Posted on 08/18/2007 7:48:42 AM PDT by Zender500
How would you like to ask the pro-choice mob a question that is guaranteed to have them jumping around like worms on a hot rock? Well, read on.
Three facts are important to know. First, though there are certainly members of the gay community who are pro-life, go to any large public event put on by the pro-choice gang, or read any edition of the NOW Times or MS Magazine, and you will see that the “mainstream” homosexual lobby and the “mainstream” abortion lobby are joined at the hip.
Second, the current “enlightened” and “politically correct” view is that homosexuality is not a choice but a function of genetics. While I am not convinced this is true, if it is then it is only a matter of time before scientists identify the genetic marker for homosexuality.
Third, the abortion lobby has made it clear that they will never back away from their fundamental assertion that the reasons for abortion are no ones business except the women who have them.
In light of these three facts, let’s ask our enemies one simple and completely appropriate question: Should it be legal for a woman to kill her unborn child solely because there is genetic evidence that the child may turn out to be gay?
When you ask that question, their only options are to either abandon their basic position or risk alienating one of their most loyal support groups. We should also keep in mind that these people have failed this sort of test before. You may recall that standing-up for the disabled was, at one point, sold as an integral part of the liberal agenda. But the first time that effort conflicted with the abortion license, the Godless Left did not hesitate for one moment to throw the disabled under the bus.
The result is that, for example, in America today over 90 percent of babies with Down syndrome are killed in the womb. In fact, legalized abortion has so decayed American society that abortion is now the default position for women carrying a child with even the most insignificant abnormalities. In our brave new world, if a new mom delivers a handicapped baby she better be prepared to routinely answer the question, “Didn’t your doctor tell you about this while you were still pregnant?”
That sorry question and all it implies is part of the “better-dead-than-disabled” mentality that now infects our country. And make no mistake about it, that mindset is the sole responsibility of the pro-choice mob and it has helped them sell lots of abortions. To one degree or another, it has also created a rift between them and those who truly care about the disabled.
Whatever the consequences, it is pretty clear that the Choice Mafia is not going to turn off this path. They have apparently decided that they cannot afford to say that any woman should be denied her “right to choose” for any reason. If a “homosexual gene” is ever identified, the bloodbath they are currently prosecuting against Down syndrome and other “imperfect” children will be expanded to include those who might turn out to be gay. In fact, we may discover that parents are actually more likely to have a potentially gay child killed than one with Down syndrome.
If the homosexual lobby has not yet thought about this issue, it’s time they did. We need to show them that when the American holocaust turns its attention in their direction, it will be their pro-choice buddies who not only defend it but carry it out.
We should also introduce the reality that this phenomenon is not going to be limited to homosexuality. Some scientists are now speculating that genetics may influence people to embrace certain political ideologies. So imagine that someday a conservative, but otherwise pro-choice, organization launches a campaign to encourage – not force or require but simply encourage – pregnant women to kill any fetus they are carrying who is identified as having a politically liberal genetic marker. Would these pro-choice death-merchants have any problem with that?
If you analyze what genetic scientists are now suggesting, the possibilities for this line of dialog are endless. If it is true that virtually every person born into the world is a potential member of a group that could be genetically identified, that means they could be targeted for extinction through abortion.
The bizarre part of this is that, if we press this issue to its logical conclusion, the abortion lobby may be forced to adopt a completely different “abortion-justification” argument. Instead of saying that women should be allowed to abort for any reason whatsoever, they may have to say that the only women who should be allowed to abort are those who are doing so for no reason whatsoever.
My wife has worked with disabled kids. She says the Downs syndrome babies are very sweet, stubborn as all get out, and can function on their own in group homes. Very lovable. The heartbreak for the parent is that they die so young, usually around 30, not that they live.
You can buy Gay Jeans at The GAP................
It hasn't been for the lack of trying. But the textbooks are already written, they say it is genetic so it must be. Anyone with any doctorate degree has been so indoctronated.
My cousin has down syndrom. She was not suppose to live with all her problems, but she is well into her 40's now and doing well. Very sweet girl with a great memory about people and a joy to be around.
Were we not just told a couple of weeks ago that the Spartans "Trained" their soldiers to be homosexual so that they would fight to protect their lovers in the same foxhole?
So which is it, a genetic trait or a learned behavior?
Of course, Spartans didn't utilize foxholes in battle, but no matter...
The problem with the homosexual movement is that they hate christians more than they hate extremists muslims.
That is the main reason the left sympathsizes with radical Islam, their level of hatred towards Christians and Jews are very similar.
Won't need any such organization. Liberal women are already aborting themselves out of future progeny.
Now, If we can just isolate the Liberal gene this problem would be self regulating.
The few gay pro-lifers are pro-life for this very reason.
They reported us to the local council etc etc. They sold their house and moved and no doubt thought who they had sold it to would cause us problems.
The house now has 3 Downs Syndrome lads and a girl who although describes herself as a client I would think she is really there to oversee them and also assist in her rehabilitation I suspect she is a recovering druggie.
We have not had one minute of problems with these lads or girl apart from one getting rather agitated when knocking on our door because his ball had gone into our garden and he wanted it back. Actually it was a shuttlecock.
Researchers will be unable to get grant funding to develop a prenatal test for genetic predisposition towards homosexuality. Any researcher who announces such a test will be attacked. Any lab offering to process such a test will be firebombed by gay activists
One has to wonder... is there a liberal gene? And if one is discovered, will all liberals become prolife overnight?
I have a Downs grandchild. Everything you say is so true. Has two normal siblings.
Both gays and the NAGS are predominantly anti family. That they join forces is no surprise. Both groups are abominations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.