Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Spectacular hyposcrisy on many levels.
1 posted on 05/07/2006 8:05:50 AM PDT by dhuffman@awod.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: dhuffman@awod.com

Why doesn't he just take out a fatwa on them for insulting Christendom?


2 posted on 05/07/2006 8:06:57 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah; Coleus

bump


3 posted on 05/07/2006 8:07:22 AM PDT by John Geyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com

Well, in the USA, being offended by a movie that doesn't agree with your religious beliefs is not actionable. I don't know about Italy.

In my opinion, the answer to such movies is different:

If the film offends.
Please don't attend.


4 posted on 05/07/2006 8:08:00 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com

Well, don't leave us in suspense. What are the many levels of hypocrisy?


5 posted on 05/07/2006 8:08:36 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper (..it takes some pretty serious yodeling to..filibuster from a five star ski resort in the Swiss Alps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com

Free PR for a fictional book.

Does everyone remember the fictional "national treasure" movie?

The best thing that couldhave been done is to ignore the movie.


6 posted on 05/07/2006 8:09:35 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com

I don't see how it's hypocritical. Europe has all sorts of restrictions on free speech - think "hate speech" laws carried to an extreme - and, while I don't agree with the principle of that kind of law, everybody certainly has a right to use them.

Furthermore, "silence gives consent," that is, if Christians say nothing, this is taken as assent and an admission of the truth of the Da Vinci Code (which is actually a set of crazy old-style anti-Catholicism and New Age gnosticism).


7 posted on 05/07/2006 8:13:45 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com
The Da Vinci Code, book and movie, is an outrageous blasphemy of Jesus Christ. The fictional story charges Jesus was secretly married and fathered a child for which there has never been any historical proof. It makes charges of a big Catholic Church "cover-up" of these alleged "facts."

The Catholic Church and its officials have a right to publicly denounce the book and movie as patently offensive to Christians.

In contrast to raging Muslims, offended by newspaper cartoons drawn of their prophet, I haven't heard of any Christians burning and looting in the streets over this blasphemy of our deeply held faith.

Christians throughout the world can, and should, avoid watching this offensive trash posing as entertainment.

11 posted on 05/07/2006 8:20:57 AM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com

LOL! Boy, those church leaders NEVER learn do they???

The more you cry and scream about being "offended" by something, the more curious people become and want to see it. "The Last Temptation of Christ" was a perfect example. The movie sucked and lasted TWICE as long at the box office than it would had the Church kept its mouth shut.

The Da Vinci Code is a wonderful and entertaining book... of FICTION!


17 posted on 05/07/2006 8:33:10 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (http://ntxsolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com

"hyposcrisy on many levels"

Oh, really?
For instance?


25 posted on 05/07/2006 8:54:53 AM PDT by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com

Hypocrisy or not, after Piss Christ and Mary in Elephant Dung, I am actually happy that the Church is responding to "art" that does not please the Church. The DC is nice fiction, but I don't see much evidence of truth.


26 posted on 05/07/2006 8:56:11 AM PDT by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com
...a leading cardinal says Christians should respond to the book and film with legal action because both offend Christ and the Church he founded.

Much ado about nothing.

The book, written by Dan Brown, has sold more than 40 million copies.

Could that be the real irritant for the Church?

Perhaps they're not getting their "tithe" of the profits.

32 posted on 05/07/2006 9:03:53 AM PDT by OldSmaj (I received my koran from CAIR. I desecrate it daily, in the privacy and comfort of my own toilet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com
"The Da Vinci Code Nicene Council-A Masterful Deception."
35 posted on 05/07/2006 9:22:53 AM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com

"All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents and secret rituals in this novel are accurate."

That is how Dan Brown starts his fiction..and that has led to the main problem...it is a lie!


As for hypocrisy - the hypocrisy stands with the Hollywood anti Christian establishment that seeks to offend every Christian...any time the opportunity presents itself...even in the form of the charlatan Brown.

The Roman Church has every right and indeed a responsiblity to defend the Lord and his flock and attack this worthless lying garbage. People can make up their own minds (they usually do) but the Pope can as well...and publicize it.

The Greek Orthoox Church has also debunked this trash.


http://www.goarch.org/en/ourfaith/articles/article9540.asp


40 posted on 05/07/2006 9:43:11 AM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com

How hypocritical exactly?


41 posted on 05/07/2006 9:58:24 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com
Ambiguous Reuters headline? Here's what the Cardinal said:

"Sometimes it is our duty to do something practical. So it is not I who will tell all Christians what to do but some know legal means which can be taken in order to get the other person to respect the rights of others," Arinze said.

Does he mean, "Take 'em to court," or does he mean "legal as opposed to illegal"?

At any rate, I think the Cardinal is spot on. As for hypocrisy, I'd check the mirror before attacking the Catholic Church, brother.
42 posted on 05/07/2006 10:04:12 AM PDT by Antoninus (I will not vote for a liberal, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com

This is amazing that a work of fiction has the Vatican's panties in a wad. Dan Brown doesn't claim that the Da Vinci Code is anything but a work of fiction - it is the Vatican and the Catholic Church that gives credibility to the plot by arguing that it never happened. Brown doesn't claim otherwise.

The publicity he has gotten courtesy of the Catholic Church has caused this book's sales to go through the roof.


44 posted on 05/07/2006 10:06:43 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com

The Catholic church is getting so worked up over this that I'm starting to wonder if the book is actually on to something. Methinks they doth protest too much.


62 posted on 05/07/2006 10:55:31 AM PDT by LanaTurnerOverdrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com

Lets all propose legal action against all of the pedophiles in the Catholic Church.


67 posted on 05/07/2006 11:09:33 AM PDT by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com
"Arinze's appeal came some 10 days after another Vatican cardinal called for a boycott of the film. Both cardinals asserted that other religions would never stand for offences against their beliefs and that Christians should get tough.

"Christians must not just sit back and say it is enough for us to forgive and to forget," Arinze said in the documentary made by Rome film maker Mario Biasetti for Rome Reports, a Catholic film agency specializing in religious affairs."

They're absolutely right and so refreshing to hear. I fail to see the "hypocrisy."

114 posted on 05/07/2006 1:55:10 PM PDT by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dhuffman@awod.com
i doubt if any records anywhere, in the Vatican secret archives, or wherever, could prove any of these points one way or another. my impression from reading historical works about Jesus and the early church is that the documentation from the early period is pretty slim. there is the New Testament and a few historical references.
Belief in Jesus as the Son of God is based on faith, not on historical records.
the Church (or churches) will go on, the debates about Jesus will go on, but Dan Brown will be forgotten within a few years after he publishes his final novel.
i tried reading his earlier novel, but i would not call him a "gifted" writer, and i put it down out of boredom.
133 posted on 05/07/2006 3:38:53 PM PDT by drhogan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson