Skip to comments.
Detroit clerk to purge 55,000 names from voter rolls
AP via Mlive.com ^
| 07/18/2006
| Unknown
Posted on 07/18/2006 1:51:40 PM PDT by oxcart
DETROIT (AP) The city clerk plans to purge the names of nearly 55,000 dead people and those who no longer live in the city from voting rolls as part of an effort to ensure integrity in elections.
Clerk Janice Winfrey bought lists of deaths from the state and city health department. Then she moved to eliminate the names of people who hadn't cast a ballot since before the 2002 election and who had been mailed voter card registration renewal forms that were returned as undeliverable.
Already the names of about 33,000 deceased voters have been removed, The Detroit News reported Tuesday. The rest can be removed after the August primary. Winfrey estimates another 40,000 names can be removed under a similar process in 2008.
Winfrey was elected in November. She unseated Jackie L. Currie, who had held the post since 1994 and was embroiled in a federal probe of her handling of absentee ballots.
Last year, the city had 637,000 registered voters, a figure critics say had to be wrong since according to census figures, Detroit only had 630,000 people 18 or older who were eligible to vote.
In February, the newspaper published a review of ballots cast in the November election that showed many were cast under the names of people who have died, were serving time in prison or did not live in the city.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: 20004election; 2006election; crime; dead; deadvoters; detroit; dirtytricks; disenfranchised; election2004; election2006; electionlaws; howtostealanelection; michigan; rattricks; repository; thedeaddie; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
To: JimRed; skaterboy
Clerk Janice Winfrey bought lists of deaths from the state and city health department.
Yes, apparently she had to buy the lists. Why one government agency should have to pay for mere information from another government agency puzzles me.
In fact, death lists should be automatically forwarded to the appropriate boards of elections. It could be that her buying the lists like any private citizen was an end run around anticipated civil servant shenanigans. Joan Q. Public pays the fee and takes the list, you hardly look at her twice. The new City Clerk in office after a scandal - soon as the request comes in through appropriate governmental channels and with official agency header, it might inspire a little um ... creativity from the records provider. Sad to imagine corruption that deep, but *shrug* there ya go.
61
posted on
07/18/2006 3:03:20 PM PDT
by
Titan Magroyne
(Suicide Bomb Instructor: "Now pay attention, I'm only gonna do this once...")
To: kabar
Thanks for making my point with specific numbers ... Wayne County (Detroit) put it over the top for Kerry ... as I recall, one of the very few Michigan counties that didn't vote for Bush.
62
posted on
07/18/2006 3:04:44 PM PDT
by
BluH2o
To: edzo4
Is there a Necro-American ping list?
Disenfranchising viably challenged voters that would vote for Democrats. Just because they're dead doesn't mean they don't have a legacy.
63
posted on
07/18/2006 3:07:32 PM PDT
by
griswold3
(Ken Blackwell, Ohio Governor in 2006- No!! You cannot have my governor in 2008.)
To: dead; Dead Corpse
Y'all have been disenfranchised ping.
64
posted on
07/18/2006 3:15:37 PM PDT
by
LexBaird
("Politically Correct" is the politically correct term for "F*cking Retarded". - Psycho Bunny)
To: BluH2o
15 counties voted for Kerry. Of course, Wayne County alone was enough to overcome Bush's lead in the rest of the state and give Kerry a comfortable victory margin. The same thing happened in Pennsylvania and Philadelphia. Widespread voter fraud by the Dem machines in these cities needs to be stopped. I fault the GOP for not making more of an effort in pursuing this issue.
It is easy to understand why the Dems oppose every effort to require picture IDs for voters.
65
posted on
07/18/2006 3:26:28 PM PDT
by
kabar
To: Calpernia; onyx; Howlin; Bahbah
Thanks Cal. for the heads up, will pass it on!
To: steve7
He just doesn't want to see the dead disenfranchised
67
posted on
07/18/2006 3:41:07 PM PDT
by
MattinNJ
(The paleocon's paleocon.)
To: oxcart
This is how the dems win elections. If they really did clean up the fraud, there would be far fewer of them in office.
68
posted on
07/18/2006 3:43:46 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
(Democrat Motto: Why not the worst)
To: kjo
It is entirely possible that Kerry's margin of victory in Michigan were these "voters" in Detroit. Same thing is true in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. How about Philadelphia, PA, Baltimore, MD, NYC, NY?
69
posted on
07/18/2006 3:44:40 PM PDT
by
rocksblues
(Liberals will stop at nothing.)
To: oxcart
In our county, were have 102.57% voter registration.
To: rocksblues
71
posted on
07/18/2006 3:51:07 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: LexBaird
Y'all have been disenfranchised ping. Awww... dang it.
72
posted on
07/18/2006 4:03:16 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(It is not the oath that makes us believe the man, but the man the oath.- Aeschylus)
To: Calpernia
"Me vote Clinton"
73
posted on
07/18/2006 4:05:13 PM PDT
by
dynachrome
("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
To: cardinal4
New Mexico didnt certify the vote until they recounted it many times. Exactly - it worked for them in 2000 but in 2004, there were just too many votes for Bush for them to manufacture counter votes. Gotta give 'em "A" for effort tho, they tried their darnedest.
74
posted on
07/18/2006 6:27:44 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
(LINCOLN: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time")
To: Bahbah
This is how the dems win elections. If they really did clean up the fraud, there would be far fewer of them in office.
It's amazing the GOP does as well as it does considering the voter fraud by the democrats and the misinformation by the MSM.
To: Freee-dame
LOL! And you actually used "loose" correctly!
76
posted on
07/18/2006 7:31:50 PM PDT
by
maica
(Things may come to those who wait, but only the things left by those who hustle --Abraham Lincoln)
To: traditional1
Thanks! I'm on the lookout for Freep baby-wear!
77
posted on
07/19/2006 9:20:39 AM PDT
by
Sterm26
(Death before Dhimmitude!)
To: Calpernia
Thank You,
a bit of good news sneaks out of the papers everyday!
To: Berosus; Cincinatus' Wife; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; ...
In February, the newspaper published a review of ballots cast in the November election that showed many were cast under the names of people who have died, were serving time in prison or did not live in the city.
I guess the question I have is, when the newspaper did that, was it pointing out what a great thing that is?
79
posted on
07/19/2006 11:21:37 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Wednesday, June 21, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
80
posted on
07/19/2006 11:22:29 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Wednesday, June 21, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson