Skip to comments.
'Muhammad boys' prove 'Islam will enter every house in Europe'
WND ^
| 12-19-2007
| Aaron Klein
Posted on 12/19/2007 2:08:49 PM PST by Nachum
JERUSALEM Statistical information released yesterday showing Muhammad is the second most popular boys name in Britain "proves Islam is becoming the majority in the UK and will one day enter every house in Europe," a senior terror leader told WND in an interview. "We see from this study of Muhammad's name that Islam is on the rise and cannot be stopped no matter what your crusader governments do," said Muhammad Abdel-Al, spokesman and a leader of the Popular Resistance Committees terror group.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: boys; crushislam; deathcult; enemywithin; europe; infiltration; islam; islamicimperialism; islamiclaw; islamicsupremacist; muhammad; muhammadminions; muslims; thecreepingplague; waronislam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
To: Nachum
And yet the band plays on.
To: tacticalogic
The Ottomans were anything but Islamic fundementalists. The Fundies in WWI were the Hashemites of Jordan and Saudi.
To: PurpleMan
I guess everyone read and believed Paul Ehrlichs The Population Bomb except the Muslims.To populate is to govern!
Beat the Muzzies at their own game, have more babies!
To: HAL9000
2.7% hardly "proves Islam is becoming the majority in the UK", unless "million-man math" is being used.
How's this for math. When 40% of the kids in your schools are Muslim, as is the case in some areas of the Netherlands right now, what do you think their country is going to look like in 20 years?
That 2.7% will grow exponentially considering they're the ones reproducing and the ordinary Brits who make up 90% can't be bothered.
44
posted on
12/20/2007 1:19:55 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(Republicans who support Rudy owe Bill Clinton an apology.)
To: Ulysse
This is the straight result of the active secularism of free-masons Have you ever looked on the back of the dollar bill? ;-)
45
posted on
12/20/2007 1:21:08 PM PST
by
Clemenza
(Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
To: RetiredArmy
I don’t care if Mexicans “take over” as long as they are American “mexicans” who were born or naturalized here. Mexicans are Christians. Yes, there are some serious cultural problems, but most of those are the result of class differences between the people who jump the border (who are mostly from the lower class) and the average American. These problems could be done away with by deporting the illegals. Middle-class and ambitious working-class Mexicans who emigrate here legally are by and large good citizens, and they are welcome in my county, town, and neighborhood.
As for Muslims: I don’t trust them. I wish them no ill, and I feel for the good ones that just want to live in peace, but I don’t trust them. Their culture is incompatible with ours. Ideally, we’d deport them all, but that would require a constitutional amendment (or a state of martial law).
46
posted on
12/20/2007 1:38:11 PM PST
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: B-Chan
Well, you are free to your opinion as I am mine. You can have yours, and I will stick to mine.
47
posted on
12/20/2007 3:39:33 PM PST
by
RetiredArmy
(Better prepare, come Nov 08, we have a Marxist Commissar President and Marxist Congress.)
To: G8 Diplomat
According to data from CACI Information Solutions, men who are named Mohammed are five-and-a-half times more likely to go on holiday in Asia and twice as likely to live in Yorkshire than most other people.
They are also among the most likely to have a digital TV, to live in a household with six or more people and to shop at Asda.
Additionally, a man named Mohammed is most likely to be aged between 25 and 34, have an average salary of £25,000 and will tend to read The Guardian.
http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/book_of_names/article1183264.ece
48
posted on
12/20/2007 4:13:20 PM PST
by
EBH
(Loose lips sink ships.)
To: RetiredArmy
Of course. The difference between my opinion and yours is that mine is correct and yours is not. But, as you say, you have the right to your own opinion, no matter how incorrect it may be. Aprende español, amigo.
49
posted on
12/20/2007 4:24:48 PM PST
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: Doomonyou
concentration camps? Not hardly...they won’t bother with all that hassle.
Just multiply all the Daniel Pearl’s and Nick Berg’s by the millions.
50
posted on
12/20/2007 4:33:13 PM PST
by
tpanther
To: Andrew Byler
The Ottomans were anything but Islamic fundementalists. The Fundies in WWI were the Hashemites of Jordan and Saudi.the reference was more to the immediate post-war years. Ataturk's refomation of Turkish society under a secular governnment, and rejection of traditional Islamic theocracy.
51
posted on
12/20/2007 4:51:54 PM PST
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: B-Chan
Oh, wow, I have never met Mr. Perfect before. Yea, right, you are always right and everyone else is wrong. Sure Mr. Perfect, the only thing you are right about is how wrong you always are. Bean head. You think you are something damned special or something. Right. Sure, Mr. Know It All, Bowinkle J. Moose. That is who you are. Mr. Moose. Turd head.
52
posted on
12/20/2007 8:21:59 PM PST
by
RetiredArmy
(Better prepare, come Nov 08, we have a Marxist Commissar President and Marxist Congress.)
To: RetiredArmy
53
posted on
12/20/2007 8:47:14 PM PST
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: B-Chan
Your showing your liberalism now bean head. I rest my case. You’ve proven it for me. Thanks Bowinkle J. Goodbye, last note to you. You are not worth the effort BJ. Go back to DU coward.
54
posted on
12/20/2007 9:00:35 PM PST
by
RetiredArmy
(Better prepare, come Nov 08, we have a Marxist Commissar President and Marxist Congress.)
To: B-Chan
Oh, and I saw your OTHER THAN HONORABLE DISCHARGE FROM THE U.S. NAVY on your personal page after I made my last post. Long story you say??? No, it was not a long story. It is rather short. You broke the law, the rules or were a failure. Other Than Honorable discharges are given out to those who either did wrong, broke the rules, broke the law, or were utter failures. Mostly, OTH discharges are given to those under charges in a Courts Martial for offenses. They give OTH's to move you on out and get rid of you instead of wasting the money to try you in the court. Simple process, YOU ADMIT YOUR GUILT, as part of the process. Thusly, you got kicked out of the United States Navy as being either unfit, or possible criminal offenses. Which ever, it proves you couldn't cut it or you broke the rules or the law.
In either event, you are not worth my time to argue with further. I stand by my last comment to you in the last post. Coward. Couldn't cut it or you broke the law or the rules. Simple as that. You are not worth the effort. I will spend my time with real heroes. Something you failed to be. You couldn't cut being one of us.
55
posted on
12/20/2007 9:07:09 PM PST
by
RetiredArmy
(Better prepare, come Nov 08, we have a Marxist Commissar President and Marxist Congress.)
To: RetiredArmy
You broke the law, the rules or were a failure. I don't deny it.
56
posted on
12/20/2007 9:27:42 PM PST
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: Andrew Byler
There is always defenestration if needed..
57
posted on
12/20/2007 10:36:56 PM PST
by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson