Posted on 09/07/2007 8:18:27 AM PDT by april15Bendovr
Ron Paul refuses to declare war against Al Qaeda terrorists in Iraq.
We have made it clear here at Free Republic that there is irrefutable documentation showing Saddam's WMD program and links to Al Qaeda under this section on the website
PreWarDocs
Ron Paul continues to appease our enemy.
I am officially posting a declaration of war against Ron RuPaul here at Free Republic on behalf of patriotic Americans who support our troops mission in Iraq.
Sounds like an antisemite to me.*****
Sounds like someone who knows what is going on over there. It has been an open secret, for a long time now, that Israel has nuclear weapons. The arab nations know that if push comes to shove, Israel will use its atomic weapons.
My gut feeling is that most Ron Paul supporters come into Free Republic just advertizing.
If they read through the different sections of collected data such as
CitizensReportonIraq
Terrorism
PreWarDocs
They would already know the documents that we stand by rather than explaining exhaustingly to them what we have learned.
Jveritas has been a true patriot and leader in translating Iraqi documents with the Docex Project.
These people have been going on what they feel rather than what they actually know. I'm tired of it.
I take that as an admission that it is the RP haters putting out the venom.
****LOL! That’s why I love these Paul threads - the unintentional humor. If Pat had been the nominee, he wouldn’t have won a single state. Ron Paul can’t even get 5% in the polls and you sit there and criticize candidates who poll in the double digits. Get a clue.*****
Yeah, and no one thought he could win a primary either. I can’t remember a candidate that had more negative press from the MSM ever doing as well as Pat. In a general election, he would have pulled a lot from the Demo base.
****Ron Paul’s traitorous views on foreign policy trump any domestic policies he advocates (which aren’t all that consistent anyway).****
That is your opinion. It seems as though the regular people don’t agree with you considering his growing support among the electorate. He now has over 40,000 activist volunteers on Meetup willing to spend their own money and time to promote his candidacy.
Ron Paul, is not a 9/11 truther. He has repudiated them many times.
Maybe you’ll enjoy the part where he brags about killing 3,000 Americans, got away with it, is enjoying life in Waziristan serving Allah, and urges his followers to kill even more of us soon.”
Bin Laden Quoted from Drudgereport
“You elected the Democratic Party... but the Democrats haven’t made a move worth mentioning. On the contrary, they continue to agree to the spending of tens of billions to continue the killing and war”...
I'm sure in some sick way the Democrats, Ron Paul crowd and Al Qaeda can all agree on that statement.
LOL! Have fun in your war against him... why don’t you support your own candidate instead of tearing down one that would actually shrink the power of the federal government (what conservatism is supposed to be about)....
lol, or hung as said on another thread.. :)
“How do we weed through the adolescent commentary and get to a real discussion of ideology?”
unfortunately, there doesn’t seem to be much of this sort of thing on Ron Paul threads anymore...
What was the TH forum?
Cover up tightly. There are anti-semites under your bed.
Well, I’ve always liked that frontpage statement. :)
However, as far as my understanding goes; there is only one part of that statement where Ron Paul arguably differs:
“...wholeheartedly support the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive strikes on known terrorist states...”
While the rest of the Republican candidates don’t meet a vast number of the listed criteria. Thompson and McCain on the 1st amendment (campaign finance), Romney and Guliani on the 2nd amendment, Guliani on abortion and immigration, Hunter on free trade, Huckbee on taxes and personal freedom (banning smoking), and of course we could go on and on.
So, the way I see it, it makes little sense to ‘declare war’ on a candidate (Paul) who is the best, IMO, in 9/10 areas... Unless the one area of contention is accorded greater weight than the others; something which isn’t clear in the front page statement and is, perhaps, what Nephi was alluding to in his post.
This has to be one of the most disgusting threads I’ve seen to date.
And? Whats is your point please?
Is the Ron Paul crowd disgusting or am I?
Are you with the fold the American tent crowd on fighting terrorism or are you patriotic FReeepers that want to see our troops & surge working with the support of America?
The contents of this thread are disgusting. Nothing but a bunch of attacks on other freepers.
Most folks I know that listen to what Paul has to say also like Duncan Hunter, and Tom Tancredo.
I haven’t made up my mind entirely; I am looking at Tancredo, Paul and Hunter.
BTW, these kinds of threads aren’t going to win anyone over to your point of view. They just p!ss people off.
So, go ahead, and call me a “paulbearer”, or a “paulistinian”, or , hey how about something new; “Paulin”, you know, like “stalin”.
Some of us are trying to figure out what to do exactly with our votes. We want to read, and learn. It’s tough to do when all you see is this garabage.
Go ahead, now, and question my “patriotism”. I know you want to.
We have a candidate in the Republican party that would leave us vulnerable to international terrorism while simultaneously killing the honor of our troops mission in Iraq.
Sorry but that is more disgusting than worrying about what you think.
Perhaps but I doubt it..
No not at all, here are the differences:
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
LMAO
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.