Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Immigration: 37% Trust GOP, 31% Dems
Rasmussen Reports ^ | 4/1/2006 | Rasmussen Reports

Posted on 04/11/2006 11:12:36 AM PDT by philsfan24

April 11, 2006--In a political season when most of the news has been bad for Republicans, the Congressional debate over immigration has produced a bit of movement in favor of the GOP.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national opinion survey found that 37% of Americans now trust Republicans more than Democrats on the issue of immigration. Just 31% trust the Democrats more.

In late March, the two parties were perceived equally on the topic, with 38% favoring the GOP and 37% preferring the Democrats.

Americans remain divided on the issue itself. Just 41% favor letting immigrants move towards citizenship by paying a fine, paying back taxes, and learning to speak English. Forty-two percent (42%) are opposed.

Forty-two percent (42%) believe a barrier along the Mexican border would significantly reduce immigration while 39% disagree.

Still, 57% believe a barrier should be built. Just 31% disagree.

A separate survey found that, in a hypothetical race for Congress, a plurality of Americans would vote for the candidate who favors more enforcement on the immigration issue.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; amnesty; borderlist; democrats; deportation; gop; illegalaliens; immigrants; immigration; issues; poll; polls; trust
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: philsfan24

Any study of GOP leadership on the issue of immigration should divide the House, Senate, and White House. The Republican House is showing strong leadership on this issue, and would have far hither "trust" numbers than would the Senate...and "you know who" on this issue.


41 posted on 04/11/2006 4:44:30 PM PDT by RavenATB (Patton was right...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackadams

"My vote is for Tancredo."

I wish he'd run for higher office.


42 posted on 04/11/2006 4:45:44 PM PDT by RavenATB (Patton was right...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

WSJ and Forbes are not at all out to lunch.

The represent the interests of people who benefit from cheap labor and want to glut the American labor market to tilt the balance of power between labor and capital massively in favor of capital. They represent the interests of people who want a borderless world governed by a corporate plutocracy.


43 posted on 04/11/2006 5:22:28 PM PDT by Sam the Sham (A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: philsfan24

and imagine if our guys were actually out there telling people with a unified voice that the Dems support amnesty.

unfortunately, Bush himself as well as other perceived GOP leaders (McCain) being for the senate bill, is thwarting a unified message getting out against the Dems on this issue.


44 posted on 04/11/2006 5:25:39 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham

A far thinking capitalist would remember Rome. The capital gain from short labor is short term if the capitalists become an endangered minority.

Patriotically speaking, and thinking of their own posterity, they are short-sighted... out to lunch. And, I say this as someone who has benefited through the capital markets.


45 posted on 04/11/2006 5:30:09 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really needed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
And WHEN they don't, we just say, "thank you sir may I have another?"

What I don't do is figure "Hmmm, the GOP aren't doing what I want--I KNOW! I'll put Dean and Hilary in charge of immigration! I'm sure they'll put tough-on-illegal-immigration judges on the bench!"

Duhhhhh that sounds logical!

46 posted on 04/11/2006 5:54:48 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 ("Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. " TR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Actually, we live in a world in which rich people can physically remove themselves from contact with the lower orders. Have you seen the ads for a permanently out to sea luxurious cruise ship where rich people never have to touch land ? What an incredible metaphor that is for our age ! Rich people can just divorce themselves from all accountability and the consequences of their actions.

Globalization is fine if you can live behind walls as el jefe.


47 posted on 04/11/2006 6:06:24 PM PDT by Sam the Sham (A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
Because it's always better to make the other guy look bad than to actually have to stand for what you believe.

Well, as it stands right now, Buch is getting Hammered from his base and from the illegals... he needs to start win some battles dont ya think?

48 posted on 04/11/2006 6:11:33 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: philsfan24

The republicans have a chance to clean house this election and in 2008 if they just do the right thing. Close the borders, and take the steps necessary to get the 12 to 25 million illegals out of the country (i.e., employer sanctions, cut off public services, enable local law enforcement to aid INS, etc.). The majority of hispanics that are here support getting tough on illegals.


49 posted on 04/11/2006 7:18:42 PM PDT by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

Well, as it stands right now, Buch is getting Hammered from his base and from the illegals... he needs to start win some battles dont ya think?



Sure but do those battles have to be with his base?

The man could avoid so much drama if he would simply explain WHY open, porous borders are a good thing. WHY having 11 to 20 million non-english speaking criminals in our country is a good thing. WHY having voting ballots printed in a dozen different languages is a good thing. WHY ICE won't do the job of raiding job sites and arresting employers.

I guess I would just like to know why. I have sent him letters and e-mails asking that. Maybe I should send them in Spanish, I might get a response.


50 posted on 04/12/2006 7:31:13 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (Must...obey....taco....man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Voting for either party sounds illogical to anyone concerned about the sovereignty of the country.


51 posted on 04/12/2006 7:32:23 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (Must...obey....taco....man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
WHY having 11 to 20 million non-english speaking criminals in our country is a good thing.

They are here, like it or not we are stuck with them. The best we can do is build a wall and stop any more from coming illegally and if we need more "workers" make them go though a checkpoint a give information.

52 posted on 04/12/2006 7:48:23 AM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

build a wall and stop any more from coming illegally and if we need more "workers" make them go though a checkpoint a give information



I agree with this, but build the darned wall, THEN lets discuss amnesty. It is amnesty, calling it a "guest worker" or "temporary worker" program insinuates that they will leave at some point. I think everyone knows that is not going to happen unless we make it happen. Unfortunately no one with the power to do so has the testicular fortitude to use that power.


53 posted on 04/12/2006 7:53:41 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (Must...obey....taco....man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
i agree, i want the full WALL, should cost about 6.1Billion. thats not that much. I think the security should come before the "status" of the aliens.

I just think voting 3rd party is futile because if you can't force change within the Republican Party by voting in more Conservative candidates starting some "new party" is already doomed to fail because you have already proven that you don't have the votes.

54 posted on 04/12/2006 8:06:10 AM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

But I don't want to reward the Repubs for signing away the sovereignty of my country. I am much more loyal to my country than I am to any ploitical party....I know, I'm working on it.


55 posted on 04/12/2006 8:12:27 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (Must...obey....taco....man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy

So don't vote for either party and don't bitch when the dems win. I'm sure they'll be so much better than the Republicans. See my tagline.


56 posted on 04/12/2006 11:50:36 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (By 2004, annual inflow of foreign-born persons was down 24% from its all-time high in 2000--PEW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

So don't vote for either party and don't bitch when the dems win




I won't, and I wont. If the dems win, it will be because the Repubs tried to be Dem light and a large chunk of the base just is not going to swallow it.


57 posted on 04/12/2006 11:53:23 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (Allah demands you to send your son to die for him, God sent His son to die for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
I won't, and I wont. If the dems win, it will be because the Repubs tried to be Dem light and a large chunk of the base just is not going to swallow it.

Stop rationalizing: If the Republicans win, you'll say it's because the Republican voters got out the vote; if the Democrats win, it will be because the Republican voters didn't vote. Take responsibility for the consequences of your actions.

If you want to toss out the party that CUT the flow of foreign-born immigration from its high in 2000, gave us Roberts and Alito and MANY conservative judges, cut taxes and is leading the WOT, at least have the cojones to admit YOU made that choice. The "Oh, it's not MY fault I voted or chose not to vote the way I did!" pose isn't suitable for the party that supposedly values personal responsibility.

58 posted on 04/12/2006 12:07:51 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (By 2004, annual inflow of foreign-born persons was down 24% from its all-time high in 2000--PEW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Amen. Thanks for saying it out loud.


59 posted on 04/12/2006 12:10:52 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy

Don't you think in many ways that is exactly what the framers had in mind? They deeply distrusted government, but knew it was a necessary evil.


60 posted on 04/12/2006 12:12:21 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson