Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Detroit clerk to purge 55,000 names from voter rolls
AP via Mlive.com ^ | 07/18/2006 | Unknown

Posted on 07/18/2006 1:51:40 PM PDT by oxcart

DETROIT (AP) — The city clerk plans to purge the names of nearly 55,000 dead people and those who no longer live in the city from voting rolls as part of an effort to ensure integrity in elections.

Clerk Janice Winfrey bought lists of deaths from the state and city health department. Then she moved to eliminate the names of people who hadn't cast a ballot since before the 2002 election and who had been mailed voter card registration renewal forms that were returned as undeliverable.

Already the names of about 33,000 deceased voters have been removed, The Detroit News reported Tuesday. The rest can be removed after the August primary. Winfrey estimates another 40,000 names can be removed under a similar process in 2008.

Winfrey was elected in November. She unseated Jackie L. Currie, who had held the post since 1994 and was embroiled in a federal probe of her handling of absentee ballots.

Last year, the city had 637,000 registered voters, a figure critics say had to be wrong since according to census figures, Detroit only had 630,000 people 18 or older who were eligible to vote.

In February, the newspaper published a review of ballots cast in the November election that showed many were cast under the names of people who have died, were serving time in prison or did not live in the city.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: 20004election; 2006election; crime; dead; deadvoters; detroit; dirtytricks; disenfranchised; election2004; election2006; electionlaws; howtostealanelection; michigan; rattricks; repository; thedeaddie; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: JimRed; skaterboy
Clerk Janice Winfrey bought lists of deaths from the state and city health department.Yes, apparently she had to buy the lists. Why one government agency should have to pay for mere information from another government agency puzzles me.

In fact, death lists should be automatically forwarded to the appropriate boards of elections.
It could be that her buying the lists like any private citizen was an end run around anticipated civil servant shenanigans. Joan Q. Public pays the fee and takes the list, you hardly look at her twice. The new City Clerk in office after a scandal - soon as the request comes in through appropriate governmental channels and with official agency header, it might inspire a little um ... creativity from the records provider. Sad to imagine corruption that deep, but *shrug* there ya go.
61 posted on 07/18/2006 3:03:20 PM PDT by Titan Magroyne (Suicide Bomb Instructor: "Now pay attention, I'm only gonna do this once...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Thanks for making my point with specific numbers ... Wayne County (Detroit) put it over the top for Kerry ... as I recall, one of the very few Michigan counties that didn't vote for Bush.


62 posted on 07/18/2006 3:04:44 PM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: edzo4

Is there a Necro-American ping list?
Disenfranchising viably challenged voters that would vote for Democrats. Just because they're dead doesn't mean they don't have a legacy.


63 posted on 07/18/2006 3:07:32 PM PDT by griswold3 (Ken Blackwell, Ohio Governor in 2006- No!! You cannot have my governor in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dead; Dead Corpse

Y'all have been disenfranchised ping.


64 posted on 07/18/2006 3:15:37 PM PDT by LexBaird ("Politically Correct" is the politically correct term for "F*cking Retarded". - Psycho Bunny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
15 counties voted for Kerry. Of course, Wayne County alone was enough to overcome Bush's lead in the rest of the state and give Kerry a comfortable victory margin. The same thing happened in Pennsylvania and Philadelphia. Widespread voter fraud by the Dem machines in these cities needs to be stopped. I fault the GOP for not making more of an effort in pursuing this issue.

It is easy to understand why the Dems oppose every effort to require picture IDs for voters.

65 posted on 07/18/2006 3:26:28 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; onyx; Howlin; Bahbah

Thanks Cal. for the heads up, will pass it on!


66 posted on 07/18/2006 3:29:11 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: steve7

He just doesn't want to see the dead disenfranchised


67 posted on 07/18/2006 3:41:07 PM PDT by MattinNJ (The paleocon's paleocon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: oxcart

This is how the dems win elections. If they really did clean up the fraud, there would be far fewer of them in office.


68 posted on 07/18/2006 3:43:46 PM PDT by Bahbah (Democrat Motto: Why not the worst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo
It is entirely possible that Kerry's margin of victory in Michigan were these "voters" in Detroit. Same thing is true in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

How about Philadelphia, PA, Baltimore, MD, NYC, NY?

69 posted on 07/18/2006 3:44:40 PM PDT by rocksblues (Liberals will stop at nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: oxcart

In our county, were have 102.57% voter registration.


70 posted on 07/18/2006 3:45:00 PM PDT by Military family member (GO Colts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

and NJ

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2005/09/dead-people-voting-in-new-jersey.html
** Voting Zombie Alert in New Jersey **

The Republican Party in New Jersey has found THOUSANDS of dead people who voted in the November elections last year:

More at link


71 posted on 07/18/2006 3:51:07 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird
Y'all have been disenfranchised ping.

Awww... dang it.

72 posted on 07/18/2006 4:03:16 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (It is not the oath that makes us believe the man, but the man the oath.- Aeschylus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
"Me vote Clinton" Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
73 posted on 07/18/2006 4:05:13 PM PDT by dynachrome ("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
New Mexico didnt certify the vote until they recounted it many times.

Exactly - it worked for them in 2000 but in 2004, there were just too many votes for Bush for them to manufacture counter votes. Gotta give 'em "A" for effort tho, they tried their darnedest.

74 posted on 07/18/2006 6:27:44 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (LINCOLN: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
This is how the dems win elections. If they really did clean up the fraud, there would be far fewer of them in office.

It's amazing the GOP does as well as it does considering the voter fraud by the democrats and the misinformation by the MSM.
75 posted on 07/18/2006 6:36:10 PM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Freee-dame

LOL! And you actually used "loose" correctly!


76 posted on 07/18/2006 7:31:50 PM PDT by maica (Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle --Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

Thanks! I'm on the lookout for Freep baby-wear!


77 posted on 07/19/2006 9:20:39 AM PDT by Sterm26 (Death before Dhimmitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Thank You,

a bit of good news sneaks out of the papers everyday!


78 posted on 07/19/2006 10:51:28 AM PDT by HowardLSmith.ô¿ô
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Berosus; Cincinatus' Wife; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; ...
In February, the newspaper published a review of ballots cast in the November election that showed many were cast under the names of people who have died, were serving time in prison or did not live in the city.
I guess the question I have is, when the newspaper did that, was it pointing out what a great thing that is?
79 posted on 07/19/2006 11:21:37 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Wednesday, June 21, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

There should be no more shopper card voting, either.

Democrats file briefs in voter ID case
AP via ContraCostTimes.com | 07/18/2006 | KATHY BARKS HOFFMAN
Posted on 07/18/2006 5:30:04 PM EDT by oxcart
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1668060/posts


80 posted on 07/19/2006 11:22:29 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Wednesday, June 21, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson