Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just watched 'The Path to 9/11'
September 10, 2006 | myself

Posted on 09/10/2006 6:28:09 AM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie

Part one shown on Australian TV this evening.

Don't miss it, my Freeper friends. It's no wonder the Clintonistas have thrown everything at ABC/Disney, in a desperate effort to have the miniseries cancelled. Documents exactly what we've been following over the years on FR. Brave agents on the ground in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Dedicated people at Langley and the J. Edgar Hoover building, working around the clock to capture or kill Bin Laden, Ramzi Yusef et al. And all their efforts derailed by Clinton appointees like Berger and Allbright- selfishly putting their own careers (and covering their asses) before protecting the USA. The line of the show delivered by the actor playing Masood, brave and charismatic leader of the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan:

...are there any men left in Washington? Or are they all cowards?....

Take the phone off the hook, and don't miss it. All the best, Byron


TOPICS: Front Page News; War on Terror; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2001; 911; abc; abcminiseries; arethereanymenleft; aretherenomenleft; berger; binladen; boxcutters; bush; clinton; coward; democrats; docudrama; documentary; flight93; georgewbush; gorelickwall; gorlick; gorlickwall; grifters; groundzero; gypsies; letsroll; monica; moviereview; notbreakingnews; osama; pathto911; pentagon; perverts; reno; renowasanogre; renowasatroll; rudy; sandyberger; sandyburglar; scissors; sept11th; september112001; thieves; toddbeamer; tramps; twintowers; usecorrecttopics; w
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 661-675 next last
To: Rennes Templar
My question is WHY did ABC/Disney tell the truth? One would think such organizations would naturally go for the pro-left version, being part of the MSM.

Big time corporate execs do NOT like being told what to do, not by their High-a*&es in the Liberal party, not by some lawyer, no body. It really is a matter of free speech, IMO.

By showing their smarmy, little, souls the Dems have made a major boo-boo. ;) All these threats against ABC/Disney regarding license pulling will be null and void anyway, IF the movie helps to change anyone's mind about whom to vote for...there won't be any change of seats.

561 posted on 09/10/2006 11:58:06 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
Hope he taped it I doubt we see the same thing here if it shows the Clinton dereliction.
562 posted on 09/10/2006 11:59:03 AM PDT by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
'The Man Who Predicted 9/11'

I saw this the other night on the History channel and enjoyed it. I do recommend it to all who can see it.

563 posted on 09/10/2006 12:02:37 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie

Bttt


564 posted on 09/10/2006 12:03:55 PM PDT by Tinian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan
Mickey may have to go on the lamb for a while.

Please keep your filthy interspecies fantasies to yourself. Mice and lambs. Now that is just sick. Do you want me to ping a Moderator??

565 posted on 09/10/2006 12:06:37 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Not only is there no indication that Massoud ever said it, it is crystal clear that he wasn't anywhere near Kandahar province when the line in question is uttered.

That's the DU talking points, and you're sticking to them.

566 posted on 09/10/2006 12:06:50 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: Valin
"Keitel couldn't understand why the FBI didn't have Arabic translators, so the dialogue was changed on the spot," said a script supervisor."

Not that Keitel could be bothered with facts, but one of the first calls from the government following 9-11 was for Arabic translators. I remember it like it was yesterday.

567 posted on 09/10/2006 12:09:32 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
But the key message is something we saw here time and again, during the Clinton years- that Clinton's people thought about themselves, ahead of service to their country.


568 posted on 09/10/2006 12:10:30 PM PDT by New Perspective (Proud father of an 2 year old son with Down Syndrome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight

ROFL PIMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The DU'ers are saying that Sandy Burglar must sue!!!! OHHHHH Yes, Sandy Baby, LET'S SEE YOU IN COURT!!! Oh ho ho ho ho, too bad you can't get any more classified documents for your pants, because you will need their absorbing properties when you go on the stand!!!

They are also saying that someone should put it on Youtube to drop ABC's ratings tonight. Man, we should all watch just to have ABC's ratings go way up for a nonliberal show. Who knows, maybe they would put MORE nonliberal stuff on the air?


569 posted on 09/10/2006 12:11:49 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader
Down Under Blue Dress? If Path to 911 was shown in Aussie country yesterday, was there any mention of the Monica Lewinsky incident? One of the top reasons Clinton Fans became upset with the show was that it claimed the reason he failed to act on various Presidential duties, was that he was too focused on trying to weasel out of the uproar created over the blue dress incident to concentrate on what really needed attention. <9> On Friday, September 09, 2006, Sean Hannity interviewed the sole writer of Path to 911, Cyrus Nowrasteh. Hannity asked Cyrus if the film was being edited at that very moment. Cyrus admitted it was but did not know exactly what. Anyone hear that interview? I am now wondering how much of Monica was mentioned in the Aussie version? Here is why: last year, Katie Couric, did a TV news special surrounding a brief study she initiated with teens about hooking up (oral sex). I think it was based on either six weeks, or sixty days, of detailed discussions with a selected group of teens in the Florida area. It mentioned that the Blue Dress incident with Bill Clinton did not particularly impact the sudden rise in popularity within the mind set of teens on this ever-growing problem. To be sure the news special garnished marketing-hype, around the same time, an article came out in People Magazine, that MSN said was a developed project between one of magazine staff writers and Couric. By coincidence, another journalist, was set to reveal results in her own survey/study on the same topic, which was published in her syndicated newspaper column and on her site of whom I am a huge fan. <9> In her research, teens clearly admitted that Bill Clinton enhanced the sudden explosion in teen behavior, and not only teens, but in kids as young as eleven. You can still read it in the archive section on the site if you google Parent to Parent, Jodie Lynn. I looked it up this morning, to be sure it was still there. To save time, here is the link, http://www.parenttoparent.com/archives/TeensGoingOral.php <9> The research from the journalists became printed, quoted and a favorite subject among many, especially since they both held different responses from the two different study groups and Couric is a D and Lynn is a R. Also, Lynn had the guts to point a finger at Clinton and even printed an online response from a teen after the column had been printed. He describes the many flicks and toons Slick Willy got started. <9> This one comment, coming from a teen is particularly powerful because he is totally correct. If I were Clinton, there would be many things I would never want to be blamed about. One would be for making the Blue Dress scenario alive and well in eleven and twelve year olds, nor in any teen. OK, well, maybe he would. <9> Regardless, I am wondering if this will be one of the things we will not hear nor see too much about in America but yet it was in Aussie? If it was not shown there, then it won't fly here. My thought is that if Disney/ABC editors were editing it, as Cyrus mentioned, surely Clinton’s lawyers would not have overlooked a loophole that would allow an unedited version of the film to be shown in other countries. But, with all of the hoopla, maybe they did? Nah -- they would have caught it. <9> Sean will have Cyrus on tomorrow, 9/11/2006, for an update and Cyrus promised he would tell Sean how much it was edited. Whoa! Sorry to be so long winded. Just very passionate about our country and the future of our kids.
570 posted on 09/10/2006 12:12:52 PM PDT by MomPatrol4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight
"AMERICAblog obtains Path to 9/11, reports Berger scene 'beyond defamatory'"

So defamatory, it's true.

571 posted on 09/10/2006 12:15:59 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: MomPatrol4Freedom
Down Under Blue Dress?

If Path to 911 was shown in Aussie country yesterday, was there any mention of the Monica Lewinsky incident? One of the top reasons Clinton Fans became upset with the show was that it claimed the reason he failed to act on various Presidential duties, was that he was too focused on trying to weasel out of the uproar created over the blue dress incident to concentrate on what really needed attention.

On Friday, September 09, 2006, Sean Hannity interviewed the sole writer of Path to 911, Cyrus Nowrasteh. Hannity asked Cyrus if the film was being edited at that very moment. Cyrus admitted it was but did not know exactly what. Anyone hear that interview? I am now wondering how much of Monica was mentioned in the Aussie version? Here is why: last year, Katie Couric, did a TV news special surrounding a brief study she initiated with teens about hooking up (oral sex). I think it was based on either six weeks, or sixty days, of detailed discussions with a selected group of teens in the Florida area. It mentioned that the Blue Dress incident with Bill Clinton did not particularly impact the sudden rise in popularity within the mind set of teens on this ever-growing problem.

To be sure the news special garnished marketing-hype, around the same time, an article came out in People Magazine, that MSN said was a developed project between one of magazine staff writers and Couric. By coincidence, another journalist, was set to reveal results in her own survey/study on the same topic, which was published in her syndicated newspaper column and on her site of whom I am a huge fan.

In her research, teens clearly admitted that Bill Clinton enhanced the sudden explosion in teen behavior, and not only teens, but in kids as young as eleven. You can still read it in the archive section on the site if you google Parent to Parent, Jodie Lynn. I looked it up this morning, to be sure it was still there. To save time, here is the link: http://www.parenttoparent.com/archives/TeensGoingOral.php

The research from the journalists became printed, quoted and a favorite subject among many, especially since they both held different responses from the two different study groups and Couric is a D and Lynn is a R. Also, Lynn had the guts to point a finger at Clinton and even printed an online response from a teen after the column had been printed. He describes the many flicks and toons Slick Willy got started.

This one comment, coming from a teen is particularly powerful because he is totally correct. If I were Clinton, there would be many things I would never want to be blamed about. One would be for making the Blue Dress scenario alive and well in eleven and twelve year olds, nor in any teen. OK, well, maybe he would.

Regardless, I am wondering if this will be one of the things we will not hear nor see too much about in America but yet it was in Aussie? If it was not shown there, then it won't fly here. My thought is that if Disney/ABC editors were editing it, as Cyrus mentioned, surely Clinton’s lawyers would not have overlooked a loophole that would allow an unedited version of the film to be shown in other countries. But, with all of the hoopla, maybe they did? Nah -- they would have caught it.

Sean will have Cyrus on tomorrow, 9/11/2006, for an update and Cyrus promised he would tell Sean how much it was edited. Whoa! Sorry to be so long winded. Just very passionate about our country and the future of our kids.

572 posted on 09/10/2006 12:17:58 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

I'm reading the Looming Tower by Lawrence Write right now and O'Neill did have an Arabic translator with him at least during the Kolbar towers investigation.
(BTY EXCELLANT book.)

(a little off topic but I never let a little thing like that stop me)
(Muslim) Informants in American Service
The Strategy Page ^ | June 4, 2006 | The Strategy Page

http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/1643576/posts
Posted on 06/05/2006 7:56:30 AM CDT by Little Ray


A recent terrorist trial, and conviction, of an Islamic terrorists in New York City brought out the extent to which police have infiltrated Moslem communities in order to uncover terrorist plots. While most of this counter-terrorist activity within Moslem communities is kept secret, enough information has leaked out to make it clear that it's no accident that the United States has not suffered another terrorist attack since September 11, 2001.

There is an extensive informant network within Moslem communities all over the United States. The FBI was pleasantly surprised right after September 11, 2001, by the number of calls they got from American Moslems, reporting suspicious events in their communities, or volunteering to keep an eye on things. It turned out that there was a substantial number of American Moslems, most of them recent immigrants (legal and illegal) that were pro al Qaeda. These attitudes had been causing distress among American Moslems since the 1990s. There had been violence, and even some murders, as the Islamic radicals tried to take control of Mosques, and other Moslem immigrant organizations.
(snip)


573 posted on 09/10/2006 12:18:40 PM PDT by Valin (http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Sean Hannity interviewed the sole writer of Path to 911, Cyrus Nowrasteh. Hannity asked Cyrus if the film was being edited at that very moment. Cyrus admitted it was but did not know exactly what. Anyone hear that interview?

Yes I did, and am looking forward to hearing what he say Monday.


574 posted on 09/10/2006 12:20:38 PM PDT by Valin (http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: All; Cementjungle

.

Thank you for your kindness, Cementjungle.

Here's Pictures of the loving Widow SUSAN RESCORLA's joyful unveiling of her 9/11 Lifesaver RICK RESCORLA's bronze 'Follow Me' Statue ...on April 1, 2006 at Ft. Benning, Georgia.

http://www.RickRescorla.com/The%20Statue.htm

.


575 posted on 09/10/2006 12:21:12 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.comy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: onyx

My best friend and infidel has been living in Cairo for the past 2 years (not an easy thing to do), she suggested that we as infidels celebrate Haramadan during the other "holiday".


576 posted on 09/10/2006 12:21:24 PM PDT by interrogatorgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123
"My question is WHY did ABC/Disney tell the truth?"

This is their 9/11 presentation. A lot of it seems to be based on ABC journalist John Miller's reports. He should know, he was there in Afghanistan. Just by viewing the trailers it appears that a very large portion of the film is very damning to Clinton & co. I sure hope ABC has the guts to show it as is. From what I've seen on the clips, it appears to be historically accurate.

577 posted on 09/10/2006 12:21:43 PM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle; All
The DU'ers are saying that Sandy Burglar must sue...

By all means- we covered that "paragon" here:

-Yes, Down My Pants. Oh, Like You Haven't? The Sordid Sandburglar Story--

578 posted on 09/10/2006 12:21:57 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: Valin
What was weird about the interview between the writer of Path to 911 and Hannity, and you may have picked up on this too, was when Sean asked Cyrus if the film was based on THE TRUTH, Cyrus hesitated, and then said the material was taken from books, newspapers, media, reports, etc., did you notice that? Wonder what that meant? A pause, so not to reveal all sources, or a pause to represent that HE believed what he wrote to be true?
579 posted on 09/10/2006 12:39:16 PM PDT by MomPatrol4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

http://cgi.ebay.com/The-Path-To-9-11-DVD-ABC-World-Trade-Centers-Bin-Laden_W0QQitemZ130022251748QQihZ003QQcategoryZ18838QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem


580 posted on 09/10/2006 12:40:02 PM PDT by abner (Know islam, no peace; No islam, know peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 661-675 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson