On very interesting note, is that YouTube has not only disabled comments for this video, and the video of a New Hampshire focus group commenting on her performance. YouTube has acutally taken down all the comments.
This usually never happens unless there is a legal issue.
This is war at the front lines of Liberals.
Compared to what Bill has seen, this is probably pretty mild.
After her performance last nite, some blog respondents already have coined a new name for her ... “Chillary”.
I watched the debate and saw that ‘moment’ and think much is being made of it undeservedly. She came across and very focused, mad but not shrewish.
I think Hill is in a box. One little thing and it is magnified to an extreme.
I don’t like or want her but I think this is being overplayed and may end up not hurting her. It was if everyone was poised, just waiting for her to show anything of a feeling side and ready to pounce.
In short, I had a moment of sympathy for her. ANd if I, a diehard Hillary hater, had a moment of sympathy, she may garner some sympathy.
Stick a fork in her...
I thought she would be a shoo-in after NY, FL, and CA.
BUTTTTTTTTTTTT.......
Turns out the dims have done away with “winner take all”, so even if she could come up with a way to get to the convention with the most delegates, she’ll never have a lock.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
I think Edwards knew this was a “moment”.
Watch her eyes, she’s scary.
Typical liberal lies about their “accomplishments”. Hillary is claiming success for 35 years of accomplishments that never happened. Just because she was for or against an issue does not mean that it was passed. Hillary’s ONLY legislative accomplishment in her 35 years is maybe the naming of a post office or two in upstate NY. Anything else she spouts off are lies.
Probably didn’t want a server crash...
I got that photo, BTW, from a Reuters piece in the Times Colonist, Canadian Press.
Rivals criticize Obama in New Hampshire race
Mark Egan, Reuters
Published: Sunday, January 06, 2008
http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=8de462c2-6565-4835-85ad-9beef57406b7
hilary SUX.
wow, if hillary were elected,
it’d be kkkulture wars everyday,
of an intensity never seen in american politics.
The video “Undecided Voters in New Hampshire” is still on youtube, and has gotten 42,000 viewers in 8 hours.
It is devastating news for the Clintons, if at all representative. We have learned to be suspicious of the selection process for these televised events, but if one may trust this room full of voters, Clinton has a nasty case of cooties.
Yeah, lots of fights going on within the change gang. The most depressing political discourse I’ve ever seen. To snap out of it they need to mention making change to the NYC deli operaters - see how far that will get them. Didn’t they watch the South Park episode to see how ridiculous they all look and sound?
On second thought, if they get more specific in their discourse, it’s just socialism with an occasional strand of inconvenient impurity. Ugly stuff. I don’t see how a person with any common sense at all can tolerate the verbal “change” assaults. Common sense -does it exit in the Democrat party?
What hit me was how she brought back images of Kruschev pounding his shoe at the UN. "We will bury you!" and all that.
I will say, though. She did present herself far better than she has on previous occasions. I didn't really pick up on the screech factor that much in this appearance, and that's to her advantage.
The most exciting thing is that Obama has raised the level of the debate just by presenting a realistic threat to Hillary's nomination.
Note to Hillary: Try placing that deckchair by the rail - that's better!