Posted on 08/18/2007 7:48:42 AM PDT by Zender500
How would you like to ask the pro-choice mob a question that is guaranteed to have them jumping around like worms on a hot rock? Well, read on.
Three facts are important to know. First, though there are certainly members of the gay community who are pro-life, go to any large public event put on by the pro-choice gang, or read any edition of the NOW Times or MS Magazine, and you will see that the mainstream homosexual lobby and the mainstream abortion lobby are joined at the hip.
Second, the current enlightened and politically correct view is that homosexuality is not a choice but a function of genetics. While I am not convinced this is true, if it is then it is only a matter of time before scientists identify the genetic marker for homosexuality.
Third, the abortion lobby has made it clear that they will never back away from their fundamental assertion that the reasons for abortion are no ones business except the women who have them.
In light of these three facts, lets ask our enemies one simple and completely appropriate question: Should it be legal for a woman to kill her unborn child solely because there is genetic evidence that the child may turn out to be gay?
When you ask that question, their only options are to either abandon their basic position or risk alienating one of their most loyal support groups. We should also keep in mind that these people have failed this sort of test before. You may recall that standing-up for the disabled was, at one point, sold as an integral part of the liberal agenda. But the first time that effort conflicted with the abortion license, the Godless Left did not hesitate for one moment to throw the disabled under the bus.
The result is that, for example, in America today over 90 percent of babies with Down syndrome are killed in the womb. In fact, legalized abortion has so decayed American society that abortion is now the default position for women carrying a child with even the most insignificant abnormalities. In our brave new world, if a new mom delivers a handicapped baby she better be prepared to routinely answer the question, Didnt your doctor tell you about this while you were still pregnant?
That sorry question and all it implies is part of the better-dead-than-disabled mentality that now infects our country. And make no mistake about it, that mindset is the sole responsibility of the pro-choice mob and it has helped them sell lots of abortions. To one degree or another, it has also created a rift between them and those who truly care about the disabled.
Whatever the consequences, it is pretty clear that the Choice Mafia is not going to turn off this path. They have apparently decided that they cannot afford to say that any woman should be denied her right to choose for any reason. If a homosexual gene is ever identified, the bloodbath they are currently prosecuting against Down syndrome and other imperfect children will be expanded to include those who might turn out to be gay. In fact, we may discover that parents are actually more likely to have a potentially gay child killed than one with Down syndrome.
If the homosexual lobby has not yet thought about this issue, its time they did. We need to show them that when the American holocaust turns its attention in their direction, it will be their pro-choice buddies who not only defend it but carry it out.
We should also introduce the reality that this phenomenon is not going to be limited to homosexuality. Some scientists are now speculating that genetics may influence people to embrace certain political ideologies. So imagine that someday a conservative, but otherwise pro-choice, organization launches a campaign to encourage not force or require but simply encourage pregnant women to kill any fetus they are carrying who is identified as having a politically liberal genetic marker. Would these pro-choice death-merchants have any problem with that?
If you analyze what genetic scientists are now suggesting, the possibilities for this line of dialog are endless. If it is true that virtually every person born into the world is a potential member of a group that could be genetically identified, that means they could be targeted for extinction through abortion.
The bizarre part of this is that, if we press this issue to its logical conclusion, the abortion lobby may be forced to adopt a completely different abortion-justification argument. Instead of saying that women should be allowed to abort for any reason whatsoever, they may have to say that the only women who should be allowed to abort are those who are doing so for no reason whatsoever.
My sons often serve Mass with a boy in his teens who has Down’s Syndrome. He has four older brothers, all in the military, and often brings G.I. Joe figures to Mass when he’s not scheduled to serve, because they remind him of his brothers.
It’s inspiring to watch him at the altar, because, if he’s not busy handing things to Father, he just gazes at the Crucifix with the most joyful and loving expression. It reminds me that every one of us is broken, “disabled” in some way - it’s just that some can pretend they aren’t because our problems don’t necessarily show on the outside.
Choice Mafia is good, but I think "Death Eaters" was even more appropriate. (Don't remember who suggested it ...)
Hmmmm... Good one but I still prefer Choice Mafia simply because they really are death mobsters. Hey, that’s another good one!
The Gay Gene
I haven’t been in The Gap for a while..........They must have really gone UPSCALE!..........
They have shuttlecocks? You have pigeons, they have shuttlecocks, fair trade.
Now that's a winner! I think it's important to emphasize "death," because that's what they're really after, not "choice."
I've always suspected that this was God's way of seeing that the Down Syndrome babies didn't outlive their parents and thus be a burden on someone else.
I agree. Death Mobsters it is!
Regular mobsters, by comparison, want money, and death is just a sideline :-).
Feminism, diversity, hate crimes, the homosexual movement, race problems, anti-Christianity, etc., are all strategies of the left to destroy and confuse our values and foment disunity in our society. It is the divide and conquer tactic at its base.
Feminism, diversity, hate crimes, the homosexual movement, race problems, anti-Christianity, etc., are all strategies of the left to destroy and confuse our values and foment disunity in our society. It is the divide and conquer tactic at its base.
___________________________________________________
With God and family rejected and the state embraced.
Yes, but usually the step before that is total anarchy and chaos so that the people demand and then embrace a strong leader to end the turmoil and restore “order.” That, then, is the State with a Great Leader whose portrait is everywhere and is revered as a god.
Heh. Go to war. Kiss your wife and your children and take them to church on Sunday. Drop a goodly amount in the collection plate and then later in the week support a conservative candidate with time or money. It’s a lot less than other generations have had to do . . .
I agree. The greatest threat is the enemy within - Democrats, the media, unions of all sorts, teachers and professors, 527 organizations funded from abroad, ect.
Google Communists Goals and The Frankfurt School and watch it slowly unfold into the present.
God didn’t plan on the welfare state, essentially all severely retarded kids are paid for by the rest of us from day one. Parental involvement is usually limited to lawsuits against the local school system demanding that their precious child be better kept out of their hair on the few holidays that babysitting is not provided.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.