Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Groundbreaking' study shows 'gays' can change
WorldNetDaily ^ | 9/15/07 | WorldNetDaily

Posted on 09/16/2007 10:13:37 AM PDT by wagglebee

In the first longitudinal, peer-reviewed, scientific study of its kind, researchers have concluded some homosexuals can change their "orientation" through religiously mediated guidance.

Researchers Stanton L. Jones and Mark A. Yarhouse released the results Thursday of a three-year study during an address at the American Association of Christian Counselors World Conference.

Their conclusions contradict the claims of the American Psychological Association and the American Psychiatric Association, which contend such change in sexual orientation is impossible and attempting to pursue it likely will cause depression, anxiety or self-destructive behavior.

The new study concluded such changes do not cause psychological harm to the patient.

Nicholas A. Cummings, former American Psychological Association president, praised the research.

"This study has broken new ground in its adherence to objectivity and a scientific precision that can be replicated and expanded, and it opens new horizons for investigation," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: apa; determinism; exgays; exodusinternational; homosexualagenda; perversionisachoice; pfox; psychology; redemption; theirwardrobe; theyneedhelpnothate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: wagglebee

This is encouraging. If gays can change, maybe that means that Mooslims can too. Maybe they can learn to resist their orientation to slaughter innocents and brutally oppress others, especially women.


21 posted on 09/16/2007 11:16:54 AM PDT by Vasilli22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
“religiously mediated guidance” is not needed.

The Red Chinese treated it successfully with electroshock therapy for years.

22 posted on 09/16/2007 11:18:27 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
There is no need to fear the so-called homosexual agenda. Homosexuals are not a danger to us.

Inherently, no. But they are when they decide to affect our culture with theirs. When traditional families are snidely called "breeders" and the foundations our society that have endured for centuries are derided then yes, they are a danger to us. I have known and liked many gay people but it's the militant gay agenda I don't like.

23 posted on 09/16/2007 11:21:58 AM PDT by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Documented proof that Jesus Saves - including from the lifestyle of sin, self-destruction, and pain that is Homosexuality.


24 posted on 09/16/2007 11:23:24 AM PDT by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"Nicholas A. Cummings, former American Psychological Association president, praised the research." Now that he's out, he can tell the truth.
25 posted on 09/16/2007 11:25:14 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

“People don’t choose to be gay.

I don’t have children and am unfamiliar with what is being taught.”

That is what they are being taught.

With no facts to back it up.


26 posted on 09/16/2007 11:28:02 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Aria; Marie2; pandoraou812

The gay activists, while vocal, are a tiny minority of the gay community. Most gays mind their own business.


27 posted on 09/16/2007 11:28:21 AM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Riverman94610
very few kids are going to bend over for Billy unless they were going to do it anyway

Not true. Same-sex attracation is just as much a deformity as a broken leg. Sometimes a leg is broken intentionally. Sometimes messed up relationships lead to same-sex attraction.

28 posted on 09/16/2007 11:28:23 AM PDT by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: davisfh

Sure — and I just saw a pig fly over my house !


29 posted on 09/16/2007 11:28:59 AM PDT by dk/coro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Sorry I can’t agree with you.

http://www.gardenstateequality.org/about.htm


30 posted on 09/16/2007 11:30:55 AM PDT by pandoraou812 ( zero tolerance to the will of Allah ...... dilligaf? with an efg.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Of course this doesn’t pertain to Elton {I’m so Gay} John!


31 posted on 09/16/2007 11:47:31 AM PDT by ustanker (Secure the border!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Respectfully, you could not be more wrong.


32 posted on 09/16/2007 11:53:01 AM PDT by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The APA’s liars; and God can change peole! Simple as that..


33 posted on 09/16/2007 11:53:14 AM PDT by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"We found that 15 percent of our sample of about 100 claimed to actually have changed from homosexuality to heterosexuality," he said. "These people experienced significant enough change that they really felt like they had left one sexual orientation to shift into another."

That's not very earth-shaking. Some of the subjects may not be telling the truth to the investigators or themselves, but it wouldn't be surprising if some people changed in orientation from homosexual to heterosexual or vice versa. Homosexuality isn't all one thing: there are people who've been that way for as long as they can remember and people who "experiment" with it, like college girls who are "lesbians until graduation."

34 posted on 09/16/2007 11:56:05 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble

Most gays are not radical and keep to themselves. They couldn’t care less about gay pride parades.

As for me, I’m straight, and I don’t watch TV shows or movies where the protagonist is gay. I believe in live and let live so I don’t need tolerance shoved in my face.


35 posted on 09/16/2007 12:01:21 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Marie2
They certainly are[a danger to us], when they use their sexual orientation as a basis for political change. They certainly are, when they break down the barriers of appropriate sexual behavior and encourage an “if it feels good, do it” mentality. They certainly are, when they spread serious and fatal illnesses. They certainly are, when they try to infiltrate churches, schools, and society at large with a “homosexual is fine” attitude. They certainly are when they post pornography, or behave pornographically, in public.

Aren't these same "dangers" perpetrated by heterosexual people, too?
36 posted on 09/16/2007 12:01:55 PM PDT by FreedomFromGov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

That is fine with me. I was in the interior design world and the show horse world and there are a lot of gays in both and many were talented and enjoyable people. What goes on with consenting adults is their business, not mine.


37 posted on 09/16/2007 12:22:09 PM PDT by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
The gay activists, while vocal, are a tiny minority of the gay community. Most gays mind their own business.

The activists may be a tiny minority, but they are having a devastating effect. They have pushed their notions of society on this country, and the world, ever since the Stonewall Riots, and the politicians, even mindful of getting elected, go along with their dictates, be it benefits for 'domestic partners', homosexual 'marriage', or the teaching of the 'gay agenda' in schools, even as early as Kindergarten.

Beginning in the early 80's, they used AIDS to create sympathy for themselves, even though it was clear that it was their own actions that brought that disease into their ranks. With this sympathy, they brought about the changes they wanted made, free from much opposition, because the media wouldn't brook any serious discussion on the matter, because to try to do so would be 'homophobic'. Most folks just kept their mouths shut, because they didn't want to be thought ill of by their co-workers, fellow churchgoers, or neighbors.

So that creates a situation in which, as happened in Lexington MA, when a father goes to a teacher and tells her he'd rather his Kindergarten son NOT have to listen to a book about two mommies, or two daddies, and respectfully asks that his son be allowed to go to the library or somewhere else, if that discussion is going to be held. He was arrested, and a restraining order placed on him so that he could not set foot on the school grounds, even for Parent's Night. He wasn't trying to force his beliefs on the school, or make the school change for him, he only wanted the school to accomodate his family's beliefs by exempting his son from discussions of homosexual relationships. The school wouldn't allow it.

38 posted on 09/16/2007 12:22:57 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
He was arrested, and a restraining order placed on him so that he could not set foot on the school grounds, even for Parent's Night. He wasn't trying to force his beliefs on the school, or make the school change for him, he only wanted the school to accomodate his family's beliefs by exempting his son from discussions of homosexual relationships. The school wouldn't allow it.

HOLY MOLY! But you can't mention Jesus.... What was the charge against him...officially? What about freedom of speech? This is what we have to look forward to more of if Hillary - It takes a village - is elected.

39 posted on 09/16/2007 12:28:21 PM PDT by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
So that creates a situation in which, as happened in Lexington MA, when a father goes to a teacher and tells her he'd rather his Kindergarten son NOT have to listen to a book about two mommies, or two daddies, and respectfully asks that his son be allowed to go to the library or somewhere else, if that discussion is going to be held. He was arrested, and a restraining order placed on him so that he could not set foot on the school grounds, even for Parent's Night. He wasn't trying to force his beliefs on the school, or make the school change for him, he only wanted the school to accomodate his family's beliefs by exempting his son from discussions of homosexual relationships. The school wouldn't allow it.

I'm afraid that we live in a nation where rampant political correctness rules. There are too many sacred cows. This is not confined to homosexuality, as you know. :(

40 posted on 09/16/2007 12:33:41 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson