Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Ham-fisted" and "venemous religious tract": Reviews for "September Dawn"
RottenTomatoes.com ^ | 08/23/07 | Various

Posted on 08/23/2007 5:45:11 PM PDT by Reaganesque

"This handsome indie Western damningly recounts the 1857 slayings of 120 settlers passing through Utah, but the didactic presentation, grim speechifying and tacked-on love story all signify a less-than-healthy regard for the audience's intelligence."
Click for Full Review  Variety   Justin Chang

1/4
1/4 "The film feels less like historical drama than a venomous religious tract printed on celluloid."
Click for Full Review  Minneapolis Star Tribune   Colin Covert

 

"September Dawn has the ham-fisted lyricism of political ads and pharmaceutical commercials."
Click for Full Review  Village Voice   J. Hoberman

 

"When the movie isn't doling out ham-fisted history...it gives us magnificent vistas of a pristine prairie...and there's a deep sweetness to the subplot of Jonathan and Emily falling in love."
Click for Full Review  Film Journal International   Frank Lovece

1.5/4
1.5/4 "When watching the screen depiction of a historic event in which 120 people were murdered, giggling is not the appropriate response."
Click for Full Review  Salt Lake Tribune   Sean Means


1/5 "It has the chilling certitude of the self-righteous."
Click for Full Review  Orlando Sentinel   Roger Moore

2.5/5
2.5/5 "The real problem is that September Dawn isn't a very good movie. It moves too much like a public-school history pageant and gives us mono-dimensional characters who speak dialogue that fairly reeks of printer's ink."
Click for Full Review  Arizona Republic   Richard Nilsen

1/5
1/5 "The jarring MTV-style filmmaking is so distracting and the 'messaging' so unsubtle that after two long hours you find yourself leaving the theater with a massive headache, wondering when you started to hate Mormons."
Click for Full Review  Orlando Weekly   Brett Register

1/4
1/4 "Forget Grindhouse. September Dawn is the year's first honest-to-goodness exploitation flick."
Click for Full Review  Slant Magazine   Nick Schager

1/4
1/4 "Bombastic, slow-drying dramatization with lead-weight dialogue and a turgid romantic subplot."
Click for Full Review  Newsday   Gene Seymour

D-
D- "Has serious problems in historical terms. But in this case they're exacerbated by the simple ineptitude of the filmmaking."
Click for Full Review  One Guy's Opinion   Frank Swietek

"Even if one gets past the movie's controversial depictions, there is the matter of its second-rate, made-for-television fare -- the poor battle choreography, the wooden editing and the cheesy writing."
Click for Full Review  Washington Post   Desson Thomson

2.5/4
2.5/4 "If September Dawn is a kind of Western, it's a Western utterly devoid of heroism or the usual archetypes. But the core message transcends time: Hatred laced with religious fanaticism is a toxic blend."
Click for Full Review  Milwaukee Journal Sentinel   Dave Tianen

1/4
1/4 "Doesn't even measure up to an episode of your typical, cowboy TV show from the Fifties like Roy Rogers or The Lone Ranger. Get my drift, Kimosabe?"
Click for Full Review  NewsBlaze   Kam Williams

Click here for links to the full reviews.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dawn; fistsofhams; hamfisted; hamhamhamham; movie; moviereview; reviews; september; septemberdawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 421-423 next last
To: rodeo-mamma; Poser

Hugh Hewwitt in his Book “A Mormon in the White House” goes into detail about the DNC hit machine doing research on Romney back in 2004. He has been their chief target. (Something that would make any FReeper proud). The movie went into production in 2005. IMO, there may be a link but I don’t know how you would go about proving it.


121 posted on 08/24/2007 8:30:26 AM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Well the film is rated "R" so technically I should not be seeing it. Heck most PG-13 movies are crap nowadays too.

I see Mr. Bean is rated G. It's not much but I like his comedy.

122 posted on 08/24/2007 8:32:29 AM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Dem
some members of the Fancher party DID make those very threats.

It would be more accurate to say that accounts or possibly rumors to this effect spread through SW Utah. Whether they did or did not say such things cannot now be determined. There is no real proof one way or the other.

Similar rumors, or just possibly accurate accounts, of Mormon intentions had a great deal to do precipitating with the mob attacks on Mormons in MO and IL. Is the same mitigation of guilt appropriate in their case, in your opinion?

Imagine Osama Bin Laden traveling through your neighborhood bragging about 9/11, pointing at you and saying "You're next infidel!". You would give him a glass of goat milk and wish him well?

OBL is a criminal and war criminal. I'd never wish him well. However, just because I'd run into OBL wouldn't justify me in getting a group together and slaughtering over 100 random Muslims, including women and children.

123 posted on 08/24/2007 8:49:12 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Scratch a liberal, find a dhimmi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
>>>On the Romney threads I never see any respect given to the victims.

See the link at Post #31. The article linked discusses the effect on the victims and their descendants quite extensively. It also discusses joint memorials raised by the church and descendants of the victims.

I also posted this the other day.

I have no ancestors who were involved in the MMMassacre but feel the shame and guilt based on being a member from the same church. (Not to digress but It shames me that Harry Reid claims Mormon status in the same way I assume it shames some Catholics that Kerry claims to be Catholic).

I guess I just find it hard to let go of. Its like the Church said in their official apology. Nothing justified the murder at MMM.

165 posted on 08/21/2007 4:09:58 PM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

124 posted on 08/24/2007 8:49:46 AM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Dem
how can one get a truthful and factual answer to the real lead time?

For movies that have been issued, especially big hits, you can usually find a timeline for production history. Other, I don't know.

The longest factor in the lead time is often lining up financing. Obvious hits like the Potter movies don't have this problem. Other stories or treatment may spend many years in this phase.

125 posted on 08/24/2007 8:51:42 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Scratch a liberal, find a dhimmi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
>>They say that the movie was in progress before Romney etc.

See post 121. THe DNC was in full swing over a year before the movie went into production in 2005.

126 posted on 08/24/2007 8:54:03 AM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
They had fled the United States for the sanctuary of Mexican Territory, Then, all of a sudden , they were back in it.

Mormon exodus and Mexican War, 1846.

MMM - 1857.

Your account makes it sound like the two events were closely linked in time.

A greater factor was the strife between Brigham Young and the US government at the time, which many on both sides expected to result in all-out war, but which never quite reached that stage.

127 posted on 08/24/2007 8:57:03 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Scratch a liberal, find a dhimmi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Poser
Have you seen the movie?.
128 posted on 08/24/2007 8:59:31 AM PDT by dragonblustar (Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions - G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
>>>>BTW, I find it somewhat amusing that the surname of the director of this crock of steaming cinematic crap is "Cain."

IMDB - Christopher Cain

Date of Birth 29 October 1943, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA

Birth Name Bruce Doggett

_____________________

He change dhis name probably because of the schoolyard kids having a heyday with "Dogget". Why "Cain" I wonder.

129 posted on 08/24/2007 9:03:32 AM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry
Perhaps that is why the LDS Church should open its archives to an independant scholarly committee. Wouldn't that be more appropriate?

Anyone can get access to the church archive. Having said that, the real impetus of your post is that you don't trust LDS scholars. It goes to the common theme in many anti Mormon posters attitude that anyone who is a believing member is either stupid or dishonest. If an independent committee took the time to look at the records and didn't find what you wanted them to find then you'd probably say that the "real records" were hidden from their view. It seems that those against the church will never be satisfied with anything that goes against their prejudicial view.

130 posted on 08/24/2007 9:06:30 AM PDT by sandude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Rameumptom

“”I have no ancestors who were involved in the MMMassacre but feel the shame and guilt based on being a member from the same church. (Not to digress but It shames me that Harry Reid claims Mormon status in the same way I assume it shames some Catholics that Kerry claims to be Catholic). “”

That’s cool, when discussing the massacre, I think it is important for Mormons to remember it was we non Mormon American settlers that were murdered in mass by their church.

About the only argument that Romney supporters should be making is whether or not their religion’s highest leaders were involved,(in relation to the history, not his candidacy of course) it just doesn’t pay to defend the massacre itself by saying that those women and children may have deserved, or needed to be slaughtered.

In conversations about Little Big Horn I appreciate it when people’s tone changes a little bit, when I let them know that I am an army veteran and that as we discuss the battle, we should still remember that we are talking about dead American soldiers.

On these threads I would like it to become more clear that the movie portrays what may be the most horrible event in American history, the mass slaughter of American pioneers by people that only a few years before, would have considered themselves as just like the people they were destroying.


131 posted on 08/24/2007 9:15:50 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
>>>On these threads I would like it to become more clear that the movie portrays what may be the most horrible event in American history, the mass slaughter of American pioneers by people that only a few years before, would have considered themselves as just like the people they were destroying.

The MMM victims did not deserve their fate and were murdered.

I do wonder when Hollywood will do a movie about the 600 Mormons who died at Winter Quarters? Most of them between age 0-5. They signed a peace treaty with the Missouri Mob who took their guns as part of the surrender terms. Then breaking the treaty which said the Mormons would leave the next spring they forced them out at gunpoint in the dead of winter. The women and children and men left a trail of blood in the snow. Many starved and many died of hypothermia. Although it was not a direct "execution" it was a death sentence for over 600 of them.

Most Mormons I have talked to know about MMM and are shamed by it. Most non-Mormons I know have never heard of the mass grave site at Winter Quarters, Omaha.


132 posted on 08/24/2007 9:30:42 AM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: sandude
Anyone can get access to the church archive.

Do you stake you reputation on that? Will Bagley is a non-mormon author that has studied extensively on the Mountain Meadows Massacre and has published this most comprehensive book to date Blood of the Prophets. Was he given free access to the archives?

Having said that, the real impetus of your post is that you don't trust LDS scholars. It goes to the common theme in many anti Mormon posters attitude that anyone who is a believing member is either stupid or dishonest.

Your bigotry against ex-mormons is very readily apparent to outsiders reading your post. Outsiders don't fear, nor label "anti-Mormons." That term is used to keep believing members of the LDS Church from reading any material that might not show them in a good light. So thanks for the compliment even though you didn't mean for your comment to be one.

133 posted on 08/24/2007 9:37:49 AM PDT by colorcountry (Silence isn't always golden.....Sometimes it's just yellow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Rameumptom

“I do wonder when Hollywood will do a movie about the 600 Mormons who died at Winter Quarters? “

I don’t know, but it has nothing to do with a film about these victims, that were killed not by nature, but by religious murderers.


134 posted on 08/24/2007 9:46:20 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Rameumptom
I do wonder when Hollywood will do a movie about the 600 Mormons who died at Winter Quarters? Most of them between age 0-5.

I think Hollywood will make that movie as soon as they think it might make money. Now as far as the 600 dead, Rameumptom...

Please provide a link to this information, along with the year of death. The fated Martin and Willy handcart Company (that has death tolls often atributed to the mobs) left St. Louis a full 9 years after the expulsion of the saints from Missouri. If anyone is to be blamed for their deaths....it is Brigham Young for allowing such a stupid "perpetual emigration" plan that allowed the members of his Church to start out accross the praries ill equipped, with handcarts and too late in the season for safety.

135 posted on 08/24/2007 9:48:32 AM PDT by colorcountry (Silence isn't always golden.....Sometimes it's just yellow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Rameumptom

For what it is worth these people say it was about half of the figure you told us.
http://www.lds.org/placestovisit/location/0,10634,1837-1-1-1,00.html


136 posted on 08/24/2007 10:04:19 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Rameumptom

“”
I do wonder when Hollywood will do a movie about the 600 Mormons who died at Winter Quarters? Most of them between age 0-5. They signed a peace treaty with the Missouri Mob who took their guns as part of the surrender terms. Then breaking the treaty which said the Mormons would leave the next spring they forced them out at gunpoint in the dead of winter. The women and children and men left a trail of blood in the snow. Many starved and many died of hypothermia. Although it was not a direct “execution” it was a death sentence for over 600 of them.””

I didn’t know about the event so I am having to google it, reading what this site has to say is starting to make me doubt you.

http://lds.org/gospellibrary/pioneer/13_Winter_Quarters.html


137 posted on 08/24/2007 10:16:42 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry
Do you stake you reputation on that?...Was he given free access to the archives?

I was only providing the link showing the rules involved to get access to the archives. I found nothing there to indicate that a researcher couldn't get access to the records. I will go to the link you provided and read what Will Bagley has to say on the subject.

Your bigotry against ex-mormons is very readily apparent to outsiders reading your post.

I think bigoted is way too strong a term. I do have a problem with those who refuse to acknowledge that there is more than one side to the story. I would label those people on either the pro or con side of the issue as "closed minded". It seemed from your post that you would not accept the forthcoming book because it is being written by LDS historians. What is your opinion of LDS scholarship?

Outsiders don't fear, nor label "anti-Mormons." That term is used to keep believing members of the LDS Church from reading any material that might not show them in a good light.

What label should I use for those who attack the church on a regular basis here? It is just a label that I use without passion. My desire is for a balanced and honest telling of Mormon history. I've stated many times that one sided histories, either pro or con, are of no use when trying to get to the truth of the matter at hand. In my initial post on this thread I expressed my hope that the upcoming book on MMM would be honest and definitive. I feel this would help heal the wounds of this tragic event.

So thanks for the compliment even though you didn't mean for your comment to be one.

I wasn't trying to upset you. I was hoping for a measured response.

138 posted on 08/24/2007 10:22:00 AM PDT by sandude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
No, but when 10 (and counting) other reviewers say pretty much the same thing as the four critics you mention, I tend to think there might be something to it.

HMMmm...

Then, by the same logic, you tend to think there's something to the fact that THOUSANDS of Chrstians say the LDS organization is NOT Christian?

139 posted on 08/24/2007 10:23:06 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
No, but when 10 (and counting) other reviewers say pretty much the same thing as the four critics you mention, I tend to think there might be something to it.

HMMmm...

Then, by the same logic, you tend to think there's something to the fact that THOUSANDS of Chrstians say the LDS organization is NOT Christian?< P>It just shows how much they HATE us!

--MormonDude(unloved)

140 posted on 08/24/2007 10:25:07 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 421-423 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson