Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Con job at The Weather Channel
WorldNetDaily ^ | 1-5-07 | Melanie Morgan

Posted on 01/05/2007 6:16:37 AM PST by Ouderkirk

Con job at The Weather Channel

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: January 5, 2007 1:00 a.m. Eastern

This week Americans observed a national day of mourning (I'm speaking not of President Ford's funeral, but rather the day that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi seized power in Congress). Far-left political ideologies are being promulgated through ever-increasing mediums, and recently I noticed that a once-vaunted American television network, The Weather Channel, had succumbed to the cancerous spread of liberalism.

The Weather Channel debuted in 1982 and went on to earn a reputation as a well-known and respected cable network. The explosive success of the cable channel prompted the publication of a book marking the network's 20th anniversary. That success has been based on the fact that weather forecasts are sought after by a vast number of Americans on a near-daily basis.

What had been nice about The Weather Channel is that through most of its history it stayed clear of political propaganda and focused on delivering weather forecasts to the nation, supplemented with riveting live reports from the front lines of hurricanes, winter blizzards and springtime floods.

But no more. The Weather Channel is now engaged in a con job on the American people, attempting to scare the public that their actions are destroying the planet by creating a global warming crisis.

The move away from scientific forecasting of the weather to sensationalized leftist political advocacy is in part due to the influence of Wonya Lucas, executive vice president and general manager of The Weather Channel Networks.

Lucas admitted in a recent interview with Media Village that the reprogramming of The Weather Channel was influenced by her tenure at CNN when that network shifted from presenting straight news to personality-driven programming.

Lucas decided that what was good for CNN was good for The Weather Channel, and the objectivity and respectability of the network has now been thrown out the window. It doesn't matter that CNN's turn to the left has caused their ratings to plummet; The Weather Channel's embraced its model.

Media Village reported that the move by The Weather Channel "is intended to establish a broader perspective on the weather category and, says Lucas, to move the brand from functional to emotional."

Emotional weather forecasting?

The Weather Channel is launching a new website and broadband channel dedicated solely to global warming called "One Degree" and has a weekly program called "The Climate Code," devoted almost entirely to liberal advocacy on climate matters.

The network is running advertisements showcasing scared and confused Americans, including children and senior citizens, wondering about the coming apocalypse caused by global warming. (You can view the ad for yourself here.)

The chief martyr for the new "emotional" approach to broadcasting at The Weather Channel is Dr. Heidi Cullen, who serves as the network's cheerleader for global warming hysteria. Cullen's supposed expertise on climatology includes, among other things, earning a bachelor's degree in Near Eastern religions and history from Juniata College. One must indeed have to believe in the mystical to accept anything Ms. Cullen has to say about climatology.

Writing for the One Degree blog, Ms. Cullen recently threw a hissy fit that some meteorologists are openly questioning the conclusions drawn by the Greenpeace crowd about the nature, extent, causes and even existence of global warming.

Cullen's diatribe, titled "Junk Controversy Not Junk Science," called on the American Meteorological Society to start requiring all meteorologists to tow the line on liberal interpretation of global warming, or else lose the organization's certification.

George Orwell's 1984 couldn't have concocted a better form of thought control.

The global warming crowd, led by arrogant hustlers such as Heidi Cullen at The Weather Channel, has set up a no-lose situation for themselves.

Climatology is by definition the study of long-term climate trends, and it will indeed be many decades or longer before any definitive conclusions about even the existence of global warming – let alone its causes – can be determined to be true or false. This means that Cullen and her cohorts can't be held accountable for their erroneous beliefs.

Even still, we can see how foolish it is to allow people like Heidi Cullen to influence decision-makers to impose further restrictions and regulations on the actions of human beings. Global warming scaremongers jumped on the devastation of Hurricane Katrina and the busy 2005 Atlantic hurricane season and went on to predict that 2006 would be a potentially devastating year of tropical cyclones in the Atlantic Ocean.

As it was, not one single hurricane made landfall in the U.S.

If forecasters can't reliably tell us what will happen in two to three months from now, why would anyone trust that they know what will happen with the weather in 50 or 100 years from now and let them tell us how to live our lives accordingly?

This is all about Big Brother do-gooders trying to control how you live your life, and stripping away the freedoms and liberties of people to live their lives as they see fit, engage in commerce and raise their families.

There's a con job going on at The Weather Channel, and it's time that viewers let the network know it's time to stop the liberal politicization of weather reporting.

You can contact The Weather Channel's vice president of public relations, Kathy Lane, at klane@weather.com to let her know what you think about the new direction of The Weather Channel and voice your opinion.


TOPICS: Unclassified
KEYWORDS: algore; climatechange; climatecode; cnn; globalwarming; heidicullen; junkscience; melaniemorgan; twc; weather; weatherchannel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-192 next last
Looks like the Weather Channel is going to follow CNN into oblivion.

What a solid business model.

1 posted on 01/05/2007 6:16:39 AM PST by Ouderkirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Both networks were founded by that liberal lunatic Ted Turner.

That about says it all.......


2 posted on 01/05/2007 6:18:46 AM PST by Clifford The Big Red Dog (Woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

"Emotion-based" anything is never going to be rational.

This is the entire engine behind liberalism. It is also the only method hucksters need employ to get people to part with their money.

Should that surprise anyone here?


3 posted on 01/05/2007 6:19:41 AM PST by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Really, why anyone with a computer would watch The Weather Channel?

http://www.intellicast.com/IcastPage/LoadPage.aspx


4 posted on 01/05/2007 6:21:09 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

lol. Yep... it's the "my body, my weather" form of programming. "I feel it is bad weather today. I feel that tomorrow will be another day". "I feel for those suffering in Colorado with XX amounts of snow; I feel they must be feeling the deleterious effects of Global Snowing, in that they are bearing the brunt of Global Warming; it's not fair! I feel that we should all be demanding SOCIAL JUSTICE!"


5 posted on 01/05/2007 6:21:22 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Heidi Cullen is a total "global-warming is all our fault and we're doomed" leftwing moonbat.


6 posted on 01/05/2007 6:22:31 AM PST by RockinRight (To compare Congress to drunken sailors is an insult to drunken sailors. - Ronald W. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

I noticed their global warming reports a few months ago.


7 posted on 01/05/2007 6:23:02 AM PST by nuconvert ([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business] (...but his head is so tiny...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

--go to the NOAA website--that's where all the weather info comes from anyway--


8 posted on 01/05/2007 6:23:04 AM PST by rellimpank (-don't believe anything the MSM states about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
If forecasters can't reliably tell us what will happen in two to three months from now, why would anyone trust that they know what will happen with the weather in 50 or 100 years

Hell, I don't trust their 7-day.
First their "It Could Happen" BS series, and now that Global Warming chick.
Yeeech.

9 posted on 01/05/2007 6:26:50 AM PST by grobdriver (Let the embeds check the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
"Emotion-based" anything is never going to be rational.

It's the same as the wind-chill temperatures we now hear. It's "X" degrees outside with a wind speed of "Y" that means it feels like "Z". Some people just use the wind-chill number as the actual temperature, drives me nuts.

10 posted on 01/05/2007 6:29:27 AM PST by stevio (God, Guns, and Guts made America. A politician against any of the 3 doesn't get my vote. (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Cullen's diatribe, titled "Junk Controversy Not Junk Science," called on the American Meteorological Society to start requiring all meteorologists to tow the line on liberal interpretation of global warming, or else lose the organization's certification.

Unbelievable.

The beauty of the weather channel was tune in get the weather and not get a political lecture.

11 posted on 01/05/2007 6:30:14 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

There's always Weather Underground on the web.


12 posted on 01/05/2007 6:31:35 AM PST by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Really, why anyone with a computer would watch The Weather Channel?

The babes.

13 posted on 01/05/2007 6:31:51 AM PST by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

We no longer watch the weather channel due to the PC they tout. We do use their on line services as they have better local radar and their hourly forecast is handy.


14 posted on 01/05/2007 6:32:05 AM PST by SLB (Wyoming's Alan Simpson on the Washington press - "all you get is controversy, crap and confusion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

I think it was TWC that had a warning about planes causing Global warming last night. As my husband said, they're taking advantage of the warm weather in the east to scare-monger.


15 posted on 01/05/2007 6:32:39 AM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alia

I feel your pain. Let's form a support group to empower all the diverse cultures who are feeling the intolerance of the weather. If we could learn to promote activism amongst the weather victims, we could enlighten the masses about the dangers of snow and gassy cows. There can be no social justice until we, the global community, are all equally walking, freezing, and starving. Viva Che Viva the Revolution!

Did I get them all?


16 posted on 01/05/2007 6:34:23 AM PST by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

bump for bookmarking at home...


17 posted on 01/05/2007 6:35:08 AM PST by Andonius_99 (There are two sides to every issue. One is right, the other is wrong; but the middle is always evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

I use NOAA and the Weather Underground Marine Buoy Data.

Occasionaly I will slide through the weather channel on tv. Not anymore.


18 posted on 01/05/2007 6:35:37 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

I'm old enough to remember when the Weather Channel was actually about the weather. But then I'm also old enough to remember when MTV played music videos.


19 posted on 01/05/2007 6:36:11 AM PST by AZLiberty (Tag to let -- 50 cents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alia
Cullen's degree in Near Eastern Religions should allow her to open up a new segment on The Weather Channel:

The Karma Forecast.........Bad Karma for most of the Mid-Atlantic States with ever increasing Good Karma for the Southeast...........

20 posted on 01/05/2007 6:38:48 AM PST by Red Badger (New! HeadOn Hemorrhoid Medication for Liberals!.........Apply directly to forehead.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson