Posted on 09/07/2006 6:11:42 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
The attack by Bill Clinton and his allies on the upcoming ABC miniseries "The Path to 9/11" is "outrageous," charges former Clinton aide Dick Morris.
As NewsMax has reported, Bill Clinton through his surrogates have demanded that ABC "correct all errors" in the docudrama or pull it from the air, charging that it is a "fictitious rewriting of history" regarding President Clinton's handling of the terrorist threat.
But Morris claims that Clinton's national security adviser, Sandy Berger, and the president himself "were both responsible for failing to catch or kill bin Laden on several different occasions."
Morris has served Clinton as an advisor for twenty years and notably as Clinton's senior campaign strategist during his 1996 re-election.
Morris states that the evidence for this failure is documented in the 9/11 Commission's report and summarized in "Because He Could," the book about Clinton that Morris co-authored with his wife Eileen McGann.
The commission's report, released in the summer of 2004, "highlighted the weak, incompetent, hesitant, and inconsistent attempts of the Clinton administration to kill or capture Osama bin Laden," according to the book, which devotes an entire chapter to Clinton's mishandling of the threat.
"The report's account shows the president and his advisers at their worst."
One time, the United States "canceled an attempt to kidnap bin Laden out of concern that we might injure or kill him and be accused of using assassination as a policy tool," Morris told NewsMax.
"The president had yet to make a finding that it was OK to kill bin Laden. The reason he had not is that he did not yet know bin Laden's connection to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. The reason he did not know that is that he did not fast-track the investigation.
"A second time, we did fire missiles but alerted the Pakistani military to our plans and they tipped off bin Laden, and he escaped."
According to the commission's report, the United States alerted Pakistan because the missiles targeting bin Laden, who was in Afghanistan, had to cross Pakistan, and U.S. officials did not want Pakistan to think the missiles came from India.
"A third time, our plans to attack by missile were canceled, partially out of chagrin over having missed him before and partially because we had just bombed the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade by mistake and were worried about being called trigger happy," said Morris.
"The president was also concerned about civilian deaths in any such attack.
"The underlying theme of the ABC coverage, that he was distracted by impeachment, is of course true. But more so, he was gun-shy" because he was afraid conservatives would say he had launched a failed attack "in an effort to 'wag the dog' and distract people from the Monica Lewinsky affair."
Morris concluded: "His fear of such attacks on him inhibited him from acting."
Good for you!
Huh? Mr. Wag-the-Dog was too distracted by impeachment to shoot off cruise missiles?
watching it? it hasn't aired yet.
what's the word today, ABC is editing it right? so, we know not to watch it now. so how were we sucked in? will you watch an edited show? will you buy the DVD now? of course not.
And that alone tells you how seriously he took his job of CIC and his oath to protect and defend. It is all about Bill as usual. And we stand a chance of this corrupt pair being in command once again.
You are right, but nothing can change their minds. In fact, they thought Clinton was too conservative... Peaceniks marched every year here in Pittsburgh at least, against the sanctions against Saddam, and assorted other "atrocities" against Iraq. Nothing can change their minds.
GREAT points. It is only the Dems who want to censor POLITICAL speech, the speech that was supposed to have the most iron-clad protection. McCain-Feingold, this miniseries and the countless times across this country conservatives are heckled, attacked physically, newspapers stolen, John Kerry film which was never aired unedited... It's even as minor as my local bookstore- people are constantly moving the socialist mags in front of conservative mags. Nothing is too minor for these leftist scum. They are un-American. I am infuriated that the press lets the Dem pols push ABC around.
Thank you. It was a slow awakening, but increased in intensity as the years went on.
1992 was the first year I DIDN'T vote Democrat, and I've never looked back! I owe most of this wonderous conversion to Clinton. He made me realize I didn't have the stomach to be a Democrat anymore.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.