Senate Democratic leadership threatens Disney with legal and legislative sanctions

americablog.blogspot.com ^ | September 07, 2006 | John in DC

[Mo1]

Senate Democratic leadership threatens Disney with legal and legislative sanctions
by John in DC - 9/07/2006 06:02:00 PM

This letter was sent today by the entire Democratic leadership of the US Senate. This letter is such a major shot across the bow of Disney, it's not even funny. It is FILLED with veiled threats, both legal and legislative, against Disney. US Senators don't make threats like this, especially the entire Democratic leadership en masse, unless they mean it. Disney is in serious trouble.

Read it, then read my analysis of it below:

September 7, 2006

Mr. Robert A. Iger
President and CEO
The Walt Disney Company
500 South Buena Vista Street
Burbank CA 91521

Dear Mr. Iger,

We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming broadcast of The Path to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless reports from experts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and serious inaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the American people about the tragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day. Furthermore, the manner in which this program has been developed, funded, and advertised suggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like Disney and a major and well respected news organization like ABC. We therefore urge you to cancel this broadcast to cease Disney’s plans to use it as a teaching tool in schools across America through Scholastic. Presenting such deeply flawed and factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children would be a gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law, to your shareholders, and to the nation.

The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest. Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty of broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open and accurate discussion of political ideas and events.

Disney and ABC claim this program to be based on the 9/11 Commission Report and are using that assertion as part of the promotional campaign for it. The 9/11 Commission is the most respected American authority on the 9/11 attacks, and association with it carries a special responsibility. Indeed, the very events themselves on 9/11, so tragic as they were, demand extreme care by any who attempt to use those events as part of an entertainment or educational program. To quote Steve McPhereson, president of ABC Entertainment, “When you take on the responsibility of telling the story behind such an important event, it is absolutely critical that you get it right.”

Unfortunately, it appears Disney and ABC got it totally wrong.

Despite claims by your network’s representatives that The Path to 9/11 is based on the report of the 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Commissioners themselves, as well as other experts on the issues, disagree.

Richard Ben-Veniste, speaking for himself and fellow 9/11 Commissioners who recently viewed the program, said, “As we were watching, we were trying to think how they could have misinterpreted the 9/11 Commission’s findings the way that they had.” [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]

Richard Clarke, the former counter-terrorism czar, and a national security advisor to ABC has described the program as “deeply flawed” and said of the program’s depiction of a Clinton official hanging up on an intelligence agent, “It’s 180 degrees from what happened.” [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]

Reports suggest that an FBI agent who worked on 9/11 and served as a consultant to ABC on this program quit halfway through because, “he thought they were making things up.” [MSNBC, September 7, 2006]

Even Thomas Kean, who serves as a paid consultant to the miniseries, has admitted that scenes in the film are fictionalized. [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]

That Disney would seek to broadcast an admittedly and proven false recounting of the events of 9/11 raises serious questions about the motivations of its creators and those who approved the deeply flawed program. Finally, that Disney plans to air commercial-free a program that reportedly cost it $40 million to produce serves to add fuel to these concerns.

These concerns are made all the more pressing by the political leaning of and the public statements made by the writer/producer of this miniseries, Mr. Cyrus Nowrasteh, in promoting this miniseries across conservative blogs and talk shows.

Frankly, that ABC and Disney would consider airing a program that could be construed as right-wing political propaganda on such a grave and important event involving the security of our nation is a discredit both to the Disney brand and to the legacy of honesty built at ABC by honorable individuals from David Brinkley to Peter Jennings. Furthermore, that Disney would seek to use Scholastic to promote this misguided programming to American children as a substitute for factual information is a disgrace.

As 9/11 Commission member Jamie Gorelick said, “It is critically important to the safety of our nation that our citizens, and particularly our school children, understand what actually happened and why – so that we can proceed from a common understanding of what went wrong and act with unity to make our country safer.”

Should Disney allow this programming to proceed as planned, the factual record, millions of viewers, countless schoolchildren, and the reputation of Disney as a corporation worthy of the trust of the American people and the United States Congress will be deeply damaged. We urge you, after full consideration of the facts, to uphold your responsibilities as a respected member of American society and as a beneficiary of the free use of the public airwaves to cancel this factually inaccurate and deeply misguided program. We look forward to hearing back from you soon.

Sincerely,

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid
Assistant Democratic Leader Dick Durbin
Senator Debbie Stabenow
Senator Charles Schumer
Senator Byron Dorgan

The Senate Democratic leadership just threatened Disney's broadcast license. Not the use of the word "trustee" at the beginning of the letter and "trust" at the end. This is nothing less than an implicit threat that if Disney tries to meddle in the US elections on behalf of the Republicans, they will pay a very serious price when the Democrats get back in power, or even before.

This raises the stakes incredibly for Disney.

[SE Mom]

And...let's not forget that a film depicting the assassination of President Bush "provokes thought and insight"....

Hiya eeevil!

[Dead Dog]

Same as it did with "The Passion" and the same as some of us did with "The Davinci Code".

I know I will watch it.

[tubebender]

Bttt for later read...

[AmeriBrit]

Go to Bill C's post and also those of Jayna Davis if you can remember what screen name she posts under and it's all spelled out there why they want the 9/11 movie canceled.

Warning: A lot of reading.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/user-posts?id=20453

[jrooney]

Then how did we have Osama on Predator camera at his training camp in the desert?

[SeaBiscuit]

"Amazing....

teaching, speaking, and writing books that claim 9/11 was orchestrated by the Bush Admin is "FREE SPEECH".......

Sharing how BJ refused to deal with Osama when he could is now worthy of CONGRESSIONAL threats?

how can anyone doubt these people are commies?"

Deserves a repost.

[demkicker]

Only when it's Michael Moore's and his ilk's freedom of speech.

[Howlin]

I think that's a done deal.

[OldFriend]

Heard slick willie saying they didn't move in on OBL because they were afraid of collateral damage since he was surrounded by women and children.

That statement has got to be on lexis/nexis

[rodguy911]

How can anyone doubt these people are commies? Excellent point and I never doubted it, but I am still powerless to do anything other than doing what I am.

This is a time when our elected officials need to get off their asses and actually do something! Take a stand, speak out, and get tough for a change, RINOism won't work here.

[Brizick]

I sent e-mail to 'The Turban'.

I told him his threat sounds like an episode from the 'Sopranos'.

[onyx]

Contact Us

Home

About Google

 Contact Us

  Share Success

  Google Newsletter

Find on this site:

Thanks for your interest in Google.

Google's headquarters are located in the heart of Silicon Valley.

Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
phone: (650) 253-0000
fax: (650) 253-0001

Specific Inquiries

	• Webmaster Info		Valuable resource for those responsible for web pages.
	• We're Hiring		Search or browse our job openings.
	• Advertising		Submit specific questions for AdWords or AdSense. Rate your experience with an advertiser.
	• Business Solutions		Earn more revenue from your site, make corporate search easier.
	• Enterprise Solutions		Submit your information request for enterprise solutions.
	• Business Proposals		Submit your business proposal to us.
	• Google Permissions		View our trademark guidelines and trademark complaint procedure.
	• Security Issues		Report a security issue related to Google's services or systems
	• Press Center		Press releases, articles, achievements, requests for speakers, and more.

Help with Google Services

You can find up-to-date info for all of our services – from Google Web Search and Gmail to Google AdWords and Google AdSense – by visiting the Google Help page. From there, you can navigate to a specific service's help page and browse through hundreds of commonly asked questions, find answers in a help group, or send us your comments and suggestions.

Note: If you'd like to remove content from Google's search index, please click here.

©2006 Google - Home - About Google - We're Hiring - Site Map

[Peach]

Good one, Race. We can all see just how much priority Clinton gave terrorism. That is to say, pretty much below the level of zero.

[Bullfrogg]

As you already know, Howlin There may be some truth in the documentary, and they have a lot to hide, as usual. Violation of the constitution of free speech.

Bullfrog

[Peach]

ROFL

[jrooney]

Someone should ask Clintoon - What about our women and children Osama murdered?

[Txsleuth]

rod...I share your frustration...but, it just wouldn't be "presidential" for President Bush to say anything about this...

He respects the "office" of the POTUS too much...in fact, he would come closer to objecting to the movie on CLINTON'S BEHALF...than objecting to the Clinton's trying to stop it.

God love him...but that is just the way he is...remember the day they unveiled the portraits of Bubba and Rodham??

[OldFriend]

I've been part of the right wing conspiracy, a right wing thug, and now a harpie.

Fine with me, I'm all of those things and more!

DON'T MESS WITH ME

[small voice in the wilderness]

So was I.......and onyx, too! We were told that we're just old women with no lives, living off our husbands -- and we never leave the house. Basically, she told us we were pathetic old bitter biddies.

OMG! I missed this! WHO would be so ignorant of this site as to get it so wrong? LOL! I can't wait to come across this one!

[mdittmar]

The old media and the terrorists must love this.

This little t.v. show won't change a single mind.

I find it all "so amusing".

Music break.