There's a reason for that.
Posted on 04/07/2007 12:43:32 PM PDT by ricks_place
Edited on 04/07/2007 8:05:08 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Wearing her scarf of female submission, US Democrat Speaker of the House entered Islamic Syria during the week prior to Easter. Many of us were surprised that she didn't don a full burqa. Speaking for the new US Democrat Shadow Government, after her talks with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Pelosi told Syria's President Bashar al-Assad (and the worldwide press) that Israel was "ready to engage in peace talks" with the terrorist nation. Wow! All it took was a woman (as a strong side note-women are considered to be below beasts of burden in fundamentalist Islamic-run countries) to settle the problems in the Middle East. If only we'd tried this sooner the world could have avoided all of the bloodshed and wars that have been ongoing for multiple decades between Israel and terrorist Islamic countries!
The only problem with San-Fran-Nan's proud proclamation is that Israel's position has not changed from that which it held before Madame Pelosi began her Middle Eastern Peace-at-any-cost Tour. After Pelosi had, essentially, announced to the world that she had virtually and single-handedly begun the end to all crises in the Middle East, the Olmert administration said that until Syria stopped its support of terrorist groups (which include Hamas, Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad) there would be no peace talks. Olmert's office also issued the statement: "What was communicated to the US House speaker does not contain any change in the policies of Israel." But, the intrepid, if clueless, first female Speaker of the US House of Representatives continues to plow onward-paying no attention to reality. In fact, this is yet another blatant attempt of the Democrats to establish their alternative foreign courses of action-in opposition to official United States foreign policy. This latest Democrat action speaks loudly and surely of another infamous appeaser-Neville Chamberlain.
Why would Pelosi and her supporting and ongoing leftist Democrat-sponsored attempted coup of the US presidency engage in such right-next-to-treasonous (and in defiance of the 1799 Logan Act) behaviors? I believe there is a very simple, if not atrocious, answer. Just as Democrats (and some RINOs) work diligently to garner the votes of illegal aliens, Ms. Pelosi seems bound and determined to now win the hearts and minds-and votes-of the terrorist factions within the USA.
The Democratic Party - Pandering to the terrorist vote nearly as long as the New York Times
Does this mean Nancy wants to be President and without a vote?
Pretty bad stutter there, old partner!
Pelosi was intentionally and contumaciously attempting to twist the speakers position in a prime minister position. Essentially like Parliaments of Europe where the opposition party is set up as a second place government. Places where there may be a largely ceremonial president.
The MSM is overwhelming in their silence and ignorance on this issue. The foreign media is playing this up as a parliamentary shadow government.
The Old York Times and DNC is redundant!
Pray for W and Our Troops
“And the Pres. is too much of a gentleman to go after her.”
I think he is too much of a dimwit to go after her, and he shows that by the fact that he doesn’t go after them when time and again they have broken the law.
With the plastic surgery she has had done over the years, she could look like Michael Jackson if she wanted.........
If President Bush and his administrati0n had any courage at all, they would be prosecuting this traitor.
BURQA GIRL sing-along on YouTube - http://youtube.com/watch?v=iumR_WB3HO0
I know I’m writing my own script here, and this may be wishful thinking, but somehow I can see Fred Thompson standing in front of Pelosi before she took that trip and saying, ‘Go head. But if you do, you have to know up front (little lady) that when you come back, you’ll be slapped in handcuffs.’
Gee...what a nice image.
What about the Pig Kennedy and Dimwit Prez Carter meeting with the USSR ambassador in order to undermine Ronaldus Magnus?
What about Dickhe@d Durbin et al meeting with Saddam Hussein, and publicly rebuking President Bush?
The latest rat efforts ala’ Pelosi Galore to undermine a Republican President is just the latest in a long line of Democrat outrages. I hope the GOP and Justice Dept nail her up against a wall, but the chances are worse than winning big at your state lottery.
Plowing onward paying no attention to reality is cruising down the freeway with your eyes closed!
This president will never invoke the Logan Act against any Democrat no matter what the Democrat does, including making deals to arm our enemies with real weapons. He calls it compassion. I believe it is the Inferiority Syndrome that grips Republicans in power. They stay uneasy because they think that it upsets the balance of nature when Republicans rule. They feel in their bones that Democrats are the rightful rulers of America and Republicans in power are just holding the spots for a proper Democrat return and meantime raking off as many expensive goodies as they can until the proper owners of power return.
I get tired of the comparisons to poor Neville Chamberlain. It only took him one year to wake up-- between the Munich agreement and Hitler's invasion of Poland. True, he wasn't much of a leader, but at least he eventually smelled the coffee and had the decency to give way to Churchill.
There's a reason for that.
I want to claim my portion as a deduct on my tax return this year.
Taxation with misrepresentation.
I want to claim my portion as a deduct on my tax return this year.
Taxation with misrepresentation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.