Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shattering the Bell Curve; The power law rules. (Review of <i>The Black Swan</i>- not IQ related
Opinion Journal ^ | April 24, 2007 | DAVID A. SHAYWITZ Author of review

Posted on 04/24/2007 6:04:47 PM PDT by Excellence

< snip >In "The Black Swan"--a kind of cri de coeur--Mr. Taleb struggles to free us from our misguided allegiance to the bell-curve mindset and awaken us to the dominance of the power law. The attractiveness of the bell curve resides in its democratic distribution and its mathematical accessibility. Collect enough data and the pattern reveals itself, allowing both robust predictions of future data points (such as the height of the next five people to enter the room) and accurate estimations of the size and frequency of extreme values (anticipating the occasional giant or dwarf. The power-law distribution, by contrast, would seem to have little to recommend it. Not only does it disproportionately reward the few, but it also turns out to be notoriously difficult to derive with precision. The most important events may occur so rarely that existing data points can never truly assure us that the future won't look very different from the present. We can be fairly certain that we will never meet anyone 14-feet tall, but it is entirely possible that, over time, we will hear of a man twice as rich as Bill Gates or witness a market crash twice as devastating as that of October 1987. The problem, insists Mr. Taleb, is that most of the time we are in the land of the power law and don't know it. < end snip >

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 2007; bcw; blackswan; blackswanevent; books; chance; ebola; elections; globalwarming; history; isolatedincidents; karlpopper; nassimtaleb; nissamtaleb; philosophy; powerlaw; powerless; predictability; predictions; probability; rarity; risk; singularevents; taleb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Truly, a beautifully-written review. Go to Amazon.com and read the forward of the book. If I understand what I have read so far, this book would help tear apart the "knowledge" behind the climate models, which cannot even "predict" the past.
1 posted on 04/24/2007 6:04:53 PM PDT by Excellence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Excellence
The author, Mr. Nassim Nicholas Taleb, has an impressive c.v.

I just had to check it out because a) I was certain that he has an arabic or near Arabic name, but.

b) I was more certain that his book could not have been written by someone who grew up among muslims, or educated as a muslim, nor living even remotely in a muslim-controlled environment.

2 posted on 04/24/2007 6:45:44 PM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excellence
Thank you for posting this. I will be adding this book to my collection. It sounds like he has managed to explain clearly something I have sensed but have been frustrated as how to communicate.
3 posted on 04/24/2007 6:51:38 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Mobile phones kill more people than exploding cupboards, ironing boards and Godzilla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

I ordered this book this morning as soon as I read the Wall Street Journal editorial.

It is the answer to anyone who thinks they can predict the future! Like ferinstance, democrats who know what social security will be like 25 years from now.


4 posted on 04/24/2007 6:52:03 PM PDT by maica (America will be a hyperpower that's all hype and no power -- if we do not prevail in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maica
It is the answer to anyone who thinks they can predict the future! Like ferinstance, democrats who know what social security will be like 25 years from now.

... and keep adding beneficiaries that have contributed little or nothing to the system, nor are entitled to benefits any more than al qaeda is...

5 posted on 04/24/2007 6:54:54 PM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

An Arabic first and last name with Nicholas as a middle name indicates a Christian Arab. He may well have grown up “among” Mohammedans but his worldview would be very different.


6 posted on 04/24/2007 6:58:38 PM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maica

I ordered it from Wal-Mart for $16.80. I can hardly wait to get my hands on it.


7 posted on 04/24/2007 7:37:23 PM PDT by Excellence (Three million years is enough! Stop cyclical climate change now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

What does this have to do with black swans?


8 posted on 04/24/2007 9:39:14 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Until Val Kilmer made "The Saint", the phrase "The Roger Moore one was better" was never used)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

quote:

the rare but pivotal events that characterize life in the power-law world. He calls them Black Swans, after the philosopher Karl Popper’s observation that only a single black swan is required to falsify the theory that “all swans are white” even when there are thousands of white swans in evidence.


9 posted on 04/24/2007 10:22:37 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Excellence
If you are slightly faster than all other runners you will tend to win every race ... not just slightly fewer.

If your business model is slightly better than that of all your competitors you will eventually get most of the customers ... not just a few more.

If you look at undirected things such as average heights of humans then you will get average bell-curve results.

If you look at directied things such as people wanting to pay the lowest price or companies wanting to run at the lowest cost, then you will often get non-linear feedback.

If taller people were generally more desirable and it was relatively easy to control your height, then not even height would not follow a bell-curve.

10 posted on 04/24/2007 10:34:55 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad
But what is rare or unusual about a black swan?


11 posted on 04/25/2007 2:11:55 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Until Val Kilmer made "The Saint", the phrase "The Roger Moore one was better" was never used)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
"slightly faster"

A point I have been making for years. For a long time people have assumed that dominant athletes, for example, are far superior to their competitors when in fact, like Tiger Woods, they are only maybe a few percentage points better if that. But those few percentage points translate into dominance. Nevertheless even Woods doesn't win every tournament. If it can be measured accurately that I am five percent better than my opponent in let's say tennis, I will thrash him virtually every time. Even being just one percent better would allow me to win better than two thirds of my matches.

12 posted on 04/25/2007 2:46:18 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: driftless2
Exactly. Because everyone's performance can vary a bit over time. So each person has a distribution and sometimes Tiger's performance is on the downside of his distribution while Phil Mickelson's performance is on the upside of his and Phil wins.

But by and large Tiger will win when he competes.

13 posted on 04/25/2007 11:14:54 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

just getting done listening to it on CD. Very interesting. Ideas that I think lots of us have had. I’m going to listen to it again though. Although he repeats himself, his ideas are counter-culture (in the broadest sense), maybe even counter-nature, that I have to listen / read parts of it several times for his ideas to sink in.

I love the fact that he rips into all the social sciences so much.


14 posted on 12/24/2007 10:41:54 PM PST by Murtyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excellence
I always thought the Bell Curve related to the relationship of XsubC vs XsubR.
15 posted on 12/24/2007 10:49:35 PM PST by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
It's mostly a function of sample size and an adequately random sampling method. If you impose any kind of selectivity, you are certain to skew the distribution. Las Vegas (or any gambling establishment) understands how to play the odds in a subtle manner. The overall odds are always in favor of the house. They allow enough "black swans" to keep the rest of the fools filling their pockets.
16 posted on 12/24/2007 11:09:01 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

thanks, bfl


17 posted on 12/25/2007 9:36:43 PM PST by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

The Ozzie edition is called "The White Swan".

18 posted on 12/26/2007 4:29:21 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Being an idealist excuses nothing. Hitler was an idealist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Excellence; All
In late April (2007), Taleb was interviewed by Russ Roberts in a hour long Podcast where Taleb discusses a few key ideas in his book. You can go here to listen to this Podcast and you can also read comments from people who had listened to it.
19 posted on 12/26/2007 4:36:30 AM PST by LowCountryJoe (I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excellence
I'm sorry, anyone working with modeling of physical processes characterized by random variables is perfectly aware of the limitations of assumptions of linearity and stationarity, as well as the entire issue of model adequacy. In spite of the somewhat dismissive tone of the article, where linearity, stationarity and normality ("Gaussian-ness") apply they work superbly. The fact that some people become infatuated with their models at the expense of common sense (or more correctly lose sight of the underlying assumptions) says more about human hubris than any flaws in the models.

This criticism, such as it is, of classical analysis rings tinny in my ear. It reminds me of Lucy van Pelt telling Linus "If Beethoven's so great, why isn't his picture on a bubble gum card."

Which is precisely why Beethoven isn't on a bubble gum card and Gauss' name will be remembered long after Mr. Taleb has passed into well deserved obscurity.

20 posted on 12/26/2007 4:47:41 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Being an idealist excuses nothing. Hitler was an idealist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson