Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biologist says evolution, religion can coexist
Lawrence Journal World ^ | 9/8/06 | Kenneth Miller

Posted on 09/09/2006 8:39:07 PM PDT by curiosity

“In the final analysis (God) used evolution to set us free.”

Brown University biologist Kenneth Miller used this quote from his book “Finding Darwin’s God” as a central point in his speech about simultaneously believing in evolution and religion.

Miller spoke to more than 500 people Thursday evening in the Kansas Union Ballroom.

He testified for the pro-evolution side in the recent lawsuit against the Dover, Pa., school district, where a federal judge ruled against the district’s teaching of intelligent design in biology classrooms. He said it was creationism in disguise.

Conservatives on the Kansas State Board of Education approved science standards last year that criticized evolution, but after the August primary election, it appears moderates will regain control of the board and eventually reinstate the former standards.

Miller gained several laughs from the audience during his speech as he described the Dover trial, including a scene when intelligent design proponent Michael Behe asked the judge if he could “move the evidence to the side.”

Plaintiffs’ attorney Eric Rothschild had stacked 58 scientific papers, nine books and other textbook chapters on evolutionary evidence supporting development of the human immune system in front of Behe on the witness stand.

Miller said religion and evolution are too often played as opposing forces and incorrectly identified as mutually exclusive. At Brown, a student once told him he could not worship at the university chapel and cited a book that places evolution as the fruit in the serpent’s mouth or a “tool of Satan.”

But Miller said the root of the portrayal of religion and evolution as opposites may come from scientists who have an “anti-theistic interpretation of evolution,” a stance he disagrees with.

“People of faith are shooting at the wrong target. They should not be shooting at evolution itself,” he said.

Miller, a Catholic, said evolution has been remarkably robust in answering criticism through fossil records, the fusing of human chromosomes and other examples.

Instead of attacking evolutionary theory, the argument should be against the anti-theistic interpretation of evolution, he said.

He quoted several scientists, philosophers and religious leaders, including Pope Benedict XVI, who has written: “Even the outcome of a truly contingent natural process can nonetheless fall within God’s providential plan for creation.”

“By understanding the mechanics of this world, what one is really doing is praising and glorifying God,” Miller said.

Miller will answer questions from the public at 10 a.m. today at the Hall Center for the Humanities.

The lecture was the first in the “Difficult Dialogues” series on “Knowledge: Faith & Reason,” presented by the Hall Center and the Biodiversity Institute.

Federal Judge John E. Jones III, who ruled in favor of the Dover plaintiffs, will speak Sept. 26.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: christianity; creation; creationism; crevo; crevolist; darwin; darwinism; evolution; id; idjunkscience; intelligentdesign; pavlovian; theism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 341-348 next last
To: VictoryGal
No, it doesn't because of this.

Gen 1:26&27 Then God said, "Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth." God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

Gen2:7 Then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.

Besides, it's man's resemblence to God, not God's resemblence to man. Man was created in the image of God not the image of an animal. He was created separately from the rest of the animal life from the dust of the earth, not formed from the likeness of an animal.

Besides, isn't it also possible that the ToE is wrong?

221 posted on 09/10/2006 10:09:58 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Why?


222 posted on 09/10/2006 10:15:49 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 308MBR
Can't we just all agree on Intelligent Design and stop picking the fly poop from the pepper shaker of life? At least it would allow more of us to think about things that actually matter, such as how to explain the concept of "inspiration" to a muslim.

My question is, why do you think you can limit GOD to Creating the universe only your way?

I posted this on another thread Friday.

Why this craziness? Why can 't a modern man that does not need Fauns, Pixies, Gnomes or Shamen, believe in Creation and Evolution? The story of Creation was the ancient way that uneducated man came to terms with his existence on the earth. Evolution was the manifestation and so to speak the engine of Creation. It is silly that human beings feel the need to pigeon hole God and fight over their understanding of him. I see Evolution in everything and therefore, with a little thought, know it only goes back to a point. Beyond and before that point is God. I have no time for fools that seem to think they were on the Ark with Noah, or in the Garden with Adam. I think some people need to get a little more faith instead of splitting hairs and butting heads into stone walls.

223 posted on 09/10/2006 10:37:09 PM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Theo
CHOOSE: JESUS, OR DARWIN.

Or you'll cut off his head?

Do you realize how you sound?

224 posted on 09/10/2006 10:47:09 PM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister
Yes why can't we all just get along? You already have your evolution as the state religion, funded by we the tax payers and the house of worship begins at the public school system. That gray blighted area that tells our young children they are descendant from animals.

Fret not nobody is going to require you or anyone else to think or believe differently.

There is the evidence of going on 40 years of what this belief system has produced so be happy.
225 posted on 09/10/2006 11:02:32 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

Awe, come on. Trying to insinuate that a creationist Christian is no different from a murderous Muslim?

To quote you, "Do you realize how you sound?"


226 posted on 09/10/2006 11:04:22 PM PDT by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

How reliable are the Scriptures? I believe they are very reliable. You seem to want to pick and choose. That you cynicaly lump God in with fairly tale beings says a lot about how you value Scripture....

Scripture may very well be more reliable than you currently think....


227 posted on 09/10/2006 11:08:32 PM PDT by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Theo
That you cynicaly lump God in with fairly tale beings says a lot about how you value Scripture....

I attempted to imply that you were the one that lumps God in with fairly tale beings by insisting that the First Chapter of Genesis is verbatim factual.

The first of a great many paradoxes to literal interpretation is that it clearly states that the Sun and Moon were not created until the fourth day. Yet, how can a day happen with no Sun and Moon. How can the first morning happen with no Sun?

How can you trust every scribe or monk to translate from ancient Hebrew and Greek and write words for the past thousands of years in just such a way that they mean exactly what you say they are supposed to mean in our language that has been cobbled together from Latin, Greek and Teutonic with a tremendous number of permutations up to the present? Have you ever read Chaucer?

WHAN that Aprille with his shoures soote
The droghte of Marche hath perced to the roote,
And bathed every veyne in swich licour,
Of which vertu engendred is the flour;
Whan Zephirus eek with his swete breeth
Inspired hath in every holt and heeth
The tendre croppes, and the yonge sonne
Hath in the Ram his halfe cours y-ronne,
And smale fowles maken melodye,
That slepen al the nacht with open ye,
(So priketh hem nature in hir corages:
Than longen folk to goon on pilgrimages,
And palmers for to seken straunge strondes,
To ferne halwes, couthe in sondry londes;
And specially, from every shires ende
Of Engelond, to Caunterbury they wende,
The holy blisful martir for to seke,
That hem hath holpen, whan that they were seke.

That is only six hundred years and a verbatim translation can't be done.

228 posted on 09/11/2006 1:17:47 AM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: stultorum

"That's what I always thought and continue to believe. It certainly ain't no theory."

Like anything else ... when facts don't support you ... then it's time to REDEFINE words to make it so.

Example: "I did NOT have sex with that woman"
Bill Clinton

In other words, ORAL SEX is not "SEX"
according godless Clinton.




229 posted on 09/11/2006 3:37:36 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
Biologist says evolution, religion can coexist
 

Of course it can!    But can evolution and Christianity???
 
 
Most Christians 'believe' Evolution because they do NOT know what their Bible says. 
If, as they say, they 'believe' the words of Jesus and the New Testament writers,
they have to decide what the following verses mean:
 
Acts 17:26-27
 26.  From one man he made every nation of men, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he determined the times set for them and the exact places where they should live.
 27.  God did this so that men would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us.
 
 
Romans 5:12-21
 12.  Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because all sinned--
 13.  for before the law was given, sin was in the world. But sin is not taken into account when there is no law.
 14.  Nevertheless, death reigned from the time of Adam to the time of Moses, even over those who did not sin by breaking a command, as did Adam, who was a pattern of the one to come.
 15.  But the gift is not like the trespass. For if the many died by the trespass of the one man, how much more did God's grace and the gift that came by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ, overflow to the many!
 16.  Again, the gift of God is not like the result of the one man's sin: The judgment followed one sin and brought condemnation, but the gift followed many trespasses and brought justification.
 17.  For if, by the trespass of the one man, death reigned through that one man, how much more will those who receive God's abundant provision of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man, Jesus Christ.
 18.  Consequently, just as the result of one trespass was condemnation for all men, so also the result of one act of righteousness was justification that brings life for all men.
 19.  For just as through the disobedience of the one man, the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man the many will be made righteous.
 20.  The law was added so that the trespass might increase. But where sin increased, grace increased all the more,
 21.  so that, just as sin reigned in death, so also grace might reign through righteousness to bring eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
 
 
 
If there were  no one man, that means SIN did NOT enter the World thru him.
 
If Adam was NOT the one man, that means SPIRITUAL DEATH did not come thru him.
 
If SIN did NOT enter the World thru the one man, that means Jesus does not save from SIN.
 
 
Are we to believe that the one man is symbolic?  Does that mean Jesus is symbolic as well?
 
 
The Theory of Evolution states that there WAS no one man, but a wide population that managed to inherit that last mutated gene that makes MEN different from APES.
 
 
 Acts 17:24-26

 24.  "The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands.
 25.  And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives all men life and breath and everything else.
 26.  From one man he made every nation of men, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he determined the times set for them and the exact places where they should live.

Was LUKE wrong about this?


 
 
1 Corinthians 11:8-9
 8.  For man did not come from woman, but woman from man;
 9.  neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.
 
1 Timothy 2:13
  For Adam was formed first, then Eve.  
 

 
 
Was Paul WRONG about these???
 

 
If so, is GOD so puny that He allows this 'inaccuracy' in His Word??
 
NIV Genesis 2:18
   The LORD God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him."

230 posted on 09/11/2006 5:35:46 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theo

I have pulled the CAPSLOCK key from my keyboards!!!


231 posted on 09/11/2006 5:38:08 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jessarah
How does a theistic evolutionist reconcile the difference?

By not knowing what the Book says!

232 posted on 09/11/2006 5:39:12 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 43north
 
Well, if you believe in the face of all of the evidence to the contrary that the Earth is 4,000 years old and that the Bible must be interpreted as absolutely factual rather than as a framework of God's teachings, you can think any dumb thing that you want to.
 
Ok, but......
 
 



 
Isa 48:3 ... I have declared the former things from the beginning; and they went forth out of My mouth, and I shewed them; I did [them] SUDDENLY, and they came to pass.
 

Indeed!!

Genesis 1
 
 1.  In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
 2.  Now the earth was  formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
 3.  And God said, "Let there be light," and there was light.
 
 
This is a GOD who creates by speaking; but; how LONG did it take?
 
Now Jesus was a man who had God-like powers.  Was HE God?   The Book says so.......
 
 
 
 
NIV Colossians 1:13-17
 13.  For he has rescued us from the dominion of darkness and brought us into the kingdom of the Son he loves,
 14.  in whom we have redemption,  the forgiveness of sins. 
 15.  He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
 16.  For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.
 17.  He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.
 
 
NIV Revelation 4:11
   "You are worthy, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they were created and have their being."
 
 
NIV Revelation 10:6
   And he swore by him who lives for ever and ever, who created the heavens and all that is in them, the earth and all that is in it, and the sea and all that is in it, and said, "There will be no more delay!

 
Notice that when this man speaks, things happen RIGHT NOW!   Not after some times passes and the body heals itself.
 
 
 
NIV Matthew 8:2-3
 2.  A man with leprosy  came and knelt before him and said, "Lord, if you are willing, you can make me clean."
 3.  Jesus reached out his hand and touched the man. "I am willing," he said. "Be clean!" Immediately he was cured  of his leprosy.
 
 
NIV Matthew 21:19
   Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, "May you never bear fruit again!" Immediately the tree withered.
 
 
NIV Mark 1:41-42
 41.  Filled with compassion, Jesus reached out his hand and touched the man. "I am willing," he said. "Be clean!"
 42.  Immediately the leprosy left him and he was cured.
 
 
NIV Mark 5:41-42
 41.  He took her by the hand and said to her, "Talitha koum!" (which means, "Little girl, I say to you, get up!").
 42.  Immediately the girl stood up and walked around (she was twelve years old). At this they were completely astonished.
 
 
NIV Mark 10:51-52
 51.  "What do you want me to do for you?" Jesus asked him.   The blind man said, "Rabbi, I want to see."
 52.  "Go," said Jesus, "your faith has healed you." Immediately he received his sight and followed Jesus along the road.
 
 
NIV Luke 5:13
  Jesus reached out his hand and touched the man. "I am willing," he said. "Be clean!" And Immediately the leprosy left him.
 
 
NIV Luke 5:24-25
 24.  But that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins. . . ." He said to the paralyzed man, "I tell you, get up, take your mat and go home."
 25.  Immediately he stood up in front of them, took what he had been lying on and went home praising God.
 
 
NIV Luke 8:44
  She came up behind him and touched the edge of his cloak, and Immediately her bleeding stopped.
 
 
NIV Luke 13:12-13
 12.  When Jesus saw her, he called her forward and said to her, "Woman, you are set free from your infirmity."
 13.  Then he put his hands on her, and Immediately she straightened up and praised God.
 
 
NIV Luke 18:42-43
 42.  Jesus said to him, "Receive your sight; your faith has healed you."
 43.  Immediately he received his sight and followed Jesus, praising God. When all the people saw it, they also praised God.
 
 
NIV Acts 9:33-35
 33.  There he found a man named Aeneas, a paralytic who had been bedridden for eight years.
 34.  "Aeneas," Peter said to him, "Jesus Christ heals you. Get up and take care of your mat." Immediately Aeneas got up.
 35.  All those who lived in Lydda and Sharon saw him and turned to the Lord.
 
 
NIV Matthew 8:13
 13.  Then Jesus said to the centurion, "Go! It will be done just as you believed it would." And his servant was healed at that very hour.
 
 
NIV Matthew 15:28
 28.  Then Jesus answered, "Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted." And her daughter was healed from that very hour.


 
Now if this same personage, who does things in an instant;  how LONG would it take Him to CREATE all that we find around us???


233 posted on 09/11/2006 5:41:04 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.
However, I reiterate that evolution, as one of God's chosen method for creation, is entirely compatible with Christianity.

But is the reverse true?

234 posted on 09/11/2006 5:42:24 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom
All I am asking you to do, is explain to Dave Lone Ranger as you explained to me, about how the races of men were created on the 6th day, and Adam on the 8th day...
 
 

This is gonna be SOME 'explanation', Lucy!   ;^)
 
 
 
NIV Genesis 1:26-31
 26.  Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground."
 27.  So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.
 28.  God blessed them and said to them, "Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground."
 29.  Then God said, "I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food.
 30.  And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds of the air and all the creatures that move on the ground--everything that has the breath of life in it--I give every green plant for food." And it was so.
 31.  God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning--the sixth day.

235 posted on 09/11/2006 5:47:10 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
The flesh body is descent from one generation to the next and there is no way that all flesh alive on this planet today came from just two people.

Are you SURE??

236 posted on 09/11/2006 5:50:35 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: 43north
How do we even know what God's image is?
 
 
 
I'm glad you asked!   ;^)
 

NIV 2 Corinthians 4:4
   The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.
 
NIV Colossians 1:15
   He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.

237 posted on 09/11/2006 5:53:35 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Like anything else ... when facts don't support you ... then it's time to REDEFINE words to make it so.

Are you attempting to justify your false claims about evolution, and about other subjects?
238 posted on 09/11/2006 5:55:24 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
“In the final analysis (God) used evolution to set us free.”

In the final analysis, God's nature changes when we change the description of God's acts.

239 posted on 09/11/2006 5:55:49 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
 
Your paranoia is not evidence of any deliberate motive on behalf of an anti-Christian motive in Charles Darwin's work.
Ok......

Charles Darwin (1809-1882)

"By further reflecting that the clearest evidence would be requisite to make any sane man believe in the miracles by which Christianity is supported,—and that the more we know of the fixed laws of nature the more incredible do miracles become,—that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost incomprehensible by us,—that the Gospels cannot be proven to have been written simultaneously with the events,—that they differ in many important details, far too important, as it seemed to me to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies of eye witnesses;—by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelation. The fact that many fake religions have spread over large portions of the earth like wildfire had some weight with me. But I was very unwilling to give up my belief; I feel sure of this, for I can remember often and often inventing day-dreams of old letters between distinguished Romans, and manuscripts being discovered at Pompeii or elsewhere, which confirmed in the most striking manner all that was written in the Gospels. But I found it more and more difficult, with free scope given to my imagination, to invent evidence which would suffice to convince me. Thus disbelief crept over me at a very slow rate, but was at last complete. The rate was so slow that I felt no distress, and have never since doubted even for a single second that my conclusion was correct."

( Charles Darwin in his Autobiography of Charles Darwin, Dover Publications, 1992, p. 62. )


Charles Darwin (1809-1882)

"I think that generally (& more & more as I grow older), but not always, that an agnostic would be the most correct description of my state of mind."

( Quoted from Adrian Desmond and James Moore, Darwin: The Life of a Tormented Evolutionist, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1991, p. 636. )


240 posted on 09/11/2006 5:55:51 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 341-348 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson