Skip to comments.
Declaration of war against Ron Paul
april15bendovr
Posted on 09/07/2007 8:18:27 AM PDT by april15Bendovr
Ron Paul refuses to declare war against Al Qaeda terrorists in Iraq.
We have made it clear here at Free Republic that there is irrefutable documentation showing Saddam's WMD program and links to Al Qaeda under this section on the website
PreWarDocs
Ron Paul continues to appease our enemy.
I am officially posting a declaration of war against Ron RuPaul here at Free Republic on behalf of patriotic Americans who support our troops mission in Iraq.
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: braindeadzombiecult; breakingnews; cheese; domesticenemy; elephantdump; fauxnews; hairyhands; havefunaloneatwar; heeeeeeeeeeykoolaid; heeeeeeeeeykoolaid; moonies; moose; moronalert; paulestinians; ronaldapplewhite; ronnutters; ronpaul; ronpaulisright; rpiswmd; shrimpfest2007
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 321-339 next last
To: Jim Robinson
Ron Paul has yet to speak out on these associations, one way or the other. A number of his supporters here have said in effect "We can't help it if some goofballs find Ron Paul attractive". Yet, on this thread
More Ron Paul supporter scams! Change Party Affiliation to Republican? their argument is essentially "So what if these people want to vote Republican, doesn't the GOP have a big tent?".
That's playing both ends against the middle. Either RP disclaims all such associations or he lives (and his candidacy dies) by them. He can't have it both ways, and we should hold his feet to the fire.
261
posted on
09/07/2007 1:42:28 PM PDT
by
bcsco
("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
To: tacticalogic
262
posted on
09/07/2007 1:43:07 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: tacticalogic
I have only one account here unlike the half dozen Paulestinians each with four or five seperate accounts.
To: ejonesie22
Dead Americans give less than a tinkers damn about Constitutional arguments...So do some of the live ones, but that doesn't mean I have to join them.
264
posted on
09/07/2007 1:47:12 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: End Times Crusader
I have only one account here unlike the half dozen Paulestinians each with four or five seperate accounts.How many accounts did you have before this one?
265
posted on
09/07/2007 1:49:55 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: Jim Robinson
Well, so be it, if that is the argument you want to believe. I myself find it lacking and would encourage you to heed Peggy Noonan's calls in today's WSJ and engage his arguements:
"Mind our own business, bring our troops home, defend our country, defend our borders". *That* is a conservative argument if I've ever heard one.
regards
266
posted on
09/07/2007 1:52:09 PM PDT
by
Thoreau
To: tacticalogic
I, and people like me, are trying to keep you from joining the former.
Thanks are not needed...
Nor expected...
267
posted on
09/07/2007 1:54:57 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: Thoreau; Jim Robinson
Lovely sentiments...
in 1939...
World is a tick more complex now....
268
posted on
09/07/2007 1:56:51 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: Thoreau
Defeating the Islamic jihadists is our business. Destroying their terrorist organizations before they can attack us again is a matter of our national security.
269
posted on
09/07/2007 1:58:31 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
To: trisham
Believe as you will.We all do. I'm having a hard time buying the argument that Ron Paul is doing this because he wants to destroy this country. If that's what he wanted, he'd be helping subvert the Constitution and every opportunity that promised some political favor in return.
270
posted on
09/07/2007 1:59:07 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: Thoreau
Didn’t know Peggy had a sex change.
271
posted on
09/07/2007 1:59:09 PM PDT
by
listenhillary
(millions crippled by the war on poverty....but we won't pull out)
To: Jim Robinson
Check out
http://dailypaul.com/blog, then scroll down to the 8th heading in the left column under "blogs": "
The Next BIG Challenge: Become a Delegate to the RNC".
There sure appears to be a concerted effort going on to manipulate the GOP primaries and convention. Following the links, one comes to this subpost:
The Republican National Convention could be the first that is brokered in many, many years. What that means is that on the first ballot, no candidate receives 50% + 1 votes. What happens next is that the power players go in the back rooms and start trading votes for promises, etc. Then a second ballot happens on which all delegates are free to vote for whomever they want. Here's an unlikely, but possible scenario where Ron Paul gets nominated. First ballot - Thompson 28%, Rudy 24%, Romney 20%, Paul 18%, others 10%. On the second ballot Rudy loses support from certain committed delegates because he's a RINO. Most delegates who voted for others vote for Paul, some vote for Thompson. Romney loses delegates also. Second ballot - Thompson 30%, Paul 26%, Rudy 20%, Romney 18%, others 4%. Third ballot, other real conservatives dump Romney and Rudy, moving to Paul because Thompson has made some major gaffe. Third ballot - Thompon 36%, Paul 34%, Rudy 16%, Romney 14%. Seeing the handwriting on the wall, Rudy and Romney supporters capitulate, but can't stand Thompson, so go with Paul. Fourth ballot - Paul 52%, Thompson, 42%, Romney 4%, Rudy 2%. QED.
Point: We can look at candidate percentages all we want at this time. But there is a very organized campaign at play and it doesn't only consist of GOP supporters for Ron Paul. We should pay attention to this.
272
posted on
09/07/2007 2:00:22 PM PDT
by
bcsco
("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
To: ejonesie22
I’ll bet you’ll lie to me for my own good, too.
273
posted on
09/07/2007 2:00:49 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
To save your life, you betcha...
274
posted on
09/07/2007 2:02:08 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: George W. Bush
****However, JimRob does have a fundamental instinct toward the most free speech he can grant here at FR. It’s just that some FReepers make it hard for him to do that sometimes without have a circus of flamewars.***
As a veteran of the old flame war days, I can say that I have never seen a thread here that approached that type of flame war. In the flame wars of the early to middle 90’s, it was a balance to see how nasty you could be without getting kicked off the forum. Sorry Freepers, but the old TH forum was the best forum ever on the Internet. I would say that Freepers approached it in the late 90’s. In its last few years, TH became a self regulating forum with virtually no moderators. If a person was a real jerk or A@@hole, people just never responded to his posts and he went away. I would think that if the old TH was still going, the arguments against Ron Paul would be on a much higher intellectual level than what I have seen here. IOW, his opponents would be discussing why his non interventionist policy was incorrect rather than calling him a coward.
275
posted on
09/07/2007 2:02:14 PM PDT
by
jmeagan
(Our last chance to change the direction of the country--Ron Paul)
To: tacticalogic
I'm having a hard time buying the argument that Ron Paul is doing this because he wants to destroy this country.****************
He doesn't want to protect it, which in the end amounts to the same thing.
276
posted on
09/07/2007 2:02:41 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: jmeagan
Actually we manage to do both...
277
posted on
09/07/2007 2:03:40 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: jmeagan
IOW, his opponents proponents would be discussing why his non interventionist policy was incorrect rather than calling him his opponents a coward uneducated, traitors, socialists, add label here________________________________. It goes both ways.
278
posted on
09/07/2007 2:08:13 PM PDT
by
bcsco
("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
To: ejonesie22
To save your life, you betcha...Then I expect just about everything is going to become a matter of life and death.
279
posted on
09/07/2007 2:12:24 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: trisham
He doesn't want to protect it, which in the end amounts to the same thing.Sophistry.
280
posted on
09/07/2007 2:13:06 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 321-339 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson