Posted on 09/07/2006 4:12:34 PM PDT by Mo1
Senate Democratic leadership threatens Disney with legal and legislative sanctions
by John in DC - 9/07/2006 06:02:00 PM
This letter was sent today by the entire Democratic leadership of the US Senate. This letter is such a major shot across the bow of Disney, it's not even funny. It is FILLED with veiled threats, both legal and legislative, against Disney. US Senators don't make threats like this, especially the entire Democratic leadership en masse, unless they mean it. Disney is in serious trouble.
Read it, then read my analysis of it below:September 7, 2006
The Senate Democratic leadership just threatened Disney's broadcast license. Not the use of the word "trustee" at the beginning of the letter and "trust" at the end. This is nothing less than an implicit threat that if Disney tries to meddle in the US elections on behalf of the Republicans, they will pay a very serious price when the Democrats get back in power, or even before.
Mr. Robert A. Iger
President and CEO
The Walt Disney Company
500 South Buena Vista Street
Burbank CA 91521
Dear Mr. Iger,
We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming broadcast of The Path to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless reports from experts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and serious inaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the American people about the tragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day. Furthermore, the manner in which this program has been developed, funded, and advertised suggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like Disney and a major and well respected news organization like ABC. We therefore urge you to cancel this broadcast to cease Disney’s plans to use it as a teaching tool in schools across America through Scholastic. Presenting such deeply flawed and factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children would be a gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law, to your shareholders, and to the nation.
The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest. Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty of broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open and accurate discussion of political ideas and events.
Disney and ABC claim this program to be based on the 9/11 Commission Report and are using that assertion as part of the promotional campaign for it. The 9/11 Commission is the most respected American authority on the 9/11 attacks, and association with it carries a special responsibility. Indeed, the very events themselves on 9/11, so tragic as they were, demand extreme care by any who attempt to use those events as part of an entertainment or educational program. To quote Steve McPhereson, president of ABC Entertainment, “When you take on the responsibility of telling the story behind such an important event, it is absolutely critical that you get it right.”
Unfortunately, it appears Disney and ABC got it totally wrong.
Despite claims by your network’s representatives that The Path to 9/11 is based on the report of the 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Commissioners themselves, as well as other experts on the issues, disagree.
Richard Ben-Veniste, speaking for himself and fellow 9/11 Commissioners who recently viewed the program, said, “As we were watching, we were trying to think how they could have misinterpreted the 9/11 Commission’s findings the way that they had.” [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]
Richard Clarke, the former counter-terrorism czar, and a national security advisor to ABC has described the program as “deeply flawed” and said of the program’s depiction of a Clinton official hanging up on an intelligence agent, “It’s 180 degrees from what happened.” [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]
Reports suggest that an FBI agent who worked on 9/11 and served as a consultant to ABC on this program quit halfway through because, “he thought they were making things up.” [MSNBC, September 7, 2006]
Even Thomas Kean, who serves as a paid consultant to the miniseries, has admitted that scenes in the film are fictionalized. [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]
That Disney would seek to broadcast an admittedly and proven false recounting of the events of 9/11 raises serious questions about the motivations of its creators and those who approved the deeply flawed program. Finally, that Disney plans to air commercial-free a program that reportedly cost it $40 million to produce serves to add fuel to these concerns.
These concerns are made all the more pressing by the political leaning of and the public statements made by the writer/producer of this miniseries, Mr. Cyrus Nowrasteh, in promoting this miniseries across conservative blogs and talk shows.
Frankly, that ABC and Disney would consider airing a program that could be construed as right-wing political propaganda on such a grave and important event involving the security of our nation is a discredit both to the Disney brand and to the legacy of honesty built at ABC by honorable individuals from David Brinkley to Peter Jennings. Furthermore, that Disney would seek to use Scholastic to promote this misguided programming to American children as a substitute for factual information is a disgrace.
As 9/11 Commission member Jamie Gorelick said, “It is critically important to the safety of our nation that our citizens, and particularly our school children, understand what actually happened and why – so that we can proceed from a common understanding of what went wrong and act with unity to make our country safer.”
Should Disney allow this programming to proceed as planned, the factual record, millions of viewers, countless schoolchildren, and the reputation of Disney as a corporation worthy of the trust of the American people and the United States Congress will be deeply damaged. We urge you, after full consideration of the facts, to uphold your responsibilities as a respected member of American society and as a beneficiary of the free use of the public airwaves to cancel this factually inaccurate and deeply misguided program. We look forward to hearing back from you soon.
Sincerely,
Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid
Assistant Democratic Leader Dick Durbin
Senator Debbie Stabenow
Senator Charles Schumer
Senator Byron Dorgan
This raises the stakes incredibly for Disney.
You said it, Brother!
Clinton's Shadow Government; government-in-waiting?
These people scare the everliving hell out of me. We just cannot let these people take power from us.
What did he say before you changed...
Exactly. If this is what they do while they're out of power, imagine what they'll do while IN power.
But how could it not be? That's the rub.
If any film were to explore the "Path to", it would perforce begin with the 1993 WTC bombing and proceed forward.
And when you put these events in their proper historical context -- that is, during the Clinton administration -- it is virtually impossible not to cast the Clintonoids in a bad light.
It is the context, not the "spin", that damns them.
I'm certain he knows by now.
Let's see if he comes through!
How Bush's policies have created more terrorists, and that Bush is responsible for Iran being a threat now.
I have that book! It's fabulous and must read for all FReepers.
Today we've already seen ABC edit some of the film. The Dems see that blood in the weater, and are moving in.
That Dick Ben Venista, a supposedly objective (I know, stop laughing) member of what was supposed to be an objective committee, flipped out at a screening should be a message to the "real" conservatives here--this is what they do when they're OUT of power, but sense they may win in November.
If anyone here is still on the fence about staying home and "teaching them a lesson" in November, you should prepare your statements for your grandchildren--you'll have a lot of explaining to do if you let these thugs into power.
Anyone here want to go on the record and say that if the Dems take the House they WON'T impeach Bush? If so, I have a bridge to sell you in Chappaquiddick.
I can't wrap my mind around this. It's almost as though the Rats want MORE people to view the documentary and find out the details behind the censureship.
Fahrenheit 911 vs Path to 9/11 Ping!
The Senate Democrats are using the same tactics as Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Saddam Hussein.
Our soldiers are risking their lives for this kind of CRAP?
"Exactly. If this is what they do while they're out of power, imagine what they'll do while IN power."
Exactly. If this is what they do while they're out of power, imagine what they did when they were in power....
Worth a second post -
"To all you anti-Bush freepers that want to PUNISH THE GOP by staying home in November, THIS IS JUST A TASTE of the power abuses that will occur if the donks win power. Has 5 years erased your memory of the Clintons and what power abuses they wielded? Wake Up!"
No truer words have be written here today.
Here's another one: how about the show on the floor of the Senate yesterday when the Democrats were trying to hold a "no-confidence" vote against Rumsfeld -- an entity that does not even EXIST in our form of government.
But that didn't bother them at all.
A taste? Hell, it's a DOWNPOUR.
People, we cannot win this battle. the MSM has the ability to connect with too many uneducated voters.
This movie is already too tarnished to make a difference in peoples minds. The hatchet job will be complete over the next two days. Everyone's local papers will run AP stories tomorrow that will claim that all the bad stuff about Clinton is a republican trick. The fix is in.
The only way to put these bastards in their places is to hold your nose and pull that lever for the GOP candidate in your district. I do not care how ticked you are over the current GOP leaders.
I cannot imagine anything worse than Pelosi and Reid in charge. These folks will allow the thermonuclear destruction of an American city before they will call ragheaded muslim facists for what they are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.