregoTX
Fred is not running

And the Republicans have no conservatives running. Whats your point?

112 posted on 01/27/2008 3:16:03 PM PST by MrPiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Aria

Maybe they sent a message that the GOP needed to change. Which it did enough to win in 1994. (Do you keep going to a restaurant that serves terrible food, because they’ll get the message and improve?)


113 posted on 01/27/2008 3:16:17 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

As I said, Huckabee is the least of the evils that I can see. To me, he is preferable to Romney, McCain, and Giuliani. Next after him is Paul, though I doubt I could vote for him or anyone below him on my list.


114 posted on 01/27/2008 3:16:28 PM PST by Ingtar (Romney is not the answer. What was the question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: MrPiper

depends if the democrats have control or not...


115 posted on 01/27/2008 3:16:52 PM PST by ari-freedom (the idea of Bill Clinton back in the White House with nothing to do is something I can’t imagine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

I have conservative congress critters, done all I can there.


116 posted on 01/27/2008 3:20:32 PM PST by MrPiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

The Huckster is weak on immigration and he is a notorious TAX AND SPEND man who think gov’t is the answer to everything. He is in the wrong party, actually.

He is a snake oil salesman who uses his folksy southern expressions ...a little too much. He knows nothing about foreign policy and he seems to pimp McCrazy. That alone tells me alot.

No thanks on the Huckster.


117 posted on 01/27/2008 3:23:00 PM PST by JaneNC (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: MrPiper

I’m moving on, enjoyed the thread. I can’t vote for Romney, McCain, and Giuliani. End of story.


118 posted on 01/27/2008 3:23:07 PM PST by MrPiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: MrPiper
"Whats your point?"

I made my point over and over, here it is again since you asked.

Make your vote count. Write in votes do not send a message. Protest votes do not send a message. They are a shallow emotional response that put the Democrats into office. My point is to find a candidate that is actually running for office and vote for the one that closest matches your values.

Do not play a part in putting my family under a Hillary Clinton rule because of an emotional vote rather than a strategic one.

119 posted on 01/27/2008 3:24:25 PM PST by GregoTX (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: GregoTX

If it were Paul vs. Clinton, whom would you vote for?


120 posted on 01/27/2008 3:25:26 PM PST by ellery (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice - B. Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson