Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North American Union to Replace USA?
Human Events ^ | May 19, 2006 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 06/08/2006 4:39:24 AM PDT by conservativecorner

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.

The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:

The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.

Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.

Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?

Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), and "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians." He is a frequent guest on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show. He will soon co-author a new book with Jim Gilchrist on the Minuteman Project.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2008; backstabbing; bush; cfr; cuespookymusic; duncanhunter; kook; kookism; kooks; koolaid; northamericanunion; oneworldgovernment; sellout; sovereignty; tinfoilhat; traitors; treaties
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: conservativecorner
I see - all you have to do is f*ck up your own country and then force your pathologies and failures onto your wealthier neighbor(s).

And it would be force despite what our elected representatives can be bribed, persuaded, hoodwinked into doing.

41 posted on 06/08/2006 6:59:06 AM PDT by Let's Roll ( "Congressmen who ... undermine the military ... should be arrested, exiled or hanged" - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan; snugs; ILuvW; MJY1288; silent_jonny; Wolfstar; Darksheare; Billie; ST.LOUIE1; Dubya; ...
Y'all won't believe this thread!

What a CROCK!

42 posted on 06/08/2006 7:00:23 AM PDT by Pippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pippin
And your point is? I don't care whether you believe it or not. Just because you don't believe something is happening doesn't make it so unless you are God. Otherwise, it's simply your opinion, and we all have them.
43 posted on 06/08/2006 7:03:12 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

I'm glad we agree we have differing opinions, I'll respect yours if you respect mine.


44 posted on 06/08/2006 7:05:57 AM PDT by Pippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Pippin

LOL it could always be, but nothing suprises me anymore. It could explain why the government really doesn't seem to want to do anything with the borders. And since the Council of Foreign Relations is slightly left of center, it would not suprise me that they would be doing this.


45 posted on 06/08/2006 7:08:00 AM PDT by Lemondropkid31 (Barbaro, please get better!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Pippin
You bet, and I know there will never be 100% consensus on anything. We agree to disagree.
46 posted on 06/08/2006 7:09:18 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Russ
Bush is going to do this all by himself? Where is congress in this diabolical plot? He really has to hurry since he only has two years left in office. Please line up on the left to get fitted for your tinfoil hats...

Of course Bush isn't going to do this all by himself. He, like congress, is nothing more than a figurehead for the financial syndicates (new world royalty) that have bought our political system. The process has been slowly evolving for decades. Ronald Reagan was very distrustful of the Bush machine. Ross Perot tried to warn us of its dangers. The clintons and the Bushes seem to be responding to the same core world agenda, while distracting us with the hate issues of abortion and homosexuality. Please line up with your head in the ground and look for security and ignore the reality that is biting you in the rear.

47 posted on 06/08/2006 7:11:20 AM PDT by ghostrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Which is why Britain should have made EFTA strong and never joined the EU


48 posted on 06/08/2006 7:12:25 AM PDT by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
I'm with you. A Canada/USA link-up would be a good match-up as the culture
lingusitic, socio-economic structures and levels are comparable.
Mexico is on a different level from a socio-ecomonic perspective and
its integration into a union would be problematic.
Quebec is also an obvious issue and could be cut loose and become a home
for all cultures (Islamists as and example) who feel "uncomfortable"
in a western style democracy and culture.
49 posted on 06/08/2006 7:14:59 AM PDT by CaptainCanada ("Macht doch Eiern Dreck aleene!" (Take care of your own mess!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Fruitbat

Well, this might explain why our local grocery store was out of aluminum foil yesterday. Takes a lot of tinfoil to follow some of these topics.


50 posted on 06/08/2006 7:17:14 AM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Thanks :o)


51 posted on 06/08/2006 7:26:39 AM PDT by Pippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Lemondropkid31; conservativecorner

I'm willing to keep an open mind on this


52 posted on 06/08/2006 7:27:28 AM PDT by Pippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: CaptainCanada

But wasn't it the French speakers who recently put the conservatives in power in Canada?


53 posted on 06/08/2006 7:33:24 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Pippin

Me too. We will just have to see what happens.


54 posted on 06/08/2006 8:35:44 AM PDT by Lemondropkid31 (Barbaro, please get better!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Well, this might explain why our local grocery store was out of aluminum foil yesterday. Takes a lot of tinfoil to follow some of these topics.

Yeah, well when logical and sound reasons are about as sparse as truth in Hillary Clinton's speeches, then yeah, "aluminum foil" is bound to be a big seller, eh!

55 posted on 06/08/2006 9:25:46 AM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Corsi just makes this stuff up.

Really? Would you say the same of Unfit For Command?

56 posted on 06/08/2006 9:30:54 AM PDT by La Enchiladita (God Bless Our Troops...including U.S. Border Patrol, America's First Line of Defense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

No.


57 posted on 06/08/2006 9:34:46 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Pippin; raybbr; Veto!; nicmarlo; hedgetrimmer; SwinneySwitch; winker; Savage Beast; ...
I'm willing to keep an open mind on this

Well, that was a change over "not believing one word." We would all rather that it is not true. Sadly, there are too many developments that point in the direction of a homogenized North America. In particular, there appears to be zeal on the part of Bush family to Latinize our Nation. To wit, the following speech:

"Century of the Americas" Speech, Candidate George W. Bush, August 25, 2000

In addition, here is a quote from the President's speech + press conference in Omaha, Nebraska, yesterday:

When I get back to Washington I'm going to sign an executive order creating a task force on the new Americas.

58 posted on 06/08/2006 9:45:45 AM PDT by La Enchiladita (God Bless Our Troops...including U.S. Border Patrol, America's First Line of Defense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Fruitbat
EXCELLENT point! If this behavior had been during Clinton's term, the same people, largely the Bushbots, would have been raging the same as those of us opposed to Bush's immigration/bordercontrol/domestic security policies, agenda, and opinions.

Cognitive dissonance is a powerful force.

59 posted on 06/08/2006 10:00:25 AM PDT by jmc813 (The best mathematical equation I have ever seen: 1 cross + 3 nails= 4 given.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
When I posted that about not believing what was written on this thread was said in shock.

I'll have to look into this, thanks for the link.

60 posted on 06/08/2006 10:04:23 AM PDT by Pippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson