Posted on 09/22/2007 6:21:10 AM PDT by Jim Noble
WEARE A father attacked his daughter's boyfriend last week after learning the boy had sex with the underage girl, police said.
It was about 1:30 p.m. Monday, Sept. 10, when the man stormed onto the grounds of John J. Stark High School and beat up the 17-year-old from Henniker. School was just letting out, and many students witnessed the attack, said Detective Lou Chatel.
The boy suffered bruising and later received two stitches to his face.
The father was charged with simple assault, a Class B felony.
Police said the boy is dating the man's 15-year-old daughter.
The man discovered the two had had sex earlier that day, during school hours but not on school property, police said.
Under state law, a 15-year-old cannot consent to sex; therefore, police are investigating the allegation as a sexual assault.
The New Hampshire Union Leader has a policy of not identifying sexual assault victims. For that reason, the newspaper is not identifying the father.
Both students attend John Stark High School. The girl lives in Weare.
Chatel said there have been no arrests in the sex case, but he expects there will be.
Boy’s lucky to be alive.
Good for the father.
I sympathize with him. He handled things poorly. He won’t be able to protect his daughter from prison. But I sympathize with him.
Set A Precedent.
The father acted like a man. Very refreshing.
We live in a world in while a 6-year old can be suspended for kissing a classmate.
We live in a world where an 8-year old can be suspended for drawing a picture of a gun.
Here, we have a grown man, storming into a school and beating up a 17-year-old, in front of witnesses, and he isn't arrested?
Our enforcement of policies, and our enforcement of laws seems more and more arbitrary.
I hope I’m on the jury that judges the assault case.
HUH?
Your definition of a man is someone who assaults a child on school property in front of other children?
Dad needed to do it with plausible deniability. If they can’t prove it was him, they can’t convict him!
But that will be here soon enough.
It's an oldie, but a goodie.
Talk about arbitrary.
At age seventeen and fifteen, what we probably have is a twelfth grader dating a tenth grader. Age of consent laws (apparently sixteen in NH) that make it statutory rape between two high school students only two years apart in age are ridiculous. Obviously, teens should be protected by law from sexual advances by true adults, out of high school and with the freedom customary for adults as opposed to high school students.
But some common sense needs to be applied in these situations, and the father seems to place none of the responsibility on his fifteen year-old daughter, who is not a child, and according to rate of maturity for boys and girls, probably near the same maturity level as the boy. Two years of age difference is very common in high school dating.
Another good reason to homeschool. :-)
Me too, having raised a slut, and all.
could you sugar coat it any better
I would have done the same thing as this father did
The instinct to beat up the boyfriend is understandable, but the law does not allow assault in "understandable" situations. It only allows it to protect someone from imminent harm.
The father stormed into the school, and proceeded to beat up a minor in front of witnesses? Lock him up.
Yeah, that was really mean, wasn't it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.