Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Novak: Real story behind Armitage story
Chicago Sun Times ^ | September 13, 2006 | Robert Novak

Posted on 09/13/2006 12:00:39 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy

When Richard Armitage finally acknowledged last week he was my source three years ago in revealing Valerie Plame Wilson as a CIA employee, the former deputy secretary of state’s interviews obscured what he really did. I want to set the record straight based on firsthand knowledge.

First, Armitage did not, as he now indicates, merely pass on something he had heard and that he ‘‘thought’’ might be so. Rather, he identified to me the CIA division where Mrs. Wilson worked, and said flatly that she recommended the mission to Niger by her husband, former Amb. Joseph Wilson.

Second, Armitage did not slip me this information as idle chitchat, as he now suggests. He made clear he considered it especially suited for my column.

An accurate depiction of what Armitage actually said deepens the irony of him being my source. He was a foremost internal skeptic of the administration’s war policy, and I long had opposed military intervention in Iraq. Zealous foes of George W. Bush transformed me improbably into the president’s lapdog. But they cannot fit Armitage into the left-wing fantasy of a well-crafted White House conspiracy to destroy Joe and Valerie Wilson. The news that he and not Karl Rove was the leaker was devastating news for the left.

A peculiar convergence had joined Armitage and me on the same historical path. During his quarter of a century in Washington, I had no contact with Armitage before our fateful interview. I tried to see him in the first 2 years of the Bush administration, but he rebuffed me — summarily and with disdain, I thought.

Then, without explanation, in June 2003, Armitage’s office said the deputy secretary would see me. This was two weeks before Joe Wilson surfaced himself as author of a 2002 report for the CIA debunking Iraqi interest in buying uranium in Africa.

I sat down with Armitage in his State Department office the afternoon of July 8 with tacit rather than explicit ground rules: deep background with nothing said attributed to Armitage or even an anonymous State Department official. Consequently, I refused to identify Armitage as my leaker until his admission was forced by Hubris, a new book by reporters Michael Isikoff and David Corn that absolutely identified him.

Late in my hourlong interview with Armitage. I asked why the CIA had sent Wilson — lacking intelligence experience, nuclear policy or recent contact with Niger — on the African mission. He told the Washington Post last week that his answer was: ‘‘I don’t know, but I think his wife worked out there.’’

Neither of us took notes, and nobody else was present. But I recalled our conversation that week in writing a column, while Armitage reconstructed it months later for federal prosecutors. He had told me unequivocally that Mrs. Wilson worked in the CIA’s Counter-Proliferation Division and that she had suggested her husband’s mission.

As for his current implications that he never expected this to be published, he noted that the story of Mrs. Wilson’s role fit the style of the old Evans-Novak column — implying to me it continued reporting Washington inside information.

Mrs. Wilson’s name appeared in my column July 14, 2003, but it was not until Oct. 1 that I heard about it from Armitage. Washington lobbyist Kenneth Duberstein, Armitage’s close friend and political adviser, called me to say the deputy secretary feared he had ‘‘inadvertently’’ (the word Armitage used in last week’s interviews) disclosed Mrs. Wilson’s identity to me in July and was considering resignation. (Duberstein’s phone call was disclosed in the Isikoff-Corn book, which used Duberstein as a source. They reported Duberstein was responsible for arranging my unexpected interview with Armitage.)

Duberstein told me Armitage wanted to know whether he was my source. I did not reply because I was sure that Armitage knew he was the source. I believed he contacted me Oct. 1 because of news the weekend of Sept. 27-28 that the Justice Department was investigating the leak. I cannot credit Armitage’s current claim that he realized he was the source only when my Oct. 1 column revealed that the official who gave me the information was ‘‘no partisan gunslinger.’’

Armitage’s silence the next 2œ years caused intense pain for his colleagues in government and enabled partisan Democrats in Congress to falsely accuse Rove of being my primary source. When Armitage now says he was mute because of special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s request, that does not explain his silence three months between his claimed first realization that he was the source and Fitzgerald’s appointment on Dec. 30. Armitage’s tardy self-disclosure is tainted because it is deceptive.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: anotherliarexposed; armitage; plame; wilson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-167 next last
To: Bubba_Leroy
Why arnt the Republicans already calling for an investigation into Plame's recommendation that her husbands work for the CIA in Niger?

Isn't this proof that members of the CIA were trying to sabotage President Bush.
61 posted on 09/13/2006 12:52:08 PM PDT by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye
Doesn't it look like it was a set up? At least that's how it appears to me. I guess if Colin Powell is Hillary's running mate we'll know for sure, huh?

I still don't understand what smoked Armitage out.
62 posted on 09/13/2006 12:54:19 PM PDT by pepperdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Some have noted that this lasted report is substantially different than Novak's original account where he said his source made the comment in an "off hand" way.

I think with time Novak realized he'd been played by Armitage and Duberstein , reviewed the conversation (like Libby's testimony about Plame's id --"as if for the very first time"--and revised his account of what had actually happened.


63 posted on 09/13/2006 12:55:10 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
Makes me wonder if Armitage/Powell were promised some plum position in a Kerry administration for their help in setting this up...

Frankly, it wouldn't surprise me in the least.

64 posted on 09/13/2006 12:56:54 PM PDT by Bahbah (Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

Don't mess with the Prince of Darkness.


65 posted on 09/13/2006 12:59:32 PM PDT by Cincinna (HILLARY & HER HINO WANT TO TAKE OVER YOUR COUNTRY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
Your scenario works for me. Thanks. I think it's Washington politics at it's dirtiest.
66 posted on 09/13/2006 1:01:45 PM PDT by pepperdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yeah, you are right. But no Secretary of State has ever done any cleaning, because truthfully, a Secretary of State is just a temp when it comes to State.

The lefties are so entrenched there it would take the Second Coming to get them out.

What is needed is a President with a conservative set, active in the very first year cleaning house. It is never a priority, and as far as I know, no President has ever made it one as such.

Rice has not done anything as far as I know. State is not run by a Secretary anyway, it is a bureau run by career bureaucrats.


67 posted on 09/13/2006 1:02:46 PM PDT by alarm rider (Those that vote for RINOS knowingly, have already admitted defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

marking


68 posted on 09/13/2006 1:03:43 PM PDT by eureka! (Heaven forbid the Rats get control of Congress and/or the Presidency any time soon....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgirlinabluestate

It's funny, when I read the column, my first thought was "Powell or Armitage."

I wish I'd written it at the time.


69 posted on 09/13/2006 1:03:52 PM PDT by furquhart (Time for a New Crusade - Deus lo Volt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pepperdog

Bush has a huge weakness, he shows loyalty to scum, and wayyy too much kindness to his enemies.

Berger got off on a song. State and the CIA are still full of Bush hating Clintonista leakers/liers.

Armatage and Powell should be pubclicly scorned by Bush, and he should issue a pre-emptive pardon for Scooter Libby, since this makes that whole deal a complete joke.


70 posted on 09/13/2006 1:04:08 PM PDT by Idaho Whacko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

Seems to me Armitage was trying to help boost Wilson's credibility after questions were raised about his NYT op-ed attacking Bush. I'll bet Wilson/Plame/Armitage were hoping to get Novak to write that Wilson had credibility because he was "in the loop" with knowledgable officials w/out mentioning true relationship. Otherwise, what the heck would Wilson know about WMD?

But it backfired. How could Armitage be linked to Wilson/Plame? Six degrees:

Wilson/Plame -> WPost reporter/leftist Walter Pincus -> Wife Ann Pincus State Intel Div -> Armitage

W Pincus interviewed Wilson/Plame just before Wilson's op-ed was pblished. A glowingly positive Pincus WP article on Wilson was published on same day as NYT op-ed or within a day or so.


71 posted on 09/13/2006 1:06:17 PM PDT by Gothmog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4

Maybe, but his actions and lack of action were for the benefit of the DNC and their MSM cohorts.

And now if he was a man, which IMHO he isn't, he would do everything to set the record straight and quit trying to protect his fanny!


72 posted on 09/13/2006 1:07:27 PM PDT by landerwy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
What Armitage is confessing to is eerily similar to what Matt Cooper said about his phone calls to Rove and Libby.

We know of the intimate connection between Matt Cooper and Hillary. How "close" is/was Hillary to Armitage??

73 posted on 09/13/2006 1:08:15 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: alarm rider

Just like former CIA Director, Porter Goss, didn't clean house as everybody said he would when he took over from Tenet...........as did Woolsey, Deutch, Turner, et al...


74 posted on 09/13/2006 1:09:01 PM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

I sit waiting with baited breath for the MSM and the demonrats to apologize to the country and the administration for their mistaken beliefs....I'm waiting
I'm waiting I'm waiting I'm waiting


75 posted on 09/13/2006 1:11:58 PM PDT by Marysecretary (Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
Darn right it was a trap. The camera caught Powell with the memo in hand. I'd love to see Hillary's phone calls for the week before and the week after that memo was "noticed". Everything started when Cheney said: "Who the hell is Joe Wilson"?

You have to put the inflections in the proper place to interpret what Cheney meant. I think he meant...Who the hell does Joe Wilson think he is. He hasn't been there in years and knows sh** about nuclear weapons....unless he's sleeping with an "expert".

76 posted on 09/13/2006 1:14:22 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: pepperdog

Corn and Isakoff's book named him. Then he 'fessed up, but with his own twist, which Novak is calling him on.


77 posted on 09/13/2006 1:15:05 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez (Jack Bauer wears Tony Snow pajamas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Well, wish I had gotten in on this story earlier, as I am sure this info will not be seen by those who have already posted, but...from my files:

Been doing a lot of research on this. It was Marc Grossman who initiated this whole thing per the article Libby says Powell, Armitage and Grossman were source for Plame Leak - Insight Mag April 3-9, 2006 Issue

Grossman requested that Carl Ford, Jr. draft the memo, which Ford sent to Grossman on June 10, 2003. Grossman wanted the memo as background to use at a White House meeting on criticism of President Bush for using the Niger claim in his State of the Union speech. On July 6, 2003, Armitage asked Ford to send a copy of the memo to Powell on AF-1. And per the above linked article, it was Grossman that told Libby about Plame and he was also the first one to point a finger at Libby when this broke.

We know Armitage had no loyalty to Bush, but it went even further than that…from a story I found last week:

Kerry Exploring Cabinet Options

An excerpt:

A dark-horse candidate for defense, some said, is Richard L. Armitage, Bush's second in command at the State Department.

Remember...many of the players involved worked for the Kerry campaign. Could Armitage have sold his soul for a potential Cabinet position?

Clarice Feldman gives us another interesting tidbit of info about Grossman:

If Fitzgerald has known since January 12, 2004 of the name of the leaker, why is he still protecting him, and why is he treating the leaker’s (that is, Armitage’s) source, who is almost certainly Marc Grossman, former Under Secretary of State for political affairs, the man reportedly the source for the first accusations against Libby and Rove, as an impartial witness to the events? In the discovery process it turned out that Grossman was a longtime friend of Wilson’s, dating to their college days at the University of California—Santa Barbara. Is it likely that the famous prosecutor missed this fact?

Source

More on Grossman at Strata-sphere. Seems he traveled with some cohorts of John Kerry's...Rand Beers in particular. Grossman went to the same college and graduated the same year as {drum roll please} Joe Wilson and also had the same job in a neighboring country. Strato-sphere also has some interesting comments about a Turkey connection. You remember Turkey…the country that balked at allowing our forces passage into northern Iraq?

And another player in this, Carl Ford, Jr. is no "loyal Republican" either...

As is often the case in these partisan bloodlettings, Bolton's attacker is being presented by the media not only as being a devout public servant - with no axe to grind - but a conservative Republican to boot, a claim that seems to fly in the face of his past political contributions as recorded by the FEC.

$500 to Sen. John Kerry (D-MA), $1,000 to Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-NY), $1,000 to Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) and $500 to Sen. Daniel K. Inouye (D-Hawaii).

The Washington Times offered the following: "Gary Jarmin, a Republican consultant and president of Global Dominion Communications, questioned Mr. Ford's claim of loyalty."Bottom line, is that to the best of my recollection, Carl always considered himself a Democrat," said Mr. Jarmin, a longtime Washington lobbyist. "If he is now a self-described 'loyal Republican,' then he must have had a fairly recent conversion." - Washington Times April 20, 2005

Democrat Ford is a longtime DC lobbyist, something absent from most press accounts of his sink-Bolton campaign. Before he went to the State Department he ran his own lobbying operation - Ford Associates. Currently he is employed as the Executive Vice President of Cassidy & Associates, Washington's most powerful - and liberal - public policy consulting group.

Cassidy & Associates was founded by Gerald Cassidy, former counsel to George McGovern's ultra-lefty Committee on Hunger, he is also a former General Counsel to the DNC - 'nuff said.

Pipeline News

Links to sources at the above link.

Looks to me like a few people need to be prosecuted for an attempted coup against a sitting President.

78 posted on 09/13/2006 1:15:55 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

Did Armitage COMMIT PERJURY??? Why isn't he being PROSECUTED by FITZY??


79 posted on 09/13/2006 1:16:39 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez; Bahbah

See my #78. Armitage's name was floated for a cabinet position for Kerry.


80 posted on 09/13/2006 1:18:12 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson