Dick Morris: Clinton Attack 'Outrageous'

NewsMax ^ | 8 September 2006

[mass55th]

""The president was also concerned about civilian deaths in any such attack."

He was more concerned over his legacy and poll numbers.

[ALOHA RONNIE]

.

"DICK MORRIS is dead on" =

...JOHN ZIEGLER on KFI Los Angeles Radio

http://www.KFI640.com

(Live Streaming)


Guest Coming up right now =

This 9/11 TV Special's SCREENWRITER

.

[cibco]

"I voted for Clinton twice. I am constantly amazed at how ham-handed he appears to me now. This is just so much overkill."

Glad you saw the reasoning. Welcome aboard from a hetro conservative. {:0)

[RedEyeJack]

Bingo...

If the Clinton's and Democrats say that the record doesn't show the events described took place the answer is...

Of course not! What do you think Sandy Berger's mission was when he destroyed the records at the national archives?

The Democrats may have stepped into it big time... ABC now does the sequel exposing Berger and his nefarious actions in altering the records.

[RedEyeJack]

Bingo...

If the Clinton's and Democrats say that the record doesn't show the events described took place the answer is...

Of course not! What do you think Sandy Berger's mission was when he destroyed the records at the national archives?

The Democrats may have stepped into it big time... ABC now does the sequel exposing Berger and his nefarious actions in altering the records.

[Stultis]

As per their usual pattern, just when you thinks the Dims could not possibly act more outrageously, they do!

The entire Dim Senate leadership has now composed, sent and sign a threatening letter demanding that the series not be aired! Sitting U.S. Senators, speaking and writing as such, threatening private media -- a broadcaster and it's production companies -- in an affirmed intent to coerce CENSORSHIP of their speech and their work product. Breath taking!

[Sacajaweau]

Yup...Waiting for Berger to blurt to someone: "It's impossible. I burned that."

And we might just have hit the nail on the head!!

[NewLand]

Remember the Reagan show...it got pulled by see bs...

Yes, but there is no comparison here in many, many ways.

[HHFi]

...were worried about being called trigger happy...he was gun-shy" because he was afraid conservatives would say...

Note to Charlie Gibson: This is what happens when a president is more concerned with what people think of him and say about him than he is with doing what's necessary to defend America.

[Danae]

Ya know, I have to think that the Clintons and their little henchmen (Maddie Notsobright, and Sandy "socks" Burgler) have just made clear they they are INDEED guilty of what the 9/11 commission said they were.

Come hell or high water, they will continue the practices of what got them into power to begin with. Oughtright Lies, only now we KNOW them to be Liars and Criminals.

Game up, you lose Clintonistas. You just cost Hildabeast the Primary in 08.

I can't thank you enough!

[Doogle]

...don't let the RATS equate the Reagan "movie" with what they are doing now. This is about UBL and his ilk, and what the 9/11 commission found (the tv movie adviser was Kean who had the ability to correct any mistakes)
The movie a few years ago about the Reagan's was just that ..a hit piece on the Reagan's. Can anyone imagine a TV movie about the "clintons"....how hillary learns to throw lamps?...her "french" when blowing her top?, what she told Chelsea about military people in and around the WH? Where was Hillary while Monica was bobbin for pizza? She wasn't upset about him dropping pants in the oral Office...she was upset about HER future.


Doogle

[Howlin]

I really do think that's what this ALL is about, whatever Sandy stole.

I hope I live long enough to find out what it was/is.

[TampaDude]

Vince
Foster
was
MURDERED

'nuff said!

[FreeKeys]

...we are smart enough to fill in the blanks...us bloggers are good at that...

On "The Grapevine" during "Special Report With Brit Hume" tonight, Brit reported that "Democratic bloggers plan to 'Google bomb' the 9/11 docudrama" so that anyone trying to look it up will only find moonbat putdowns among the first several dozen search results. So make sure your blog and website entries have "The Path to 9/11" "miniseries" "ABC" "9-11" "WTC" "twin towers" and anything else you can think of, and submit your site at http://www.google.com/addurl/?continue=/addurl.

[Doogle]

I really do think that's what this ALL is about, whatever Sandy stole.

...keep in mind he made several trips....it's not only what he stole...its also what he could have intentionally left behind (replaced)...no one seems to be talking about that..

Doogle

[Fledermaus]

It's not so much what he took out and destroyed...later reporting says Sandy PUT BACK some "documents" and it is those I want to see.

Basically, he removed the damaging documents and replaced them with favorable ones.

Why Bush let this guy off the hook is beyond me. I wish GW never stopped drinking...in those days he was a ruthless cutthroat and Sandy Burgler would have felt the wrath.

I'm not a Christian but I love them to death. But in this instance Sandy needs to be treated harshly and not with brotherly love. Bush doesn't mind wiping out our enemies. I just wish he'd realize they are in the DNC as well.

[hardworking]

Some of my co-workers are already calling this right-wing propaganda since "Massa Bill" has pronounced it as such.

But they will suck up every drop of pig-vomit that Michael Moore spews out as Gospel.

You, dear poster, have just defined how totalitarian governments come to power.

[MaineVoter2002]

This story has legs. Not very smart for the dems to do this. It's totally against freedom of speech. I see this story growing momentum through the weekend!

http://www.cafenetamerica.com

[Fledermaus]

The CBS Reagan movie was pulled due to consumer pressure, not political pressure from the GOP like we are seeing now.

And they still showed in on Showtime, both being owned by Viacom, and it tanked there too because it was so blatantly false and bad.

In this case we have actual members of Congress threatening censorship. Major difference. Of course, these are the same morons on the left that read into the First Amendment the "separation of church and state" that isn't in there while they ignore the "free exercise thereof" and "Congress shall make no law" pretending reading the Bible in public school is establishing a religion.

One of these days we are going to have to protect our First Amendment rights against the left wing traitors and enemies by exercising our Second Amendment rights.

[infowarrior]

And I've never understood why some conservatives almost hold their political skills in near awe.

Color me as *one* conservative who never held the Clintons' political skill in awe, or anywhere near it. They were, and still are today, largely creatures of media invention. What has changed, is that the media "sold their collective souls" to keep their Frankenstein's monster in power, and now, their well of credibility is bone-dry, in a time where they no longer reign unchallenged in the ability to inform the public...

Only now, are they beginning to realize the devil's bargain they made back in 1992. Now, their wailing, and gnashing of teeth will begin...

the infowarrior