Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/24/2007 5:51:25 AM PST by NapkinUser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: NapkinUser

More yellow journalism from WND.


2 posted on 01/24/2007 5:53:23 AM PST by Lunatic Fringe (LF for President! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1771780/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser

Although I agree with the wife, I don't think it's a very smart strategy to insult the President publicly while he's considering the idea of pardoning her husband.


3 posted on 01/24/2007 5:54:08 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser

Something is terribly wrong. And why isn't the MSM all over this? Greta? Geraldo?..........no rich dead white girls........


5 posted on 01/24/2007 5:55:46 AM PST by Red Badger (Rachel Carson is responsible for more deaths than Adolf Hitler...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser
IMO it is hard excusing shooting a fleeing suspect in the back. I dont however see any reason to give a drug runner a free pass to testify, especially when the Mexicans wont do the same for us.
6 posted on 01/24/2007 5:56:12 AM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser
I would like to know more about the Clinton-Zedillo relationship
9 posted on 01/24/2007 5:57:31 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser

and was sharply critical of President Bush, calling him a hypocrite and worse.



Yep..... that's the course to take......

When you need help you don't spit in the face of those that may can help. Rohrabacher is no different.


15 posted on 01/24/2007 6:01:30 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser
"How could President Bush say that he wanted to secure our borders and that he would double the size of the Border Patrol when my husband is in prison," she asked WND.

Because, Mrs Ramos, the two have nothing to do with each other. I know you're upset that your husband is in prison, but get a clue. You only come off sounding looney with these kinds of comments.

24 posted on 01/24/2007 6:13:18 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser
Whatever happened to the old "STOP, or we'll shoot." police command?

Political correctness will be the downfall of this country.

32 posted on 01/24/2007 6:31:06 AM PST by vox humana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser

The drug smuggler was armed with pounds of an illegal substance to sell to our kids and put us in jeopardy at the hands of druggies and criminals. This scum should have been ignored, instead he was given immunity. I believe he was shot in the butt, not the back. The big issue was that they tried to cover it up. It has to be a difficult job to work for a government who doesn't really want you to do your job at enforcing our borders.

The Border agents were wrong to try to cover it up. This sentence is as much as people get for murder. Maybe a more equitable justice should be worked out. Instead the US is still pandering to Mexico.


39 posted on 01/24/2007 6:39:44 AM PST by dforest (Liberals love crisis, create crisis and then dwell on them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser

Talk about taking two Patriots and turning your back on them...When they do get out, I will not be surprised to see two very different attitudes towards the people and entities that were supposed to protect them. Actually, I don't blame them if they do come out swinging.


50 posted on 01/24/2007 7:12:07 AM PST by devane617 (It's McCain and a Rat -- Now what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser; xzins; blue-duncan
I have lost a lot of respect for Bush and his administration over this prosecution. In the last two years Bush has shown almost no leadership qualities. The quality of a leader is in his ability to garner followers. At 22% approval rating it is clear that Bush does not have what it takes to lead. He may be governing ok, but he is not leading anyone.

By allowing this travesty of justice to occur he has lost his base. It is a shame because I had high hopes for this presidency. Bush may be a decent man, but at this point he is wholly ineffective as a leader. If he does not begin to effectively lead this country, then the odds of a Republican being elected in 2008 are nill.

63 posted on 01/24/2007 7:43:39 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onedoug

ping


72 posted on 01/24/2007 7:57:54 AM PST by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser
Asked what message he wanted to send by inviting Ramos' wife to attend the speech in person, Rohrabacher explained: "I wanted to give Mrs. Ramos the opportunity to be in the room and look President Bush right in the face, knowing that this was the man who was destroying her life by his decision to prosecute her husband to the hilt."

Rohrabacher described the injustice he perceived in emotional terms: "By prosecuting these two Border Patrol agents while the drug smuggler is given immunity, President Bush has brutalized the lives of agents Ramos and Compean with a decision that threatens to destroy their families."


Silly me. I thought some guy named Sutton was the prosecutor.

Hyperbole rarely helps one's case.
89 posted on 01/24/2007 8:25:04 AM PST by Xenalyte (Anything is possible when you don't understand how anything happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser
"President Bush can say all he wants that the solution to border security is new infrastructure and technology," Ramos told WND, "but as long as my husband is in jail the American people should know that President Bush doesn't mean a word he says."

The President didn't force her husband to shoot anyone, and if a jury convicted him, it possibly was on the strength of the EVIDENCE, again, nothing to do with the President.

102 posted on 01/24/2007 8:36:29 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser
Ignacio Ramos

Probably one of those Stormfront-type racists who just hates Mexicans because they're Hispanic.

< / sarc >

130 posted on 01/24/2007 10:28:35 AM PST by Sloth (The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser
The more I here on this case the more I think they shouldn't get a pardon !

They are GUILTY !

148 posted on 01/24/2007 10:39:48 AM PST by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser

"Rohrabacher agreed with Ramos, emphasizing to WND that "the Bush administration has a hidden agenda with Mexico and that agenda is to keep our border with Mexico wide open, even to drug smugglers."

and terrorists. Pretty much sums it up.


153 posted on 01/24/2007 10:45:45 AM PST by Kimberly GG (DUNCAN HUNTER '08.....lframerica.com.....MARCH TO TAKE BACK AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser

Bump for later reading


221 posted on 01/24/2007 11:54:38 AM PST by Kevmo (Darn, if only I had signed up 4 days earlier, I'd have a 3-digit Freeper #)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser

Both Sides of this Issue have Right and Wrong in them, IMHO. At the End of the Day, I Trust my President to Do the Right Thing.


259 posted on 01/24/2007 12:22:49 PM PST by Kitty Mittens (To God Be All Excellent Praise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NapkinUser

I must admit that I have not followed the details of this case but, I know of no jurisdiction in the US that allows a suspected felon to be shot in the back.


434 posted on 01/25/2007 7:53:21 AM PST by lawdude (2006: The elections we will live to die for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson