Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oregon Smokers Beware: Web tobacco buyers targeted for back taxes by state
United Pro Smoker's Newsletter ^ | June 23, 2006

Posted on 06/25/2006 8:10:40 PM PDT by SheLion

The state moved to expand its pursuit of tax dollars from smokers who buy cigarettes over the Internet.

The Department of Revenue — at a cost of $88,000 — sent tax bills late last year to 7,500 smokers who bought cigarettes online without paying Oregon’s tax of $1.18 a pack. Roughly 33 percent of the people who received letters paid their taxes, generating $686,000.

On Thursday, a subcommittee of the Legislative Emergency Board gave preliminary approval to the Department of Revenue to spend another $240,000 to send letters to people listed on another 23,000 invoices.

The full Emergency Board, which doles out money when the full Legislature is not in session, is expected to approve the spending.

State Sen. Frank Morse, R-Albany, noting that an 8-to-1 return is enticing, asked agency officials if even more could be invested in such efforts.

“Are there any additional taxes that could be collected that we are not?” he asked.

There could be.
The state is receiving copies of about 1,400 invoices a month from several online dealers, the Department of Revenue said.

Internet cigarette sellers offer cheaper rates in part because they do not collect state taxes. Under legal pressure, they began turning over customer data to states a year ago. A federal law prohibits retailers from delivering tobacco products across state lines without reporting their sales.

Elizabeth Harchenko, the director of the revenue agency, said it’s impossible to say whether the next group of invoices will yield a similar amount of taxes. While only a third of people responded to the first letters, nobody has the option of not paying, she said.

Those who get a letter and do not pay go into the state’s catalog of people who are delinquent on taxes, and will face fines, penalties and interest.

Cigarette taxes in Oregon add up to about $235 million a year, with about half of the money helping to pay for subsidized health care. The money also goes to smoking cessation efforts, cities and counties, and to the state general fund.

The state estimates 500,000 Oregonians are smokers, and that 3 percent of them are buying their cigarettes over the Internet.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: anti; antismokers; augusta; bans; budget; butts; camel; caribou; chicago; cigar; cigarettes; cigarettetax; commerce; epa; fda; governor; individual; interstate; kool; lawmakers; lewiston; liberty; maine; mainesmokers; marlboro; msa; niconazis; osha; pallmall; pipe; portland; prosmoker; pufflist; quitsmoking; regulation; rico; rights; rinos; ryo; sales; senate; smokers; smoking; smokingbans; taxes; tobacco; winston
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-185 next last
To: Just another Joe; Raycpa

JaJ, you are wasting your breath.

Ray is part of the extortion network...the more complicated the system the more money he and his colleagues stand to make from the average Joe who feels intimidated by all the tax codes.

Anyone that does not consider sales, use, and excise taxes to be regressive is not just part of the system, but part of the problem and will NEVER be part of the solution.


81 posted on 06/26/2006 8:07:48 AM PDT by Gabz (Proud to be a WalMartian --- beep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

I still can't figure out if there are collection methods set up for these tobacco taxes.

If there is no method set up to collect them, then how are people being back billed for them?


82 posted on 06/26/2006 8:15:25 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

You have a legitimate question.......but it seems as one with no answer.

If there is no means of paying, because there is no means of collection, how can there be a bill? It's a typical bureaucratic fuster cluck circular situation.


83 posted on 06/26/2006 8:29:06 AM PDT by Gabz (Proud to be a WalMartian --- beep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

"Why? so they can be better tax cheats?"

I have often thought a good college course would be "tax-evasion 101"

You could be the professor.


84 posted on 06/26/2006 9:11:08 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: caver

"wait till they get hit up for online purchases like eBay and Amoazon, etc."

That's right. I'll bet they'll be squalling then.


85 posted on 06/26/2006 9:12:38 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Why? so they can be better tax cheats?

Tax cheats are patriots, Ray.

Starve the beast and all that.

86 posted on 06/26/2006 9:14:38 AM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

"Yes. And it really confuses 'me' as to what being a Conservative is really supposed to mean"

Lioness, you and I aren't confused. They are.
They are what I like to call libservatives.


87 posted on 06/26/2006 9:14:38 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
pa·tri·ot (pā'trē-ət, -ŏt') pronunciation n. One who loves, supports, and defends one's country. Cheating on taxes is an example of love, support and defense ?
88 posted on 06/26/2006 9:28:59 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Cheating on taxes is an example of love, support and defense ?

Yes. Paying taxes to support the necessary and authorized functions of government is patriotic.

Paying taxes to fund social engineering and wealth and income redistribution schemes is not.

89 posted on 06/26/2006 9:35:01 AM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

And they say it's not about the money......


Yeah. Right.


90 posted on 06/26/2006 9:37:51 AM PDT by RikaStrom (The number one rule of the Kama Sutra is that you both be on the same page.../Exeter 051705)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Spotting and Dumping the Criminal Mind

"...Consider Dostoevsky's analysis of the criminal mind in his masterwork `Crime and Punishment': The criminal assumption is that one has the right and authority to take or confiscate values earned by others so long as someone else has a need for those values."

The Criminal Mind is a mode of thinking that lays the responsibility for taking care of oneself onto others. A person with a criminal mind constantly projects that others owe him something -- be it money, a job, happiness, love, or anything else of value.

Instead of focussing on earning values, the criminal mind conjures up rationalizations as to why one deserves values belonging to others. Earn is replaced with deserve. The responsibility to provide that deserved value is then automatically placed on someone else.

The criminal mind functions through destructive rationalizations that subvert the ability to produce competitive values. A person in a criminal-mind mode stops exerting the honesty, effort, and integrations required to effectively deal with problems and build competitive values.

While criminal-mind thinking festers at the core of all criminals, such thinking is also used by others for camouflaged manipulation. A person can employ criminal-mind thinking without actually being a criminal.


http://www.neo-tech.com/global/appendix3.html


91 posted on 06/26/2006 9:42:36 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Just living the outlaw life, Ray.

"when you are an Outlaw, your heart and mind (unlike most everybody else’s) are your own." - Claire Wolfe

Living the outlaw life: Freeing your inner outlaw

92 posted on 06/26/2006 9:48:41 AM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
The criminal assumption is that one has the right and authority to take or confiscate values earned by others so long as someone else has a need for those values."

So, what you're telling me is that our government is criminal?
Ray, I didn't think you had it in you.

93 posted on 06/26/2006 9:55:58 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

And you agree with this?????????

Apparently you do, or you would not be arguing in favor of confiscatory tax schemes.........


94 posted on 06/26/2006 10:09:06 AM PDT by Gabz (Proud to be a WalMartian --- beep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
I've no idea how this is done in other states. But on MY state tax form, you have ONE line to enter an amount of purchases for the year that need taxes paid. There is no itemization to show what the purchases were for.

Do other state have an itemization? How is a state determining someone hasn't paid taxes on Net purchases?

Most of my shopping is done over the Internet now.  Not cigarettes.  Have not ordered cigarettes.  But a lot of other things.

I have my taxes done at H&R Block. NOT ONCE in the past THREE YEARS has he ask me about if I bought over the Internet.  Not once!!!

95 posted on 06/26/2006 10:27:42 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

In my state the law is broken out for cigarettes and tobacco. Raycpa's links he posted shows that too.

Regardless, there isn't an entry or method that I can see for paying these taxes other than the line item mentioned in our posts back and forth.


96 posted on 06/26/2006 10:30:11 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Gabz; Just another Joe
Maybe, just maybe JaJ, so people know who NOT to do business with. Choosing not to do business with a company has nothign to do with illegal activity, we all choose who to do business with on a daily basis based on our own preferences.

And customer service.  The way they treat the customer means everything to me.  If their customer service stinks (i.e. turning in customer lists), then I will kick them to the curb.

97 posted on 06/26/2006 10:34:08 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa; Just another Joe
The politicians apparently found a group that accepts the tax because in general they do not change their consumption habits even when the taxes are extortionist. If the demand dropped then the taxes would also.

I know for a FACT that the Maine Governor cannot balance the state budget without the smokers tax dollars.

So what does that tell you?!

25-30% of Maine people smoke.  25-30% of the Maine people are carrying the weight of the state budget on their shoulders and this is NOT right!

98 posted on 06/26/2006 10:46:44 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; All
Check out the Newsletter, updated weekly for news in your area:

The United Pro Choice Smokers Rights Newsletter

99 posted on 06/26/2006 10:47:39 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe

One or the other is criminal. I guess it depends on which one has the bigger gun.


100 posted on 06/26/2006 10:48:11 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson