Posted on 02/01/2007 8:40:57 AM PST by TitansAFC
Ann Coulter analyzes GOP Presidential hopefuls:
---Rudy Giuliani:
"I Think He's The Only Republican Who Can't Beat Hillary."
"I don't see him winning the Primary."
"If you can't get MY vote as a Republican against Hillary....."
---John McCain:
"Not a Conservative, but a patriot."
"A genuine war hero, unlike John Kerry."
"His weaknesses are half of his positions."
---Mitt Romney:
"Red stater in a blue state."
"Has a working knowledge of God."
---Newt Gingrich:
"Absolutely brilliant."
"His closet has certainly been thoroughly investigated already."
"I wish we could bring him in to pinch-hit for all presidential debates."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
The Dems did that in '04, and look how well that worked for them!
I fairness and no grudges. I thought you would be interested.
I agree. That sort of mentality is foolish, and I do not advocate it.
Tell me which state that went Bush in 2000 and 2004 would go Hillary if Rudy was the nominee, but would be RED if Rudy wasnt the nominee.......OH might go DEM but will do so anyway...
For all the Rudy backers:
Here's your chance to explain why conservatives should vote for Rudy. And please don't say 'because we don't want Hillary.' That's how Republicans lost the last election by claiming 'vote for me' because you want to vote against the Democrats.
I saw this last night; I'm not one who puts anything into what others say.
But thanks.
Guess they'd rather be dead than alive.
The derangment syndrome is alive and well all over this country.
"'One pundit recently said: Which state is Hillary going to lose that Kerry won?""
Depends who the nominee is....if it is Tancredo I can see AZ, VA, CO, etc etc going DEM
I'm probably a little long in the tooth to be your "son", and I'm definitely too long in the tooth to start a career in politics, which is what it takes to get to the top. Further, I would tell people the truth, and that isn't something that wins elections.
If you are happy with the slate of candidates, good for you.
I cannot see Pennsylvania or Michigan going for Guliani on your list. There is too much fraud. Throw in that in the next election the Ds are in a better position to steal Florida and Ohio, and thinks look worrisome for whichever candidate wins the primary.
I think Hillary would win Arkansas, Missouri and possibly Montana, Colorado and Florida against Rudy. Montana and Florida are certainly wacko predictions that violate the CW, but I have my suspicions.
Ann's opinion is just that. Her opinion....which is flawed IMO
If the nominee is Tancredo, Hillary wins every state except Idaho and Utah. Hey, I've got a great idea, let's nominate the worst candidate we possibly can!
Missouri, Florida, Arizona, Nevada, Virginia, Ohio and North Carolina are all in play the moment we nominate a liberal. The only state on your list I see as even a remote possibility is Jersey.
The notion that if we only nominate the most liberal candidate in the party's history we'll be able to pick off blue states is probably the most short-sighted, foolish bit of strategery I've ever heard. Democrats will vote Democratic, no matter how much we try to appease them with our nominee.
we are in a celebrity culture. Until or unless Duncan Hunter somehow turns himself into a celebrity, he's NOT going to get mentioned, and because he doesn't get mentioned, he won't poll at all.
A second reality is anyone who isn't being mentioned in the polls absolutely will not win a primary.
Now, people here keep jumping all over me because I point out this reality, like gravity. Ignoring it doesn't change it. When you have large segments of the U.S. public who can't even name the VICE PRESIDENT, they sure aren't going to be "excited" about a congressman they've never heard of.
Both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush understood this by starting two years out lining up governors, making the rounds and making a national name. Both Rudy and McLame have done this for three years, McClame by dissing Bush and getting fawning media treatment, and Rudy by playing on his 9/11 actions.
I'll vote for Hunter over Newt, Newt over Rudy.
But in the end, you better be prepared for Rudy or McLame to be the nominee. (Cue all the people who say, "I won't vote then." Then cue the Hillary inauguration music).
Oh, no; he's one of those guys?
OK, I asked those who support Rudy to explain why we should vote for Rudy. Not just vote against Hillary or other Dem.
No one has a response. Real inspiring.
Can you link any info on that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.