Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Border baby' boom strains S. Texas (70-80% of births mothers are illegal aliens)
Houston Chronicle ^ | 9/24/06 | JAMES PINKERTON

Posted on 09/24/2006 6:36:02 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat

RIO GRANDE CITY — First it was a trickle, now it's a flood.

Rising numbers of undocumented immigrants from Mexico and Central America are streaming into Texas to give birth, straining hospitals and costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, health officials say.

Doctors and health officials say they are overwhelmed by both the new arrivals and those immigrant mothers who already are in the state. Even Houston's feeling the pinch. An estimated 70 percent to 80 percent of the 10,587 births at Ben Taub General Hospital and Lyndon B. Johnson General Hospital last year were to undocumented immigrants, administrators say.

Also feeling the strain is Starr County, an already poor South Texas county that has the region's only taxpayer-supported hospital district.

Immigrants "want a U.S.-born baby" and know that emergency room staffers don't collect any money up front, said Dr. Mario Rodriguez, an obstetrician in Starr County.

"The word is out: Come to Starr County and get delivered for free. Why pay $1,000 in Mexico when you can get it for free?" Rodriguez said.

''When we are separated only by the distance of the river, it's easy to do," Starr County hospital administrator Thalia Muñoz said. "It's gotten worse, and it's because the economy in Mexico is not good and because we provide all these benefits."

Unfortunately, doctors say, Starr County isn't alone.

''Our little snapshot is duplicated in all the municipalities between here and California," said Tony Falcon, a Rio Grande City physician who was appointed to the U.S.-Mexico Border Health Commission in April. ''What you see here is what is happening in Brownsville, McAllen, El Paso and San Diego."

He operates a private family clinic and delivers babies at the Starr County hospital. About a third of his deliveries are what he calls "walk-ins" — mothers in labor showing up at the ER.

''Obviously, it has a huge impact on patient health and the kind of health care that's provided," Falcon said. "You don't get the kind of prenatal care you should get."

'Anchor babies' Immigration-control advocates regard the U.S.-born infants as "anchor babies" because they give their undocumented parents and relatives a way to petition for citizenship. They estimate that 360,000 of these babies are born in the U.S. every year and warn that the numbers are rising.

Once parents have an "anchor baby," they become more difficult to deport, said Jack Martin, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, a lobby organization in Washington, D.C.

''It's a fairly big factor in complicating the removal of illegal aliens," Martin said. "Illegal aliens know that and, to some extent, we think they're being influenced into having children as soon as they get into the U.S. to complicate their removal."

Some lawmakers want to begin denying citizenship to babies born to illegal immigrants.

Birthright citizenship, as it is known, has been in force since the approval of the Constitution's 14th Amendment in 1868. But several bills under consideration in Congress would abolish the longstanding federal policy. Sponsors include U.S. Reps. Ron Paul, R-Lake Jackson, and Nathan Deal, R-Ga.

In a largely symbolic move, the Michigan House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly on Sept. 8 to end birthright citizenship.

Undocumented immigrants say they are being attacked unfairly and think that all children born in the U.S. should have equal rights.

Socorro Gonzalez, an undocumented immigrant who in August gave birth to her fourth child on U.S. soil, said she and her husband aren't trying to take advantage of immigration laws or abuse the health care system.

''We're not here to have a child. We are here to work," she said as she cradled her infant son, Orlando Soto.

Gonzalez, 42, said she moved to South Texas four years ago to join her husband, a cabinet maker. Two of their older children were born at a private midwife's clinic, she said, and two were delivered at taxpayer expense at hospitals in McAllen.

Gonzalez said the benefits of undocumented immigrants' labor in the U.S. more than compensate for the costs of their medical bills.

''I don't see why they should deny a medical service if we're here struggling for this country," she said. ''Because of the help of Mexican workers, whether they want us or not, this country is progressing."

Still, someone has to pay the bills, and not everyone is happy about that.

Uncollected medical bills Starr County Memorial Hospital had $3.6 million in uncollected medical bills in 2005, up from $1.5 million in 2002. The total when fiscal 2006 ends on Sept. 30 is expected to hit $3.9 million, chief financial officer Rafael Olivarez said. Unpaid bills for the past five years will reach nearly $13 million, he said.

To make up for the shortfall, Starr County's hospital district is proposing a 25 percent tax hike.

Already, the U.S. government is pitching in, setting aside $1 billion in Medicaid funds to pay for emergency care received by undocumented migrants over the next four years.

But Olivarez said getting the reimbursements isn't easy. Federal officials ''told us at a meeting they would pay us about 20 cents on the dollar," he said. "But it's better than nothing."

No one knows for sure how many undocumented immigrants there are or what they cost the health care system. Most hospitals don't ask whether patients have papers.

Total cost unknown

''It puts them in the position of being border police," said Amanda Engler, a spokeswoman for the Texas Hospital Association in Austin.

Harris County Hospital District officials say their policy is not to question patients directly about their citizenship.

''We do not explicitly ask if our patients are illegal, but we do ask them for proof of Harris County residency," district spokeswoman Shannon Rasp said. "Often citizenship status becomes clearer when billing issues come up."

Eighty-three percent of the undocumented immigrants receiving in-patient care at the district's hospitals and clinics last year were from Mexico, officials said. Six percent were from El Salvador or Guatemala. And the remaining 11 percent were from such countries as Britain, Canada, Haiti, India, Iran, Iraq, Nigeria and Vietnam.

''Using anecdotal information provided us by our staff, statistics from other public hospital systems and our patient demographics, we believe that approximately 70 to 80 percent of our obstetrics patients are undocumented," Rasp said.

In all, 57,072 patients visited the district's hospitals, clinics and health centers last year, and nearly a fifth were undocumented, Rasp said. The cost of their treatment was $97.3 million, up from $55 million in 2002.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aliens; anchorbabies; biggovernment; buildafencenow; illegalaliens; immigrantlist; welfare; welfarestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Doohickey

US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8:

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

Can't do it retroactive.


61 posted on 09/24/2006 8:50:38 AM PDT by dpa5923 (Small minds talk about people, normal minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Uh Senator Jacob's comments on the 14th amendment had clear meaning, which he should have included in the 14th amendment but did not.

Here we go again with you not reading or understanding what's being posted and being childlessly repetitive about it. What grade are you in, the third? I'll post it one more time and maybe it'll sink in. In 1866 the phrase "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" had clear meaning, there was no need to write anymore. They understood that the phrase involved allegiance to the country.

If you're so convinced you're right then when Congress passes a new law on the issue, and no doubt they will eventually you've got nothing to worry about when it gets to the USSC.

62 posted on 09/24/2006 8:54:27 AM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
In 1866 the phrase "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" had clear meaning, there was no need to write anymore. They understood that the phrase involved allegiance to the country.

Ok you are going into your usual p!ssing match mode, but the first sentence says "born" as in coming out of a womb on US soil. It doesn't get any clearer than that.

Don't get mad at me about Howard Jacob's mistake.

63 posted on 09/24/2006 8:58:09 AM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
Just unreal....are we this stupid?

Obviously.

64 posted on 09/24/2006 9:01:45 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I'm going to do a Dane impression and repeat myself:

If you're so convinced you're right then when Congress passes a new law on the issue, and no doubt they will eventually you've got nothing to worry about when it gets to the USSC.

65 posted on 09/24/2006 9:02:05 AM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

Anything from Dane should come with an automatic BARF alert.


66 posted on 09/24/2006 9:02:46 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
I agree with your welfare analysis. However, you are asuming assimilation will occur as it has in the past. I disagree. Multiculturalism is the current venue which is the direct opposite of assimilation.One example of the culture being imported is that approx. 2/3 of illegals do not graduate from High school.

IMO, this cannot be good for America.

67 posted on 09/24/2006 9:03:55 AM PDT by Tripleplay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

Bump


68 posted on 09/24/2006 9:07:01 AM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Anything from Dane should come with an automatic BARF alert.

It does make one very appreciative of teachers as it obviously requires an enormous amount of patience to teach little kids.

69 posted on 09/24/2006 9:09:25 AM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Rising numbers of undocumented immigrants

No, rising numbers of CRIMINAL ALIENS. If you can't even say the words, get the hell out of journalism.

70 posted on 09/24/2006 9:11:11 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buck61

As I said, I haven't been in the baby formula market for about eleven years. I did chance to check out the prices while I was at the grocery store this morning. I'm not skeptical, just shocked. If I needed any reason not to have more children, the cost of baby supplies is another good one.

Yet another example of goverment creating artificial demand through giveaway programs.


71 posted on 09/24/2006 9:37:43 AM PDT by Doohickey (I am not unappeasable. YOU are just too easily appeased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

Time to put an end once and for all for the so-called "birth-right citizenship"!


72 posted on 09/24/2006 9:41:33 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Immigrants "want a U.S.-born baby" and know that emergency room staffers don't collect any money up front, said Dr. Mario Rodriguez, an obstetrician in Starr County.

The 14th Amendment is very clear. These babies are NOT U.S. Citizens. They do not pass the "jurisdiction" test. Why won't Scalia, Roberts and Thomas address this? Where is Congress on this issue? A simple court ruling clarifying the illegality of "anchor babies" would stop this crisis cold.

73 posted on 09/24/2006 9:50:28 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat; Dane

I usually find myself in oppostion to you and Dane, but you're right. We're teetering into xenophobia on immigration and 'nuke Mecca' threads.


74 posted on 09/24/2006 9:56:03 AM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon; Dane
"The truth is, they care precious little for this country except when it comes to the money."

"As do also a lot of native born Americans living off the welfare dole."

I call BS on that idiotic assertion. It's ridiculous to believe that native born Americans care less for America than foreigners no matter whether welfare is involved. But you keep on insulting Americans in your defense of illegals.
75 posted on 09/24/2006 1:39:31 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead (At worst the Pope's comments might cause a "war of words" but mohammedans prefer a "war over words".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

"Why pay $1,000 in Mexico when you can get it for free?" Rodriguez said.

Scum sucking bottom feeding leacherous a-hole.


76 posted on 09/24/2006 8:43:26 PM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomzz

Uh, not me. Couldn't afford any of my kids(3) They are all grown; One lawyer, one trauma nurse and my son graduated and has a B.A. You will have to exclude this as being un-American. Sorry!


77 posted on 09/24/2006 9:35:01 PM PDT by mingwah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

FENCE!


78 posted on 09/24/2006 9:40:24 PM PDT by RouxStir (US out of the UN and UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
Immigrants "want a U.S.-born baby"

First, they're NOT 'immigrants' - they're illegals. And it's an outrage that the law hasn't been changed. NO, you can't be a citizen by birth! The laws' got to be changed. NOW.

79 posted on 09/24/2006 9:41:00 PM PDT by GOPJ (Muslim outrage would be taken more seriously if Muslims weren't such "double standard" hypocrites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tripleplay

"Can someone explain to me why an advanced culture would import the dregs of the Mexican culture which depends upon fraud, graft, kickbacks and corruption in its society to deliver goods and services to its citizens?"

Isn't it just amazing how you NEVER hear Mexicans complain about the Mexican government? But they sure don't have a problem marching in the streets and complaing about US government...demanding rights and change...
only comedian Carlos Mencia has the backbone to state:
"At least white Europeans have the balls to say that they are here because Europe sucks...you can't get Mexicans to say that..."


80 posted on 09/24/2006 10:11:18 PM PDT by Niteflyr ("People get the leaders they deserve" (hear that Mexico??))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson