Posted on 10/04/2006 3:53:06 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Sounds like the Democrats want to get serious about protecting youngsters from homosexual predators. Hoorah! It's a little late but could be a good. idea!
Maybe we should start by removing homosexuals from all positions where they would have access to young people. Removing them from congress would be a good start, but we need to follow through by removing them from organizations such as the Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, military, churches, universities and schools.
And from our state governments. For example, I think about one third of our local California reps would be gone if this trend catches on. If we want to protect young people from homosexual predators, I think it would be a good idea to keep them from dominating our legislative bodies.
By the way, they should also stop forcing the "normalization" of perverted homosexual lifestyles on our children and our society in general. If children are brought up thinking homosexual perversions are perfectly normal and welcome activities, doesn't this expose them to the danger of being susceptible to advances by homosexual predators? How about teaching them to suspect and avoid the advances of over friendly teachers, ministers, counselors, congressmen and other homos in positions of trust? Makes sense to me.
Yup. Run 'em out of congress on a rail! Go Democrats!! Good start!!
I don't konw, I wouldn't overestimate the intelligence of the people running the campaigns for most Dems.
While they will probably run this thing as long as they think it'll help them, which means they will run it until long after it has any effect.
Yea Jim, start a witchhunt! Since our borders are secure, there is world peace and our budget is balanced, Congress should make purging gays in every level its first priority! Nothing like big government directed the right way!
But, but, but.... "It's all about protecting the chilluns." Pay attention.
BOOM!
That's why JimRob is The Man around here...I hope that n00b troll got to see what got him.
Well, I am guessing/hoping you are being sarcastic.
My best friend is gay, and a freeper, and had it not been for him I would not have found this site years ago and posted so much here (not under this name, left and came back of own accord, was also a site donor for years here).
I don't see one's sexuality as the problem, pedophiles and sex freaks come from both sides of the fence.
Am I against gay agendas, the left, etc? Damn right I am. But I don't see being gay as the main factor in this case or others. I see personal responsibility as the main factor - and in this case foley messed up in that arena.
The dems are hypocrites in this arena to be sure, they only care about screwups when it is our party doing such. Shame on them.
But you broadbrush a whole group of people, some of which DO support the right and conservatives, and the belief that people should be free to live their lives the way they see fit.
I remember you were not real fond of Bush back in the day, nor were some others here. Back then we were more focused on better government and leaders, and just as hard on conservatives as we were liberals. We had standards, and those that failed such standards were treated the same.
Dems blow to be sure, but attacking all gays in your post does not seem to help our cause or our side. Maybe I am missing the sarcasm, shame on me if that is the case.
I hope we can stick to attacking the main problem - liberals. And gay does not equal liberal from what I have seen and known in life. But I can see more and more gays moving away from our party with such posts as this. Which is a shame because the gays I know want the same things we do - less government, less crap in education, and more people to be able to choose freely how to live their lives.
---I may get banned for this, who knows. If so - I am signing of then as who I once was, Chance33_98.
Bump;)
But seriously Jim, only Republican homosexuals are a menace to society, don't you get it?
***************
DU is always watching us. What else is happening in their pathetic lives? :)
As far as BSA goes, we've been trying for years but it is a near impossile task. Each Troop pays an annual fee that is largely for defending lawsuits precipitated by the sexual predators.
They view scout troops like holding pens.....sheep fat and ready for slaughter. When outed or put under scrutiny they move some where else and find a new troop on which to prey.
they operate with no fear because they are pretty much immune.
Same with some other internut clowns. Went right over, or perhaps through, their air-filled heads. ;)
It's like Hillary"s...Kill the babies....but not too many.
You hit the nail squarely on the head Mike.The Democrats will say anything that they think that the people want to hear in order to get elected.
Drudge revealed that the IM exchanges were between Foley and an 18 year old, Jordan something. So it is a sex scandle between a minor without actual sex and no minor was involved.
I'd forward this to Denny Hastert. Let him know there are a whole bunch of us that support him, and maybe that will give him a boost in demanding full disclosure and investigations on both sides of the aisle. The Democrats want an investigation, lets give them one. Leave no stone unturned.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.