Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.
One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.
All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.
FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?
Do you really expect me to do that?
Makes your head spin. Doesn’t it?
Whew!
What the shiite, why not. Can't hurt. Might work.
Might solve TWO problems.
I am getting a terrible case of giggles.
Oh, they don't wear pants in the Sunni side of France...
I wouldn’t even presume that the leftists would favor cutting a fetus from it’s mother to implant in another woman (at least they would never admit it publicly).
It’s sick and anyone who would condone it is either very disturbed or a troll.
When I say “I want to end abortion as it is today and see to it that no more death occurs for the unborn” , and then someone says I am for “infantcide”.....There is not a misunderstanding in my writing.....there is a lack of comprehension by the reader..... Or direct and intentional misleading occuring because someone doesn’t like what I write.
Deep?
LOL!
Outlawing abortion finds validity because murder is wrong.
So how's the research coming?
:)
It sounds like you have heard of how aspirin prevents pregnancy.
How? Take one aspirin and place between legs, do not remove until the moment has passed.
I ask you again mom, what am I not answering? I do have alot of posts to answer and I can only go one at a time.
Where do you find in my words that I want to continue a “slaughter of the innocent”? I want no such thing and have said so many times.
Yeah. I was!
:)
And put an asprin between your knees!
How ya doin?
OK, thank you for finally coming out and stating your position on abortion in today’s world, because honestly, it was almost impossible to figure out your take on it without reading through your sci-fi hypothetical.
I think your position is ridiculous. You say there are two competing parties, woman and baby, yet you are making no distinction between the kinds of rights involved. A woman carrying the pregnancy to term only has nine months of her life affected if she gives it up for adoption. The baby, on the other hand, has its entire life taken away. Those are in way two equally balanced interests.
No - that theme has been studiously avoided, even under intense questioning.
LOL!!!!!!!!!
*sniff, sniff*
Is that ozone I smell?
That should read, Those are in NO way two equally balanced interests.
One at a time, just like I said. Wouldn’t want someone of accusing me of not responding to comments made to me.....
Hmmm in #8583 I said...
You’re a very young male, right?
And then in one of your posts to one of the other FReepers you said you were a man and couldnt get pregnant...
Now you finally answer my # 8583 by saying...
“Not hardly.”
It appears that taking notes as you go might well keep your stories straight...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.