Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC 9/11 Docudrama's Right-Wing Roots (Free Republic Mentioned)
Yahoo ^ | 9/12/06 | Max Blumenthal

Posted on 09/12/2006 7:08:38 AM PDT by Mr. Brightside

ABC 9/11 Docudrama's Right-Wing Roots

Max Blumenthal

Mon Sep 11, 6:28 PM ET

The Nation -- On Friday, September 8, just forty-eight hours before ABC planned to air its so-called "docudrama," The Path to 9/11, Robert Iger, CEO of ABC's corporate parent, the Walt Disney Company, was presented with incontrovertible evidence outlining the involvement of that film's screenwriter and director in a concerted right-wing effort to blame former President Bill Clinton for allowing the 9/11 attacks to take place. Iger told a source close to ABC that he was "deeply troubled" by the information and claimed he had no previous knowledge of the institutional right-wing ties of The Path to 9/11's creators. He reportedly said that he has commenced an internal investigation to verify the role of the film's creators in deliberately advancing disinformation through ABC.

After stating that she was "looking into" my questions about the production of The Path to 9/11, ABC Vice President of Media Relations Hope Hartman declined to comment on this story.

All week, ABC has withstood withering criticism for The Path to 9/11's imaginative screenwriting that depicts Clinton and members of his administration either ignoring threats from Al Qaeda or botching operations that could have eliminated terror-master Osama bin Laden. Iger conceded in a September 5 press release that key scenes in The Path to 9/11 were indeed fabricated, calling the film "a dramatization, not a documentary." Behind the scenes, Iger reportedly made personal assurances to some of the film's most prominent critics that those scenes would be edited out. But even though some deceptive footage was cut from the original, much of its falsified version of events leading up to 9/11 remains.

Iger now bears ultimate responsibility for authorizing the product of a well-honed propaganda operation--a network of little-known right-wingers working from within Hollywood to counter its supposedly liberal bias. This is the network within the ABC network. Its godfather is far-right activist David Horowitz, who has worked for more than a decade to establish a right-wing presence in Hollywood and to discredit mainstream film and TV production. On this project, a secretive evangelical religious right group long associated with Horowitz, founded by The Path to 9/11's director, David Cunningham, that aims to "transform Hollywood" in line with its messianic vision, has taken the lead.

Before The Path to 9/11 entered the production stage, Disney/ABC signed David Cunningham as the film's director. Cunningham is no ordinary Hollywood journeyman. He is in fact the son of Loren Cunningham, founder of the right-wing evangelical group Youth With A Mission (YWAM). According to Sara Diamond's book Spiritual Warfare, during the 1980's YWAM "sought to gain influence within the Republican party" while assisting authoritarian governments in South Africa and Central America. Cunningham, Diamond noted, was a follower of Christian Reconstructionism, an extreme current of evangelical theology that advocates using stealth political methods to put the United States under the control of Biblical law and jettison the Constitution. Cunningham instilled his radical ideology in young missionaries by sending them to "Discipleship Training School." A former student of Cunningham's school claimed "similarities between cult mind controlling techniques and the [Discipleship Training School] program instituted by YWAM."

When the young Cunningham entered his father's ministry, he helped found an auxiliary group called The Film Institute (TFI). According to its mission statement, TFI is "dedicated to a Godly transformation and revolution TO and THROUGH the Film and Television industry." Cunningham has placed over a dozen interns from Youth With A Mission's Discipleship Training School in film industry jobs "so that they can begin to impact and transform Hollywood from the inside out," according to a YWAM report.

Last June, Cunningham's TFI announced it was producing its first film, mysteriously titled Untitled History Project. "TFI's first project is a doozy," a newsletter to YWAM members read. "Simply being referred to as: The Untitled History Project, it is already being called the television event of the decade and not one second has been put to film yet. Talk about great expectations!" (A web edition of the newsletter was mysteriously deleted last week after its publication by the blogger Digby, but has been cached on Google at the link above).

The following month, on July 28, the New York Post reported that ABC was filming a mini-series "under a shroud of secrecy" about the 9/11 attacks. "At the moment, ABC officials are calling the miniseries 'Untitled Commission Report' and producers refer to it as the 'Untitled History Project,'" the Post noted.

Early on, Cunningham had recruited a young Iranian-American screenwriter named Cyrus Nowrasteh to write the script of his secretive Untitled film. Not only is Nowrasteh an outspoken conservative, he is also a fervent member of the emerging network of right-wing people burrowing into the film industry with ulterior sectarian political and religious agendas, like Cunningham.

Nowrasteh's conservatism was on display when he appeared as a featured speaker at the Liberty Film Festival (LFF), an annual event founded in 2004 to premier and promote conservative-themed films supposedly too "politically incorrect" to gain acceptance at mainstream film festivals. This June, while The Path to 9/11 was being filmed, LFF founders Govindini Murty and Jason Apuzzo--both friends of Nowrasteh-- announced they were "partnering" with Horowitz. Indeed, the 2006 LFF is listed as "A Program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center."

Since the inauguration of Bill Clinton in 1992, Horowitz has labored to create a network of politically active conservatives in Hollywood. His Hollywood nest centers around his Wednesday Morning Club, a weekly meet-and-greet session for Left Coast conservatives that has been graced with speeches by the likes of Newt Gingrich, Victor Davis Hanson and Christopher Hitchens. The group's headquarters are at the offices of Horowitz's Center for the Study of Popular Culture, a "think tank" bankrolled for years with millions by right-wing sugar daddies like billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife. (Scaife financed the Arkansas Project, a $2.3 million dirty tricks operation that included paying sources for negative stories about Bill Clinton that turned out to be false.)

In the immediate wake of the 9/11 attacks, Horowitz led the right's campaign to pin the blame for attacks on Clinton. On February 19, 2002, Horowitz's organization mailed 1,500 lengthy pamphlets to major media outlets which claimed to expose how "the left" in general and Clinton in particular had "undermined America's security," thus causing 9/11. Two years later, Horowitz penned a lengthy manifesto for his FrontPageMag blaming Clinton once again for having "accepted defeat" in the fight against Al Qaeda. Horowitz singled out Clinton's National Security Council Director, Samuel "Sandy" Berger, as especially culpable for allowing the terror threat to fester, casting him as "a veteran of the Sixties 'anti-war' movement" who "abetted the Communist victories in Vietnam and Cambodia."

This year, Horowitz's Hollywood hothouse finally spawned his most potent anti-Clinton propaganda device. With the LFF under Horowitz's control, his political machine began drumming up support for Cunningham and Nowrasteh's Untitled project, which finally was revealed last August as The Path to 9/11.

Like Iger, Horowitz has pleaded ignorance about the sectarian agenda of the film's creators. Responding to an article I wrote for the Huffington Post exposing Horowitz's involvement in The Path to 9/11 (on which this article is adapted), he claimed in a blog post, "In fact, I never heard of David Cunningham or his group before reading about them in Max's hilarious column."

However, Horowitz's public relations blitz on behalf of the film began at least a month ago with an August 16 interview with Nowrasteh on his FrontPageMag webzine In the interview, Nowrasteh described how The Path to 9/11 was filmed "under the very able direction of David L. Cunningham." (Doesn't Horowitz read his own magazine?)

Nowrasteh also foreshadowed the film's assault on Clinton's record on fighting terror. "The 9/11 report details the Clinton's administration's response--or lack of response--to Al Qaida and how this emboldened Bin Laden to keep attacking American interests," Nowrasteh told FrontPageMag's Jamie Glazov. "There simply was no response. Nothing."

A week later, ABC hosted LFF co-founder Murty and several other conservative operatives at an advance screening of The Path to 9/11. (While ABC provided 900 DVDs of the film to conservatives, Clinton Administration officials and reviewers from mainstream outlets were denied them.) Murty returned with a glowing review published by FrontPageMag that emphasized the film's partisan nature. "The Path to 9/11 is one of the best, most intelligent, most pro-American miniseries I've ever seen on TV, and conservatives should support it and promote it as vigorously as possible," Murty wrote. As a result of the special access granted by ABC, Murty's article was the first published review of The Path to 9/11, preceding those by the New York Times and Los Angeles Times by more than a week.

Murty followed her review with a blast e-mail to conservative websites such as Liberty Post and Free Republic on September 1 urging their readers to throw their weight behind ABC's mini-series. "Please do everything you can to spread the word about this excellent miniseries," Murty wrote, "so that The Path to 9/11 gets the highest ratings possible when it airs on September 10 & 11! If this show gets huge ratings, then ABC will be more likely to produce pro-American movies and TV shows in the future!"

Murty's efforts were supported by Appuzo, who handles LFF's heavily-trafficked blog, Libertas. Appuzo was instrumental in marketing The Path to 9/11 to conservatives, writing in a blog post on September 2, "Make no mistake about what this film does, among other things: it places the question of the Clinton Administration's culpability for the 9/11 attacks front and center.... Bravo to Cyrus Nowrasteh and David Cunningham for creating this gritty, stylish and gripping piece of entertainment."

When a group of leading Senate Democrats sent a letter to Iger urging him to cancel The Path to 9/11 because of its glaring factual errors and distortions, Apuzzo launched a retaliatory campaign to paint the Democrats as foes of free speech. "Here at LIBERTAS we urge the public to make noise over this, and to demand that Democrats back down," he wrote on September 7. "What is at stake is nothing short of the 1st Amendment."

At FrontPageMag, Horowitz singled out Nowrasteh as the victim of an unconstitutional crime. "The attacks by former president Bill Clinton, former Clinton Administration officials and Democratic US senators on Cyrus Nowrasteh's ABC mini-series The Path to 9/11 "are easily the gravest and most brazen and damaging governmental attacks on the civil liberties of ordinary Americans since 9/11," Horowitz declared. The next day, Horowitz reposted his 2004 manifesto holding Clinton responsible for 9/11, explaining that, "With tonight's premiere of the ABC-TV movie The Path to 9/11, the truth [sic] impact of the Left's policies in bringing about the nation's worst terrorist attack is finally coming to light."

Although Iger and ABC trimmed as much as thirty minutes of deceptive footage from Sunday's episode of The Path to 9/11, it appeared nonetheless as a mostly faithful adaptation of Horowitz's anti-Clinton essay. Indeed, The Path to 9/11 still contained its most egregiously false scene, in which Sandy Berger refuses to authorize a CIA officer's request to capture bin Laden, who is completely surrounded by rival Northern Alliance soldiers. After the halted (and totally fictional) operation, "Kirk," the (completely imaginary) CIA op played by Donny Wahlberg of New Kids on the Block fame, stands on a hilltop beside the Northern Alliance's quixotic warlord, Ahmed Shah Massoud.

"Are there any men left in Washington?" the script has a frustrated Massoud asking "Kirk." "Or just cowards?"

"Cowards?" The question is quietly being raised in the corridors of ABC-TV's headquarters in Burbank, California. Besieged in his lush office, Iger privately agonizes that he was complacent about an attack on his network's reputation by a band of political terrorists. But when faced with his own version of the Taliban, he appeased them.


TOPICS: Free Republic; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; americahaters; bookburners; bushhaters; censorship; clintonfailures; clintonlegacy; clintonscandals; fifthcolumnists; hatchetjob; liberalhypocrisy; liberalwhining; pathto911; radicalleftists; sept11
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-225 next last
To: Mr. Brightside

I missed all the articles about Fahrenheit 911's Left wing "roots." You can bet King George the Soros had a lot to do with pimping that garbage.


201 posted on 09/12/2006 8:39:11 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (You can't defeat your enemy unless you are willing to get down in the mud with him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

Typical Marxist stuff.

Can't attack the message so attack the messenger.


202 posted on 09/12/2006 8:53:52 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (The Internet is the samizdat of liberty..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik; devolve; potlatch; bitt; Grampa Dave
Describe the situation when your men took down the American forces in Somalia.

After our victory in Afghanistan and the defeat of the oppressors who had killed millions of Muslims, the legend about the invincibility of the superpowers vanished. Our boys no longer viewed America as a superpower. So, when they left Afghanistan, they went to Somalia and prepared themselves carefully for a long war. They had thought that the Americans were like the Russians, so they trained and prepared. They were stunned when they discovered how low was the morale of the American soldier. America had entered with 30,000 soldiers in addition to thousands of soldiers from different countries in the world. ... As I said, our boys were shocked by the low morale of the American soldier and they realized that the American soldier was just a paper tiger. He was unable to endure the strikes that were dealt to his army, so he fled, and America had to stop all its bragging and all that noise it was making in the press after the Gulf War in which it destroyed the infrastructure and the milk and dairy industry that was vital for the infants and the children and the civilians and blew up dams which were necessary for the crops people grew to feed their families. Proud of this destruction, America assumed the titles of world leader and master of the new world order. After a few blows, it forgot all about those titles and rushed out of Somalia in shame and disgrace, dragging the bodies of its soldiers. America stopped calling itself world leader and master of the new world order, and its politicians realized that those titles were too big for them and that they were unworthy of them. I was in Sudan when this happened. I was very happy to learn of that great defeat that America suffered, so was every Muslim. ...


203 posted on 09/12/2006 8:55:37 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Someone that attends FReeps needs to make a poster with one of the twin towers exploding..

Caption is : This is Gorelick's Wall.


204 posted on 09/12/2006 9:01:00 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (The Internet is the samizdat of liberty..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

They're all but calling for a blacklist.


205 posted on 09/12/2006 9:08:55 PM PDT by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laotzu

Ha ha, that's what the lame-o's at the snopes message board used to harass me with whenever I blasted michael moore and his blatant falsehoods.

Oh, so NOW they express outrage over supposed falsehoods, huh? This coming from the same hypocrites that have been accusing Bush since day one that he lied, that he leaked plume's identity, etc. etc.

flaming hypocrites


206 posted on 09/12/2006 9:17:34 PM PDT by World_Events
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside; Landru; bitt; Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; ...

Almost missed this one and it's a lulu!


207 posted on 09/12/2006 9:43:05 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Samwise; kittymyrib

Rush stands by the "one minute cut" statement. He also said the movie was planned for 5 hours when ABC planned to run advertising. They were unable to get advertisers, so ran it without ads. This left them 20 min. short each night. The first night, Nightline's Rat talking points completed the hour, and the president filled the extra time on the second night.


208 posted on 09/12/2006 9:57:47 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
It seems like the writer of this article sees himself as a religious Paul Revere. He's riding through the countryside, yelling that "The Christians are coming! The Christians are coming!"

This man is a bigot and a geopolitical fool. Other than that, nice article.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article: "A Burial at Arlington"

Please see my most recent new statement on running for Congress, here.

209 posted on 09/12/2006 9:59:57 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Have a look-see. Please get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheKidster

What double standard? Since when?

Everybody has a right to free speech except intolerant bigots. Why in fact all ideas have equal merit, all viewpoints should be equally embraced except those that are racist, homophobic, oppressive against the downtrodden, disadvantaged and minorities, hate-mongers and cultural or ethical imperialists, money grubbing capitalists that care nothing about the poor and the sick, those spewing radical right-wing venom against the masses that dare to dissent, desiring only to impose their tyrannical viewpoints upon everybody, the ulitmate goal being that of bringing everybody under totalitarian police state authority.

No double standard at all.


210 posted on 09/12/2006 10:06:22 PM PDT by raygun (Whenever I see U.N. blue helmets I feel like laughing and puking at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

Great post. The truth hurts.


211 posted on 09/12/2006 10:30:01 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: tpaine; Deb

Nah - she was on the Isle that week. ;-)


212 posted on 09/13/2006 4:44:21 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Hezbollah: Habitat for Humanity with an attitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
Yeah, I'll bet this hypocrite wrote several scathing articles about Harry and Linda Bloodworth-Thomason...

NOT.

;-)

213 posted on 09/13/2006 4:46:23 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Hezbollah: Habitat for Humanity with an attitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

The new Hollywood Blacklist: Anyone who isn't a communist.


214 posted on 09/13/2006 6:56:09 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (What did Rather know and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside; All
A week later, ABC hosted LFF co-founder Murty and several other conservative operatives at an advance screening of The Path to 9/11.

Dontcha just love it when they call us "operatives"?!!
LOL!

Murty followed her review with a blast e-mail to conservative websites such as Liberty Post and Free Republic on September 1 urging their readers to throw their weight behind ABC's mini-series..."If this show gets huge ratings, then ABC will be more likely to produce pro-American movies and TV shows in the future!"

Free Republic?!!!
Horrors!
God forbid!
Why would anyone support ABC making pro-American movies?!!
(unless, of course, there is a vast conspiracy of conservative "operatives.")

"Make no mistake about what this film does, among other things: it places the question of the Clinton Administration's culpability for the 9/11 attacks front and center...."

Right where it belongs.

215 posted on 09/13/2006 7:02:58 AM PDT by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake; bert
For years we've sat by & watched the Liberal-Socialists use every arm of the Republic's media to disseminate their bullshit. Hollywierd, alphabet nets, New York Slimes, Associated Quislings, the Compost heaps et al notwithstanding.

The Liberal-Socialists fully understand the awesome *power* the monster they've created has.
Yup, understand the incredible power a hellovalot better than many on the Right apparently have also, given the comments I've read.

The Liberal-Socialists will have none of that crap, will not permit ANY one or thing to use their own mo.
Anyone believing the Liberal-Socialist Left will idly stand by & watch their own shtick used against 'em is in for another think coming, serious deluding themselves.

FGS I'm watching (in complete amazement *&* amusement) as conservatives appear to step-up to "protect" the Liberal-Socialist quisling, Iger.
For crying out loud this clown runs one of the hands-down worst of the Liberal-Socialist nets.
Truly scratching my head over this one, bub.
I mean it's not like the ABC big whig told Georgie S to take a hike & take with 'em all the many other Liberal-Socialist shills ABC employs with him, is it? ;^)

The Liberal-Socialists have used an incredibly extensive *network* of mediot shills to inflict more than enough damage over the years to more than earn the utter contempt of anyone claiming to love & respect our Republic, forget trust.

This piece by Blumenthal's demon offspring's not even *entertaining* in that it's so predictable.
Simply pathetic, I swear.

Don't be fooled by this.
It's nothing more than a tempest in a teapot, & a piss-poor one at that.

In fact given the collective track record of the Republic's alphabet networks when it comes to the "truth"? I half-suspect Iger (& his ABC shills) are behind both sides of the brouhaha surrounding this "issue". And doing so for the same (old) reason all Liberal-Socialists act: themselves & their own selfish self interest(s).

It's real simple FGS, Never believe a liar. Ever.

...starting with ABC.

216 posted on 09/13/2006 7:26:59 AM PDT by Landru (That does it, no sleep number for you pal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

That was not my take on Clarke's role but that he was actually tasked to be Crisis Manager so was performing his function.

You are correct typically Cheney is portrayed as stomping puppies and kittens for fun.


217 posted on 09/13/2006 7:57:36 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
"Besieged in his lush office, Iger privately agonizes that he was complacent about an attack on his network's reputation by a band of political terrorists."

lol...Max apparently doesn't understand the meaning of the word "terrorist". Perhaps someone from the Taliban or Al Quieda could help him?
218 posted on 09/13/2006 11:04:54 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Landru
Some excellent observations my friend. Recognizing what a powerful tool they've laid their hands on, they're not willing to share with anyone who actually cares about the future of America. Socialists, regardless of stripe, have GOT to stick together.

The thing that struck me about this piece(aside from the obvious posturing by this pompous ass): He breathlessly exposes the "right wing" connections to the makers of this film as if he has pulled off some major coup; and documents it of course. I daresay there was very little that couldn't be known or discovered by even the laziest journalist, who are legion as you well know.

And another thing, for all we know, Iger may have encouraged this useful idiot to stir the pot. The only bad press is no press???

Good "seeing" you again.

FGS

219 posted on 09/13/2006 9:16:58 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
"Recognizing what a powerful tool they've laid their hands on..."

What the Liberal-Socialists have created isn't a "tool" my friend, it's a weapon.
The Liberal-Socialists behind every single shenanigan we've ever known or will know now & in the future have the benefit of an incredibly powerful weapon in their arsenal.
And they KNOW it.

The Liberal-Socialists have (for at least the past 20 years since mass media came of age) enjoyed the kind of advantage that's akin to one side having firearms & the other [read: us] nothing but bare hands.
And interestingly enough they still cannot win, not thoroughly win as they dream, at any rate.
At least not yet.

"...they're not willing to share with anyone who actually cares about the future of America."

Hell no they're not willing to share their immense advantage, ESPECIALLY "with anyone who actually cares about the future of America."
Anyone who actually cares about the future of America *is* the "enemy" in the truest sense of the word, we know that much.
Did the USA share their nuclear weapons with Japan & Germany?
Not no, hell no & neither will the Liberal-Socialists share or relinquish their advantage.

"Socialists, regardless of stripe, have GOT to stick together."

They sure do.
And they do this *sticking* business better than any other group I know of, especially our side.
Nuts, isn't it.

"The thing that struck me about this piece (aside from the obvious posturing by this pompous ass): He breathlessly exposes the "right wing" connections to the makers of this film as if he has pulled off some major coup; and documents it of course."

Yea, whadda guy.
Talk about working under *pressure*, deadline-type pressure. :o)
This guy deserves to win the asinine, "Who Wants To Be A Superhero" contest for chrissakes.

"I daresay there was very little that couldn't be known or discovered by even the laziest journalist, who are legion as you well know."

Of course.
That it comes from the offspring of good ol' Sid Vicious has to be the only thing making any sense, whatsoever.

"And another thing..."

Awww man I just LOVE it whenever you get a burr under your saddle!! :o)

"...for all we know, Iger may have encouraged this useful idiot to stir the pot. The only bad press is no press???"

*Precisely*.

Funny how those on this forum -- & any other for that matter, I'd imagine -- will curse the Associated Quislings, alphabet nets et al ad nauseum, then the (isolated) instant "an" article appears they're in agreement with? It -- & by defualt, the author/originator -- is offered as some kind of "proof" to justify their position, lend some kind of *credibility*?
Nuts, just nuts.

Liars are liars & once that fact's known, been proven?
Nothing from that entity should be believed, nothing, and ABC ranks right there at the very top of the heap of crap makers.

Until our side recognizes that little fact we'll ALL be forever subject to having our proverbial chains yanked by the Liberal-Socialist entities in control whenever these miscreants want a good laugh.
I personally find the very thought I'm being *manipulated* a hateful, despicable, untenable position.

"Good "seeing" you again."

Same to you, my friend.
The garden's been taken down, good crops this year. Have cut a couple cords wood & have 'em stacked. Hoses in etc so I'm ready for what I suspect's going to be an early, possibly hard winter up here. That is if the behavior of my feathered friends count for anything & I *think* it does.

Will be in Bayfield Wisconsin for a week just for the hellovit, but my wife knows better. She knows it's a chance to do something quite *special*. Drive the new "Z-Car"!!

Hopefully I'll be seeing more of you in the coming weeks.

... ;^)

220 posted on 09/14/2006 7:09:11 AM PDT by Landru (That does it, no sleep number for you pal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson