Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spending our way to financial ruin (each American household owes $455,000 for entitlements)
San Francisco Examiner ^ | 12/22/07

Posted on 12/22/2007 7:22:36 AM PST by Libloather

Spending our way to financial ruin
Dec 22, 2007 6:00 AM (4 hrs ago)
The San Francisco Examiner Newspaper

SAN FRANCISCO - It is no coincidence that U.S. Comptroller General David Walker’s latest warning that the United States is literally spending its way into bankruptcy came the same week Congress passed a 3,416-page omnibus spending bill that no senator or representative will read. Walker’s warning is made all the more urgent because Congress — aided and abetted in many respects by the president — continues to pass massive spending bills with no idea of what’s contained in them.

The federal government is already on the hook for $53 trillion in Social Security, Medicare and other entitlement benefits that it can’t pay for unless it raises taxes to levels that will put America into a financial Stone Age.

In releasing the federal government’s 2007 financial report at the National Press Club earlier this week, Walker noted that each American household owes $455,000 for these entitlements — almost five times the net worth of the median American family. Just imagine having to pay a $455,000 mortgage but not being able to live in the house. Such a crushing debt load puts the nation “on an imprudent and unsustainable long-range fiscal path” that will only worsen as 77 million baby boomers retire. “If the federal government was a private corporation and the same report came out this morning,” Walker said, “our stock would be dropping and there would be talk about whether the company’s management and directors needed a major shake-up.”

Our national stock is dropping. The value of the U.S. dollar has depreciated against almost every other major foreign currency. Anybody who believes that the federal government can continue to spend billions of dollars it doesn’t have is living in a fool’s paradise. Congress is already using the Social Security surplus to pay government operating expenses and “repaying” it with a bunch of IOUs. Of the aforementioned benefit deficit of $53 trillion, $34 trillion is owed for Medicare alone. Seven short years ago, the country’s entire entitlement shortfall stood at $20 trillion.

Walker recommends that all future presidents include a 10-year projection for every item in their annual budget, detailing the full fiscal effect of all current and proposed programs. Using a set of key national indicators as a guide, Congress and the White House must also scrutinize all federal spending, eliminating agencies and programs not producing expected results. Finally, a bipartisan panel similar to the Base Realignment and Closure Commission should be convened to deal with the entitlement crisis. And voters should only support candidates who unequivocally agree to stop squandering our children’s future.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; american; budget; entitlements; federalspending; genx; household; spending; theuglytruth; waste; wheresronny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: qam1; ItsOurTimeNow; PresbyRev; Fraulein; StoneColdGOP; Clemenza; m18436572; InShanghai; xrp; ...

Xer Ping

Ping list for the discussion of the politics and social (and sometimes nostalgic) aspects that directly effects Generation Reagan / Generation-X (Those born from 1965-1981) including all the spending previous generations are doing that Gen-X and Y will end up paying for.

Freep mail me to be added or dropped. See my home page for details and previous articles.  

21 posted on 12/22/2007 8:25:07 AM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
On this subject, Bush is part of the problem, not part of the solution.

Yeah, the President who finally got Soc Security reform on the table as a viable political issue instead of the "issue of death" and introduced the 1st elements for privatization into an entitlement program really is "part of the problem"

22 posted on 12/22/2007 8:25:52 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Hillary Clinton has never done one thing right. She thinks that qualifies her to be President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
On this subject, Bush is part of the problem, not part of the solution.

President Bush attempted to address this in the 1st part of his second term and was stonewalled by Democrats and a good number of Republicans.

23 posted on 12/22/2007 8:31:58 AM PST by xrp (Ron Paul: The RIGHT way to vote for freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ROTB

You pay a high price to be an individual. So few of our Presidents have been individuals.


24 posted on 12/22/2007 8:48:24 AM PST by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Thank you FDR Ping - way to sink the country! I can’t believe we still revere him and his socialist tendency buddies.


25 posted on 12/22/2007 9:23:11 AM PST by mek1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets
We are living in a time of a false economy. If not for the government borrowing vast sums of money to be spent on every conceivable project, the truth of our financial straights would be painfully obvious to all immediately. Even the entitlements are no longer geared to assist retirees, but to get money into the hands of people that will spend it immediately to help mask the precarious situation.

Great post. You have summarized in a nutshell the logic of Keynesian economic theory. Pols like FDR and LBJ translated it into "spend, spend, elect, elect".

Now the government is like a heroin addict that needs to spend more and more to accomplish less and less.

My tagline tells you what I think we can look forward to in the next administration.

:-(


26 posted on 12/22/2007 9:30:07 AM PST by cgbg ("2009-2017: Gnarled and ugly,loud and preachy, fiscally and morally depraved.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I will give anyone in this room the candidate of their choice for President. I don’t care who it is, that person when elected President will not be able to clean this mess up. This system of government is broken. It needs to be scrapped.


27 posted on 12/22/2007 9:35:59 AM PST by Plains Drifter (If guns kill people, wouldn't there be a lot of dead people at gun shows?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

To really study what each American owes, you should then study what each American owns. If you make a list of items that the American government owns and divide it by the number of citizens (what you did with debt)each American would get $1,750,000. I’ll take the difference! I might end up part owner of an aircraft carrier.


28 posted on 12/22/2007 9:49:25 AM PST by Blake#1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Two Words: Bill Me!


29 posted on 12/22/2007 9:55:46 AM PST by Mikey_1962 (Liberals want equality of outcome not opportunity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plains Drifter

Legislation comes from the legislative branch, not the executive.


30 posted on 12/22/2007 9:55:52 AM PST by LowCountryJoe (I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: aroundabout

“The dollar has been far lower then it is today. Back in the 1970’s under the guidance of Jimmah Cahtah”

Is this where we want to be? The same economic conditions that existed then?

“Back then about 25-30% of the entire worlds reserves were in dollars versus about 65% now.”

The reason there has been such a large increase, is the fact that we are carrying such a large trade deficit. The scary thing is the dollar has declined this much in a time of economic growth in our country.


31 posted on 12/22/2007 10:30:01 AM PST by WILLIALAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
Keynesians like FDR and LBJ were bad, but always they faced a Republican Party that shunned Keynesian theory. When Richard Nixon* pronounced himself a Keynesian in 1971, Republican opposition faded.

I see an American generational “ideological war” looming in our future. Much has been said, both pro and con, about Ron Paul in his bid for the White House. Forgetting Paul for the moment, I see something more.

I see a great many young adults supporting Paul’s candidacy due to rightful indignation and fear of the financial burden politicians of earlier generations have planned for them. Among the older Paul supporters I heard them saying their generation must stop spending the inheritance of future generations. The younger supporters are driven by self-preservation, the older supporters by morals.

If I’m wrong, so be it. If I am correct, there will be another “civil war” in America we can only hope will be kept civil. The sides will not be determined by geopolitics, party affiliation, or even ideology as much as by age of the participants. Ron Paul's candidacy is the first battleground.

President Richard M. Nixon, 1971, “We are all Keynesians now.”

32 posted on 12/22/2007 10:54:05 AM PST by backtothestreets (My bologna has a first name, it's J-O-R-G-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LowCountryJoe

That is why i said whatI said.


33 posted on 12/22/2007 11:02:20 AM PST by Plains Drifter (If guns kill people, wouldn't there be a lot of dead people at gun shows?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob
"A delegation of Lakota leaders..."

Leaders in their own mind. They lost elections in the tribe and have no standing, other than wacko activists who get news coverage by reporters who don't fact check press releases. ("Russell Means" should have been a clue it was bogus.)

See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1942933/posts

34 posted on 12/22/2007 11:55:14 AM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
In releasing the federal government’s 2007 financial report at the National Press Club earlier this week, Walker noted that each American household owes $455,000 for these entitlements — almost five times the net worth of the median American family. Just imagine having to pay a $455,000 mortgage but not being able to live in the house.

Ummmm....each household will be receiving $455,000 of these entitlements.

35 posted on 12/22/2007 11:55:27 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WILLIALAL
The scary thing is the dollar has declined this much in a time of economic growth in our country.

How much do you think the dollar has declined? Over what time frame?

36 posted on 12/22/2007 11:58:38 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Go ahead and ruin my delusions with the ice cold water of reality.


37 posted on 12/22/2007 12:27:04 PM PST by BipolarBob (I've been stung by honey bees and bumblebees. I don't want no huckle bee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
each American household owes is set to receive $455,000 for entitlements

I promised to pay my wife $500 million in 2020. My family is doomed, we'll never be able to come up with that much money!

38 posted on 12/22/2007 12:43:56 PM PST by Fan of Fiat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fan of Fiat

Too slow!


39 posted on 12/22/2007 12:49:33 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Fan of Fiat

Dang!


40 posted on 12/22/2007 12:53:32 PM PST by Fan of Fiat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson