Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: ‘If it’s About Christianity vs. Islam, We’ll Lose’
Outside the Beltway ^ | 9/18/06 | James Joyner

Posted on 09/19/2006 1:42:14 AM PDT by LibWhacker

President Bush told a group of radio talk show hosts that the war on terror must be framed in terms of values, not religion.

Coulter found herself in the uncharacteristic position of being upstaged by her introducer, Mike Gallagher. He told the audience he was fresh back from an hour-and-45-minute session which President Bush held in the Oval Office Friday afternoon with him and four other conservative talk show hosts: Atlanta’s Neal Boortz, Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity and Michael Medved. Rush Limbaugh couldn’t make it, he said.

Though he said this session was supposed to be off the record, Gallagher described it at some length, including Bush’s observation to the right-wing radio jocks that the War on Terror has to be about right versus wrong, “because if it’s about Christianity versus Islam, we’ll lose.”

“Remind me never to invite you to an off-the-record session,” Coulter said after his introduction.

Indeed.

Still, if Bush said what Gallagher said he did, he’s right. Islam is, of course, a big piece of the puzzle. But the battle over ideas has to be fought by finding common moral ground, not bashing Islam in general.

It’s no small irony that this was revealed while introducing, Ann “invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity” Coulter.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; bush; christianity; coulter; dishonorable; egobeforecountry; gallagher; gallagheramoron; galleghermotormouth; islam; mikegallagher; rushissmart; values
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281-295 next last
To: ZULU

Any child with the ability to use a computer and google stuff can up with tons of muslim websites in support of those who act against the terror. there's even a muslim commander of a british battle group.

Capitalizing words or using multiple question marks btw are a sure sign of emotional over-envolvement.


121 posted on 09/19/2006 5:19:49 AM PDT by Rummenigge (there's people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

"Christianity is based on a reasonable view of the universe, which came to us through God's revelation to the Jews and the philosophical foundations of the Greeks that are expressed in the New Testament.
Islam is fundamentally irrational and has a concept of a god who is arbitrary and irrational and bound by no interior consistency, and who can be known only through his draconian laws.

Oddly enough, secularism has the same view of an irrational, meaningless universe, which runs on laws somehow mysteriously produced and imposed by matter itself, but which also is fundamentally without a purpose or rational direction."

'Excellent. Well said!' DITTOS


122 posted on 09/19/2006 5:27:02 AM PDT by aumrl (we get what we deserve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
It was Peter who cut off the guard's ear, not Matthew.
123 posted on 09/19/2006 5:27:37 AM PDT by Amanda King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

"If President Bush said that, he's wrong. It is about Islam, a primitive, barbaric religion. And that guy Mo' was a freak, too."

BUMP.


124 posted on 09/19/2006 5:28:05 AM PDT by reelfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: spatso
This battle cannot be won by a military campaign.

Islam is at war with the non-Islamic world. The Islamic war has intensified for decades. It is a war of expansion into non-Islamic territories. At some point Islam will push too hard. At that time we can either respond with a military campaign, or surrender.
125 posted on 09/19/2006 5:29:36 AM PDT by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I think the pres was demonstrating a higher thought process. This is not an esoteric religious debate, this is a bullets and blood debate.


126 posted on 09/19/2006 5:30:15 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets

I think the difference is that defeating Japan was sufficient to defeat Shintoism, because it was a purely nationalist religion. There is no one country we could defeat to defeat Islam.

Well, maybe taking out Mecca would work...but I think that's sort of a last resort!


127 posted on 09/19/2006 5:31:58 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

Islam is about KEEPING people ignorant and barbaric. The "enlightenment" of islam was when a bunch of arab merchant found they could sucker venitians into buy some ancient scrolls.


128 posted on 09/19/2006 5:33:27 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

"The problem is that the Muslims are using bombs and bullets. Not ideas."

Our ideas are better...but so are our bombs and bullets. It's time we started expending a lot of all the above. Islam understands one thing: power. We need to demonstrate power, and the unflinching moral authority to use that power.

We do not look strong with the sort of self-loathing approach we currently take to international conflict.

Were I "King," I'd declare REAL war, and start attacking every terrorist stronghold I could identify in the Muslim world. I'd level every neighborhood I could identify where terrorists were harbored and supported.

Tehran? Level it.

I'd make it so painful to even be near a terrorist that no Muslim would consider it.


129 posted on 09/19/2006 5:34:31 AM PDT by RavenATB (Patton was right...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets
"Islam is at war with the non-Islamic world. The Islamic war has intensified for decades. It is a war of expansion into non-Islamic territories. At some point Islam will push too hard. At that time we can either respond with a military campaign, or surrender."

If you believe that, do you also believe we should immediately use force against Pakistan to control their nukes?
130 posted on 09/19/2006 5:34:37 AM PDT by spatso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: piasa

I would bet real money that the president said "JUST about..."

The Greek Independence in 1821 was not JUST Christianity vs Islam and the Christians did win.


131 posted on 09/19/2006 5:41:00 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Irish Rose
"I would like to know what the president meant by that. It's kind of disheartening. I hope he didn't mean, "If it comes down to Christianity and Islam, Islam will win."

Whatever he meant, this statement will be interpreted a hundred different ways...The media will drive this..not to Bush's advantage.

sw

132 posted on 09/19/2006 5:41:10 AM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
...Rush Limbaugh couldn’t make it...

???

What could be more important than meeting with the President???

133 posted on 09/19/2006 5:45:16 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
while Islam hates all other religions, it particularly hates Christianity and Judaism

I wonder if the people of Thailand and India believe Islam hates Christianity and Judaism more? I think Islam is an equal opportunity hater of all other religions.

If Islam believes it is involved in a holy war, it doesn't matter what the opponents of Islam think the war is about. It is a religious war if one side of the conflict believes it a religious war. Denial of that by enemies of Islam won't change that.

Off topic: The Shinto religion began in the seventh century as did Islam.
134 posted on 09/19/2006 5:48:38 AM PDT by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: livius

Absolutely correct, plus Islam has no head such as an emperor, pope, or other such figure.


135 posted on 09/19/2006 5:51:29 AM PDT by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

.


136 posted on 09/19/2006 5:52:58 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets
If Islam believes it is involved in a holy war, it doesn't matter what the opponents of Islam think the war is about. It is a religious war if one side of the conflict believes it a religious war. Denial of that by enemies of Islam won't change that.

That was exactly my point in my earlier posts. Islamists believe 100% in right versus wrong. Pure Islam teaches them that they are good, and on the side of God. We, the unbelievers, are evil, and stand with the great corrupter, Satan.

Telling fundamentalist Muslims that they need to be good people and give up jihad goes over as well as it would if the Devil himself appeared in your living room and told you that if you were a good person and went on a random killing spree, you'd go straight to heaven.

You'd probably pass.

Jihad is commanded by God. To a Muslim, anyone telling you jihad is wrong must be getting their ideas from a source other than God. Anyone telling you jihad is evil, well...

137 posted on 09/19/2006 5:54:40 AM PDT by Steel Wolf (As Ibn Warraq said, "There are moderate Muslims but there is no moderate Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
...because if it’s about Christianity versus Islam, we’ll lose.”

Perhaps, Mr. Bush. But if it's about Islam versus everyone else (which is really what it is), then we'll eventually win.

138 posted on 09/19/2006 5:58:16 AM PDT by jpl (Victorious warriors win first, then go to war; defeated warriors go to war first, then seek to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irish Rose

The president has stated since the beginning that this war was not with Islam, a religion of peace. How many times has Bush told us this. Time and time again.

I don't care how loudly the public or the base scream about this, but it is true. We are not at war with Islam. Framing the war in that context would be fool hardy at this point. Some here would welcome it being framed that way, but it would only bring the violence to our own shores, nay...to our own cities.

Americans in general are not prepared for it. All the bravado here wouldn't protect us in a guerrilla battle waged in the streets of Detroit, New York, Chicago, La.


139 posted on 09/19/2006 6:01:31 AM PDT by EBH (All great truths begin as blasphemies. GB Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; redgirlinabluestate; DadOfTwoMarines; aimee5291; GatorGirl; maryz; ...

+

If you want on (or off) this Catholic and Pro-Life ping list, let me know!



140 posted on 09/19/2006 6:02:33 AM PDT by narses (St Thomas says “lex injusta non obligat”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281-295 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson