I'm so very certain that Al-Qaeda had Robert's Rules of Order in mind when they did
The CP are pacifists. Screw them. There are no political parties which support me or my fellow soldiers in the field. I'm staying home.
And, if one were to delve deeper, one would find there are other Libertarian principals that conservatives find unacceptable.
"2006: the year of the Constitution Party?"
No, but this talk plus stupid talk from the liberal-tarians about a third party might make things just right for a rat take over.
Maybe.
Maybe.
I'll think about it. But my real inclination is just to stay home, and I've already sent Dr. James Dobson an e-mail, urging him to call a voter boycott of 2006 for social conservatives.
I sincerely hope he does. 2006 is going to set the tone for 2008.
I need to know that I'm not electing demokkkrats when I vote for a third party candidate. Until then, it will never happen. We need runoff elections, i.e. a guarantee that nobody will ever hold a public office with less than 50% of the vote, and that nobody will ever need fear to vote his first choice, at least on a first ballot.
I'm so very certain that Al-Qaeda had Robert's Rules of Order in mind when they did
The CP are pacifists. Screw them. There are no political parties which support me or my fellow soldiers in the field. I'm staying home.
2006: the year of the Constitution Party collapse and destruction of the greatest country on earth. We can thank the 62 morons in the Senate.......
Libertarian=Libertine
So, perhaps 2006 really is "the year of the Constitution Party."
And, if one were to delve deeper, one would find there are other Libertarian principals that conservatives find unacceptable.
_________________________
Such as support for abortion, legalization of psychedelic drugs, homosexual marriage, radical isolationism, unrestricted trade, and unrestricted control of the environment by government.
The Libertarian party is not founded on (US) Constitutional authority. It is a radical left wing variation of Marxism.
This move is GUARANTEED to elect Democrats to a majority. If any fringe party needs to be strengthened, it is the Greens. The Greens drive the dim candidates to the left and make the voters aware of dim "core values". The best way to insure more conservative policies by Republicans is to make our majorities LARGER so that there will be no need to enlarge the tent.
Just keep Pat Buchanan out of it and it might succeed over time.
No, the constitution party continues to be the party of the wasted vote.
If they were serious, instead of being loyal Moby useful idiots, they would form a "constitution caucus" and work to change the republican party from within.
If the constitution parter were anything but a bunch of fringe left overs they would have the organization and manpower to go into the primaries and caucuses to make their votes and voices matter.
As it stands now, a vote for the constitution party is a vote for Hitlary, Kerry, Algore, Edwards, BJClinton, Reid, and Pelosi.
I like the CP party and pay attention to politics but I can't name a single CP candidate. Are these guys in hiding?
The current political environment is ripe for a viable third party but none are emerging.
And, if one were to delve deeper, one would find there are other Libertarian principals that conservatives find unacceptable.
Which is why I've gone from being a capital "L" Libertarian to a small "l" libertarian.
Post #5 on this thread says it all:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1638966/posts?page=16#5
True conservatives vote based on their values, not for parties.
2008 not 2006, we must support the R's (and D's) in both the House and Senate that are trying to stop Bush and his pal Ted Kennedy.
THE GREAT DIVIDE [puritan v agrarian republicans]
Address:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1638794/posts