North American Union to Replace USA?

Human Events ^ | May 19, 2006 | Jerome R. Corsi

[newcthem]

Hell...........our congressmen can't even do an effective job of hiding their bribes, do you really think they have time to deal with issuses like national security??

[taxed2death]

Already posted here....and most definately not made up...some remarkable FReepers dug thouroughly to the bottom of this cess pool and exposed some rather startling facts...if ya got the time... check it out.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1634942/posts

[satchmodog9]

I have posted this link before. http://www.oas.org/

[CWOJackson]

I think he's a remarkable blend of both.

[taxed2death]

check the link in post number 22. No tin foil needed. You can't argue the facts.

[Wolfie]

You can't argue the facts

No, but you can ignore them. Or better yet, distract by screaming about gay marriage.

[R.W.Ratikal]

This writer has it right. It's nothing new. World Government has been the dream of insider Utopians for decades ever since the end of WWI.

As long ago as the time when Nelson Rockefeller was a presidential aspirant both parties and the insiders were talking about the "New World Order."

President Bush Sr. also sold the New World Order concept. It sort of died down during the Clinton years but it has always been the goal of those who pull the strings behind the scenes in every Western nation.

That is the reason for the fact that our leaders, and other world leaders, have always supported the United Nations. The U. N. is to be the vehicle for world government.

That is also the reason why such international insider organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations and other European non-governmental policy-makers were established.

These groups have always operated in the shadows and were poo pooed by our elite leaders as merely innocuous think-tanks for "policy studies."

The EU, NAFTA, CAFTA etc., are all a part of splatting the world into regional areas. Next, look for a U.N. world income tax to be levied on "rich" nations.

This has been well known for years but those who spoke out about it were marginalized as "conspiracy nuts." Now it's out in the open.

[conservativecorner]

Could the national party be any more obvious in their parading of this issue [gay marriage amendment] so that we forget about the really important issues facing our country?

[CWOJackson]

Oh, no! And it was just announced that the Build-A-Burgers are going to have another secret meeting!

[Lemondropkid31]

Wow, they have all this stuff figured out already!!! It's no wonder the governments want to do nothing about the borders. They don't want the borders!!!!! I wonder how easy it would be to get one of these biometric border passes.

[BadAndy]

Looks like Bush has some explaining to do, if any of the so-called reporters had the nerve to ask. Can you imagine a bigger story than the President of the United States essentially planning to dissolve the country? What a great campaign issue for the Rat party. BTW, if this is true Bush should not only be impeached but locked up for treason.

[MizSterious]

Well, let's see if there's any truth to it before getting out the pitchforks. Actually, I doubt there's any truth to it at all.

[GMMAC]

Forget Mexico - obviously !!!

... but here's a source to provide some balance to discussion of this topic:

[Lemondropkid31]

I don't know if there is, but these sites were pretty interesting to read;

http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/NorthAmerica_TF_final.pdf

http://www.senate.gov/~foreign/testimony/2005/PastorTestimony050609.pdf


http://www.american.edu/ia/cnas/pdfs/PastorTestimonyCanada.pdf

[Wiz]

Only if Mexico goes Capitalist (and improves its economy to solve illegal migrant problems), Canada goes Conservative, and people are united using English, maybe a good idea. Meanwhile, the thin border down Mexico to lock out migrants and terrorists from there, and the access of the Arctic islands north of Canada is attrative for national security.

[Pippin]

What a crock!

I don't believe one word of it!

[DustyMoment]

FINALLY!!!!!! Someone else gets it!!!! I saw what Bush was up to the first time I saw the TTC map pasted and connected the dots with Bush's globalist position. That's when all the pieces fell into place.

Nothing has changed since then to alter the facts.

[IronJack]

the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

With an ample supply of Reynold's Wrap, I've maintained that this was the ultimate goal since NAFTA was introduced. It should seem obvious: the Euros merge into one gigantic common market, so to compete, North America has to do the same. Or so the reasoning goes ...

It also goes to explain Bush's reluctance to control Mexican immigration.

[conservativecorner]

Why fix a problem when you can send the problem to the United States where we get to deal with it? It's certainly worked for them so far.

[Fruitbat]

Well, let's see if there's any truth to it before getting out the pitchforks. Actually, I doubt there's any truth to it at all.

I think that there's probably quite a bit of truth to it. We know that there's a large political contingent that would be in favor of it in spite of their perhaps not having specifically voiced themselves as so. The DimLibs in particular and the RINOs.

But given the seeming sheer and utter lack of concern for the protection and defense of our own sovereignty, one is only left to conclude that that is exactly the desire of Bush, et.al.

I'm not a big conspiracy theorist by any stretch, but I also realize that not all things are "discussed openly" and am not foolish or naive enough to believe that they are.