Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perhaps the Democrats are having a change of heart?
Jim Robinson

Posted on 10/04/2006 3:53:06 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

Sounds like the Democrats want to get serious about protecting youngsters from homosexual predators. Hoorah! It's a little late but could be a good. idea!

Maybe we should start by removing homosexuals from all positions where they would have access to young people. Removing them from congress would be a good start, but we need to follow through by removing them from organizations such as the Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, military, churches, universities and schools.

And from our state governments. For example, I think about one third of our local California reps would be gone if this trend catches on. If we want to protect young people from homosexual predators, I think it would be a good idea to keep them from dominating our legislative bodies.

By the way, they should also stop forcing the "normalization" of perverted homosexual lifestyles on our children and our society in general. If children are brought up thinking homosexual perversions are perfectly normal and welcome activities, doesn't this expose them to the danger of being susceptible to advances by homosexual predators? How about teaching them to suspect and avoid the advances of over friendly teachers, ministers, counselors, congressmen and other homos in positions of trust? Makes sense to me.

Yup. Run 'em out of congress on a rail! Go Democrats!! Good start!!


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: democrats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 last
To: sport; Jim Robinson
A Democrat does not have a heart to change.

Change of tactics then. I wonder, what are the poll numbers when it comes to family matters? I'd be willing to bet that the GOP holds a significant edge. Maybe the Dems see this as a way to make inroads on that?
121 posted on 10/04/2006 7:52:07 PM PDT by MikefromOhio ("...America has confronted evil before, and we have defeated it...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio
No, I think they just stepped in it (so to speak). Look for the Dems to start squiggling out now that their pervert is outed as a queer and his alleged victim is of age to marry him should they get serious about it and take up residence in Taxachewsits. Just two consenting adult males trading love notes and spit, etc.
122 posted on 10/04/2006 7:59:07 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I don't konw, I wouldn't overestimate the intelligence of the people running the campaigns for most Dems.

While they will probably run this thing as long as they think it'll help them, which means they will run it until long after it has any effect.


123 posted on 10/04/2006 8:04:01 PM PDT by MikefromOhio ("...America has confronted evil before, and we have defeated it...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Yea Jim, start a witchhunt! Since our borders are secure, there is world peace and our budget is balanced, Congress should make purging gays in every level its first priority! Nothing like big government directed the right way!


124 posted on 10/04/2006 8:58:10 PM PDT by youthgonewild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: youthgonewild

But, but, but.... "It's all about protecting the chilluns." Pay attention.


125 posted on 10/04/2006 9:00:59 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

BOOM!

That's why JimRob is The Man around here...I hope that n00b troll got to see what got him.


126 posted on 10/04/2006 9:09:38 PM PDT by JRios1968 (Tagline wanted...inquire within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Well, I am guessing/hoping you are being sarcastic.

My best friend is gay, and a freeper, and had it not been for him I would not have found this site years ago and posted so much here (not under this name, left and came back of own accord, was also a site donor for years here).

I don't see one's sexuality as the problem, pedophiles and sex freaks come from both sides of the fence.

Am I against gay agendas, the left, etc? Damn right I am. But I don't see being gay as the main factor in this case or others. I see personal responsibility as the main factor - and in this case foley messed up in that arena.

The dems are hypocrites in this arena to be sure, they only care about screwups when it is our party doing such. Shame on them.

But you broadbrush a whole group of people, some of which DO support the right and conservatives, and the belief that people should be free to live their lives the way they see fit.

I remember you were not real fond of Bush back in the day, nor were some others here. Back then we were more focused on better government and leaders, and just as hard on conservatives as we were liberals. We had standards, and those that failed such standards were treated the same.

Dems blow to be sure, but attacking all gays in your post does not seem to help our cause or our side. Maybe I am missing the sarcasm, shame on me if that is the case.

I hope we can stick to attacking the main problem - liberals. And gay does not equal liberal from what I have seen and known in life. But I can see more and more gays moving away from our party with such posts as this. Which is a shame because the gays I know want the same things we do - less government, less crap in education, and more people to be able to choose freely how to live their lives.

---I may get banned for this, who knows. If so - I am signing of then as who I once was, Chance33_98.


127 posted on 10/04/2006 11:27:05 PM PDT by ChessMan (It's not just a tagline, it's an adventure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Bump;)


128 posted on 10/05/2006 7:53:09 AM PDT by bwteim (bwteim = Begin With The End In Mind --- Support the Cause: Donate Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Hmmmmm. Run it up the flagpole at the DNC and see if it flies. ;)

But seriously Jim, only Republican homosexuals are a menace to society, don't you get it?

129 posted on 10/05/2006 8:02:34 AM PDT by veronica (NEW LITERARY AND ARTS JOURNAL offers free advertising for writers, bloggers, artists. FRmail me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; wagglebee; scripter; EdReform; little jeremiah
Mega Bump!

Ping!
130 posted on 10/05/2006 8:06:14 AM PDT by Antoninus (Attention GOP---Rule 4: See Rules 1 and 3. Rule 5: NO FOLEYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82
hmmm....DU is watching us:

***************

DU is always watching us. What else is happening in their pathetic lives? :)

131 posted on 10/05/2006 8:19:42 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: veronica
It sure isn't flying there on the thread where they are discussing this;) They have yet to understand satire, hypocrisy, or irony.
132 posted on 10/05/2006 8:33:47 AM PDT by bwteim (bwteim = Begin With The End In Mind --- Support the Cause: Donate Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

As far as BSA goes, we've been trying for years but it is a near impossile task. Each Troop pays an annual fee that is largely for defending lawsuits precipitated by the sexual predators.

They view scout troops like holding pens.....sheep fat and ready for slaughter. When outed or put under scrutiny they move some where else and find a new troop on which to prey.

they operate with no fear because they are pretty much immune.


133 posted on 10/05/2006 8:41:33 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. Foley is why we don't allow queers to be Scoutmasters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bwteim
It sure isn't flying there on the thread where they are discussing this;) They have yet to understand satire, hypocrisy, or irony.

Same with some other internut clowns. Went right over, or perhaps through, their air-filled heads. ;)

134 posted on 10/05/2006 9:07:09 AM PDT by veronica (NEW LITERARY AND ARTS JOURNAL offers free advertising for writers, bloggers, artists. FRmail me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I was just thinking that when I came across your item. The Dems know that MOST folks are pi**** at having homosexuality shoved in their faces. They want to play both sides of the fence.....somehow.

It's like Hillary"s...Kill the babies....but not too many.

135 posted on 10/05/2006 9:10:50 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

You hit the nail squarely on the head Mike.The Democrats will say anything that they think that the people want to hear in order to get elected.


136 posted on 10/05/2006 6:31:13 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Drudge revealed that the IM exchanges were between Foley and an 18 year old, Jordan something. So it is a sex scandle between a minor without actual sex and no minor was involved.


137 posted on 10/05/2006 7:45:04 PM PDT by YdontUleaveLibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I'd forward this to Denny Hastert. Let him know there are a whole bunch of us that support him, and maybe that will give him a boost in demanding full disclosure and investigations on both sides of the aisle. The Democrats want an investigation, lets give them one. Leave no stone unturned.


138 posted on 10/06/2006 2:29:09 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Karl Rove you magnificent bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessMan
Somewhere along the line a "threshold of morality" has to be developed. For years I have spoken with people that carry your point of view of "... people should be free to live their lives the way they see fit." Where does it stop Chessman?
Is it ok to accept the homosexual lifestyle?
Well, why stop there then?
There are people out there that want young children. They want to have sexual relations with them. (In this argument I try to make it a little more personal with people by referring to one of their relatives by name.)
Is it OK that one of these persons who is "sexually oriented" for children is allowed to pursue his/her desires with no consequences? After all it is their "sexual orientation" that is driving their need. Is that behavior allowable?

If it isn't then what gives you the right to say it isn't allowable? What gives you or anyone else the right to tell that individual he/she cannot have sexual relations with children?
Maybe I am confused by definitions these days but I believe to be "conservative" you used to have the Judeo-Christian ethics to base your conservatism on. Those ethics include ZERO tolerance for homosexuality / beastiality etc etc.
Our society has so lost its moral foundation because we can no longer call evil "evil" because we are no longer allowed to use the book that was the foundational writings of what made the USA great! We need to acknowledge that we are accountable to our Creator. We need to look to His writings so we know how to govern. When we ignore His laws we are destined to a life of disorder and decadence.
139 posted on 10/06/2006 3:14:50 AM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson