Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.
One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.
All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.
FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?
Do you really expect me to do that?
You are most welcome...
and now for a cuppa tea...
:)
Thank you, miss.
;0)
NO! And I agree with you completely on this issue. Many thanks!
Bump for later.
“””””I’m particularly relieved to note the absence of certain members I vividly recall clashing with over Terri. Never forgot their names, or their glee about her death. Good riddance to that scum......””””
Hi SS - As a newbie, I remember having to juggle about 6 of them on a Terri thread...there was so much incoming I was shaking with anger. They had no position of principle, just their usual one line pop offs and personal insults, flaunting her death - it was despicable.
sod
You told me about this thread. Remember?
Ha! This thread is still kicking ass!
LOL,,,Bump Dat...;0)
ok, later.
the republican party is pro life, it always has been
http://www.gop.com/media/2004platform.pdf here it is in black and white.
Fire up the bugzapper again. They’re back.
Terri being left to die by court decree, being dehydrated and starved, left me depressed for weeks afterwards. I’m still not really over it. I see threads occasionally with her name and just don’t want to relive that memory.
I remember Rush playing clips from dr. K that really didn’t sound that much different then what they were saying. Still makes me sick, it was so twisted.
I can sort of understand the public that only had the “fact”s the MSM fed them falling differently on this then i did, but Freepers had the facts. And still the social liberals lied and pushed for her to die. Even if they really believed she WAS dead in spirit, why the rush to kill her? If it was just an empty vessel, why couldn’t the body wait a few months and allow her to be examined by more objective people?
No, they couldn’t do that because it wasn’t really about Terri. It was about promoting a pro-death culture and her body was their “trophy’. For their political cause the body had to die.
A glaring case in point: The UK conservative Tory Party. The Tory leader, David Cameron, ordered up a new party logo and made it "green" on purpose.
The once substantial lead the Tories held to overturn the Blair socialist/liberal Labor Party majority is now down the tubes. Labor, which forced Toni Blair to turn over party control early because he was so unpopular, is now considering "snap elections" and doubling their parliamentary majority.
The Tory leadership sold out to socialist programs.
Perhaps MadIvan was right to leave.
yitbos
Haven’t we had enough of tearing at each other’s throats? Yelling for the bugzapper and squealing with glee as the FReeperitically incorrect are banned is counterproductive to the conservative cause. We need a little more unity and a little less division. Perhaps trying to make an argument through debate and logic is a better course of action than a kneejerk call for the bugzapper?
I’m leaning towards Fred Thompson right now. There will never be a perfect candidate, but he seems like our best shot.
B
U
M
P
Listen to Bud Light's Real Men of Genius "Mr. Backyard Bug Zapper Inventor."
Me too. There are two imperatives in 2008. First, I believe there is nothing more important to the national security and sovereignty of the USA than keeping the Clintons out of the WH, regardless of who the GOP candidate is. Preventing the election of Obama is second, albeit very, very critical. I hope all of us here would be able to hold our noses and vote Rudy, or whomever, to forestall either the Clintons or Obama in the WH. It’s that big.
BUMP
BTTT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.